Table 2 Parameter estimates for the effects of condition, session, and group on performance in the speech comprehension task.

From: Improvements in naturalistic speech-in-noise comprehension in middle-aged and older adults after 3 weeks of computer-based speechreading training

Predictors

Odds Ratios

CI

p

(Intercept)

1.64

1.13–2.36

0.009

condition [AV]

3.57

3.15–4.04

<0.001

session [post]

1.02

0.94–1.10

0.606

group [ST]

0.98

0.80–1.21

0.875

age_z

0.92

0.74–1.14

0.459

condition [AV] : session [post]

1.02

0.95–1.10

0.580

condition [AV] : group [ST]

1.06

0.97–1.16

0.202

session [post] : group [ST]

1.13

1.05–1.21

0.002

condition [AV] : session [post] : group [ST]

1.07

1.00–1.14

0.047

Random effects

   

σ2

3.29

  

τ00 subject

0.58

  

τ00 item

2.88

  

τ11 subject.condition[AV]

0.06

  

τ11 subject.session[post]

0.02

  

τ11 item.condition[AV]

0.16

  

τ11 item.session[post]

0.02

  

Contrasts

   

 condition [A]

−1

   

 condition [AV]

1

   

 session [pre]

−1

   

 session [post]

1

   

 group [AC]

−1

   

 group [ST]

1

   
  1. Interactions are indicated by the symbol “:”. GLMM configuration: response ~ 1 + condition * session * group + age_z + (1 + condition + session | subject) + (1 + condition + session | item).
  2. Bold values indicates statistical significant P values (P < 0.05).