Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: GEMS and the devil in their details

The Original Article was published on 05 July 2019

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bradley, J. P. GEMS and the devil in their details. Nat. Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0833-9 (2019).

  2. Nittler, L. R. et al. A cometary building block in a primitive asteroidal meteorite. Nat. Astron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0737-8 (2019).

  3. Bradley, J. P. Chemically anomalous preaccretionally irradiated grains in interplanetary dust from comets. Science 265, 925–929 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dai, Z. R. & Bradley, J. P. Iron-nickel sulfides in anhydrous interplanetary dust particles. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65, 3601–3612 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dobrică, E., Engrand, C., Leroux, H., Rouzaud, J.-N. & Duprat, J. Transmission electron microscopy of CONCORDIA ultracarbonaceous Antarctic micrometeorites (UCAMMs): mineralogical properties. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 76, 68–82 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Keller, L. P. & Messenger, S. On the origins of GEMS grains. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 5336–5365 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley, J. P. How and where did GEMS form? Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 107, 336–340 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keller, L. P. & Messenger, S. On the origins of GEMS grains: a reply. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 107, 341–344 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The manuscript was written by L.R.N. and R.M.S. with input from all of the other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry R. Nittler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nittler, L.R., Stroud, R.M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J.M. et al. Reply to: GEMS and the devil in their details. Nat Astron 3, 606 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0834-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0834-8

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing