Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Sensitization of tumours to immunotherapy by boosting early type-I interferon responses enables epitope spreading

Abstract

The success of cancer immunotherapies is predicated on the targeting of highly expressed neoepitopes, which preferentially favours malignancies with high mutational burden. Here we show that early responses by type-I interferons mediate the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors as well as epitope spreading in poorly immunogenic tumours and that these interferon responses can be enhanced via systemic administration of lipid particles loaded with RNA coding for tumour-unspecific antigens. In mice, the immune responses of tumours sensitive to checkpoint inhibitors were transferable to resistant tumours and resulted in heightened immunity with antigenic spreading that protected the animals from tumour rechallenge. Our findings show that the resistance of tumours to immunotherapy is dictated by the absence of a damage response, which can be restored by boosting early type-I interferon responses to enable epitope spreading and self-amplifying responses in treatment-refractory tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: IFN-I is necessary for complete tumourigenicity and response to ICIs.
Fig. 2: Sensitivity to ICIs is transferrable to resistant models in an IFNAR1-dependent manner.
Fig. 3: Early IFN-I treatment sensitizes antigen recognition and ICI response.
Fig. 4: RNA encoding for non-tumour-specific IFN-I driver antigens (uRNA) sensitizes antigen recognition and ICI response.
Fig. 5: Monotherapy with ML uRNA induces anti-tumour efficacy.
Fig. 6: Serial administration of ML uRNA modulates the pulmonary TME in favour of effector immunity.
Fig. 7: ML uRNA elicits activity against human cell line xenografts, confers protective recall responses and elicits long-term survival in animals near endpoint.
Fig. 8: ML uRNA induces epitope spreading in poorly immunogenic murine models.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the results in this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information and provided as supplementary source data. Raw data for sequencing results can be found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE255666. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Bagchi, S., Yuan, R. & Engleman, E. G. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of cancer: clinical impact and mechanisms of response and resistance. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 16, 223–249 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma, P. & Allison, J. P. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science 348, 56–61 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Granier, C. et al. Mechanisms of action and rationale for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in cancer. ESMO Open 2, e000213 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wei, S. C., Duffy, C. R. & Allison, J. P. Fundamental mechanisms of immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Discov. 8, 1069–1086 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Verma, V. et al. A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Immunother. Cancer 6, 128 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chauhan, A., Burkeen, G., Houranieh, J., Arnold, S. & Anthony, L. Immune checkpoint-associated cardiotoxicity: case report with systematic review of literature. Ann. Oncol. 28, 2034–2038 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Snyder, A. et al. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2189–2199 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rizvi, N. A. et al. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1348 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kandoth, C. et al. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature 502, 333–339 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fares, C. M., Van Allen, E. M., Drake, C. G., Allison, J. P. & Hu-Lieskovan, S. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade: why does checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy not work for all patients? Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 39, 147–164 (2019).

