Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

Private sector investments in climate change adaptation

Abstract

Amid escalating climate impacts, understanding private sector adaptation is critical. Here using data of actual adaptation expenditures from nearly 300,000 businesses in five coastal regions, we reveal variations in private sector adaptation across sectors and regions. The agriculture sector leads in adaptation efforts, while transport, construction and utilities—that is potential sources of system-wide cascading effects—lag. Small, medium and large businesses prioritize hard and soft measures, barely investing in ecosystem-based adaptations. Adding to the multifaceted discourse on adaptation effectiveness, our panel data reveal positive, although inelastic in the short run, relationships between private sector adaptations and aggregate regional economic performance. Business adaptations in the construction, transport and health sectors associate positively with regional economic performance, with the accommodation and food services sector yielding the highest return per euro invested in adaptation. Combining these findings with existing assessments of adaptation could support the development of societally effective adaptation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Coastal regions included in our adaptation investment dataset.
Fig. 2: Types of private sector adaptations and their relative shares across five coastal regions.
Fig. 3: Differences in adaptation investment shares by economic sector across five coastal regions.
Fig. 4: Patterns of private sector adaptations by measure type across five regions and seven economic sectors.
Fig. 5: Effects of private sector adaptation investments on regional economic performance differentiated by sector and region.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data on private sector adaptation investments that support the findings of this study are available from kMatrix Data Services. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and are not publicly shareable. Any queries regarding the raw data should be directed to kMatrix Data Services (enquiries@kmatrix.org). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The Python code used to produce the display items and the STATA code used for the regression are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16602772 (ref. 51).

References

  1. IPCC. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team et al.) 35–115 (IPCC, 2023).

  2. Coronese, M. Going beyond averages. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 551–552 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandel, A., Battiston, S. & Monasterolo, I. Mapping global financial risks under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 329–334 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bressan, G., Đuranović, A., Monasterolo, I. & Battiston, S. Asset-level assessment of climate physical risk matters for adaptation finance. Nat. Commun. 15, 5371 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hennes, K., Bendig, D. & Löschel, A. Facing the storm: developing corporate adaptation and resilience action plans amid climate uncertainty. Npj Clim. Action 3, 37 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Resch, E. & Gao, J. Climate Change: Business Risks and Opportunities—The Role of Private Sector Adaptation (UNEP, 2022).

  7. World Economic Forum. Accelerating Business Action on Climate Change Adaptation (2023).

  8. Yohe, G., Knee, K. & Kirshen, P. On the economics of coastal adaptation solutions in an uncertain world. Clim. Change 106, 71–92 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kondrup, C. et al. (eds) Climate Adaptation Modelling (Springer International, 2022).

  10. Gawith, D., Hodge, I., Morgan, F. & Daigneault, A. Climate change costs more than we think because people adapt less than we assume. Ecol. Econ. 173, 106636 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taberna, A., Filatova, T., Hadjimichael, A. & Noll, B. Uncertainty in boundedly rational household adaptation to environmental shocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2215675120 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berrang-Ford, L. et al. A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 989–1000 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubiel-Teleszynski, T. et al. System-Wide Amplification of Climate Risk (ECB, 2022).

  14. Bank of England. Key Elements of the 2021 Biennial Exploratory Scenario: Financial Risks From Climate Change (2021).

  15. Mendelsohn, R. Efficient adaptation to climate change. Clim. Change 45, 583–600 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adger, N. W., Arnell, N. W. & Tompkins, E. L. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 77–86 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McKnight, B. & Linnenluecke, M. K. How firm responses to natural disasters strengthen community resilience: a stakeholder-based perspective. Organ. Environ. 29, 290–307 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crick, F., Eskander, S. M. S. U., Fankhauser, S. & Diop, M. How do African SMEs respond to climate risks? Evidence from Kenya and Senegal. World Dev. 108, 157–168 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Skouloudis, A. et al. Assessing Greek small and medium‐sized enterprises’ flood