  11. Jenkins, R. W., Barbie, D. A. & Flaherty, K. T. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Br. J. Cancer 118, 9–16 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Morad, G., Helmink, B. A., Sharma, P. & Wargo, J. A. Hallmarks of response, resistance, and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell 184, 5309–5337 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuertes, M. B., Woo, S. R., Burnett, B., Fu, Y. X. & Gajewski, T. F. Type I interferon response and innate immune sensing of cancer. Trends Immunol. 34, 67–73 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benci, J. L. et al. Tumour interferon signaling regulates a multigenic resistance program to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell 167, 1540–1554.e12 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, X. et al. Suppression of type I IFN signaling in tumours mediates resistance to anti-PD-1 treatment that can be overcome by radiotherapy. Cancer Res. 77, 839–850 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacquelot, N. et al. Sustained type I interferon signaling as a mechanism of resistance to PD-1 blockade. Cell Res. 29, 846–861 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, L. et al. A dual role of type I interferons in antitumour immunity. Adv. Biosyst. 4, e1900237 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diamond, M. S. et al. Type I interferon is selectively required by dendritic cells for immune rejection of tumours. J. Exp. Med. 208, 1989–2003 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fuertes, M. B. et al. Host type I IFN signals are required for antitumour CD8+ T cell responses through CD8α+ dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2005–2016 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sayour, E. J. et al. Personalized tumour RNA loaded lipid-nanoparticles prime the systemic and intratumoural milieu for response to cancer immunotherapy. Nano Lett. 18, 6195–6206 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sayour, E. J. et al. Systemic activation of antigen-presenting cells via RNA-loaded nanoparticles. Oncoimmunology 6, e1256527 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kariko, K., Buckstein, M., Ni, H. & Weissman, D. Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA. Immunity 23, 165–175 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baklaushev, V. P. et al. Luciferase expression allows bioluminescence imaging but imposes limitations on the orthotopic mouse (4T1) model of breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 7, 7715 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mendez-Gomez, H. R. et al. RNA aggregates harness the danger response for potent cancer immunotherapy. Cell 187, 2521–2535.e1 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ansari, A. M. et al. Cellular GFP toxicity and immunogenicity: potential confounders in in vivo cell tracking experiments. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 12, 553–559 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Poloni, C. et al. T-cell activation-induced marker assays in health and disease. Immunol. Cell Biol. 101, 491–503 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Reck, M. et al. Updated analysis of KEYNOTE-024: pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumour proportion score of 50% or greater. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 537–546 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Samstein, R. M. et al. Tumour mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types. Nat. Genet. 51, 202–206 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Llosa, N. J. et al. The vigorous immune microenvironment of microsatellite instable colon cancer is balanced by multiple counter-inhibitory checkpoints. Cancer Discov. 5, 43–51 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Valero, C. et al. Response rates to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in microsatellite-stable solid tumours with 10 or more mutations per megabase. JAMA Oncol. 7, 739–743 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hildner, K. et al. Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8α+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science 322, 1097–1100 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Woo, S. R. et al. STING-dependent cytosolic DNA sensing mediates innate immune recognition of immunogenic tumours. Immunity 41, 830–842 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Suschak, J. J., Wang, S., Fitzgerald, K. A. & Lu, S. A cGAS-independent STING/IRF7 pathway mediates the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines. J. Immunol. 196, 310–316 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ayers, M. et al. IFN-γ-related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 2930–2940 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Karachi, A. et al. Modulation of temozolomide dose differentially affects T-cell response to immune checkpoint inhibition. Neuro Oncol. 21, 730–741 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhai, Y. et al. Cloning and characterization of the genes encoding the murine homologues of the human melanoma antigens MART1 and gp100. J. Immunother. 20, 15–25 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, C. et al. Identification of Claudin-6 as a molecular biomarker in pan-cancer through multiple omics integrative analysis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 726656 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mansour, M. et al. Therapy of established B16-F10 melanoma tumours by a single vaccination of CTL/T helper peptides in VacciMax. J. Transl. Med. 5, 20 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosenberg, S. A. Development of cancer immunotherapies based on identification of the genes encoding cancer regression antigens. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 88, 1635–1644 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Overwijk, W. W. & Restifo, N. P. B16 as a mouse model for human melanoma. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142735.im2001s39 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Balmas, E. et al. Islet-autoreactive CD4+ T cells are linked with response to alefacept in type 1 diabetes. JCI Insight https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.167881 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Moore for assistance with veterinary animal experiments; D. Li and Biostatistics and Computational Biology Shared Resource for statistical support; L. Fagman and K. Young for help with large animals; and A. Dongtao Fu of the UF Molecular Pathology Core at the Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine for assistance with genomics experiments. Cartoon images including those for mouse, canine, and schematics in figures were created with BioRender.com. This work was supported by federal awards W81XWH-17-1-0510, K08CA199224, R37CA251978, R01CA266857, R01FD007268 (FDA – OOPD, Office of Orphan Products Development), and P30CA247796; Florida Department of Health 20B11 (Bankhead Coley) and 20L07 (Live Like Bella) awards; and foundation grants from CureSearch (Catapult Award), Alex’s Lemonade Stand (R Accelerated Award), Rally Foundation, Hyundai Hope on Wheels (Hope Scholar Award), Stop Children’s Cancer and the Bonnie R. Freeman Professorship for Pediatric Oncology Research, Danny’s Dream, the Medulloblastoma Initiative (MBI) and Cure Group 4 Medulloblastoma Consortium, Ians Friends Foundation, and the National Pediatric Cancer Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.Q., B.W. and B.D.S. designed and performed the experiments, interpreted the data and co-wrote the paper. D.Z. conducted experimental studies and generated RNA vaccine reagents. J.M., F.W. and J.C.-R. conducted experiments. A.G. assisted with experiments and co-wrote the paper. A.D., C.Z., C.M., A.K., C.X., G.J., R.L., S.M., X.M., R.S.F.M., C.v.R., D.T.N., L.E., N.T., A.B., H.G., Y.C., E.O-R, C.R. and D.S. conducted/assisted with experiments. J.H. provided resources and oversight. S.C.-J. led canine studies. K.F. led H&E organ analyses. N.L.S., W.G.S., M.R., J.A.L. and C.T.F. provided critical resources and oversight. J.-H.L. oversaw statistical analyses. D.A.M. provided key resources and oversight. P.C. and H.R.M.-G. designed and performed experiments, interpreted data and co-wrote the paper. E.J.S. conceived and designed studies, performed experiments, provided resources and co-wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias J. Sayour.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.A.M. and C.T.F. hold an ownership interest in iOncologi, Inc. W.G.S. holds interest in Aurita, Inc. E.J.S. is a paid consultant for Siren Biotechnology and serves on the external advisory board of Nature’s Toolbox with stock options. The paper discusses pending patent applications from S.Q., J.M., A.G., W.G.S., M.R., D.A.M., P.C., H.R.M.-G. and E.J.S, some of which are licensed to iOncologi, Inc. H.R.M.-G. and E.J.S. receive royalty payments from iOncologi, Inc.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks Yang-Xin Fu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–15 and Table 1.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data

Source data for supplementary figures.

Source data

Source Data

Source data for Figs. 1–8.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qdaisat, S., Wummer, B., Stover, B.D. et al. Sensitization of tumours to immunotherapy by boosting early type-I interferon responses enables epitope spreading. Nat. Biomed. Eng 9, 1437–1452 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01380-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01380-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing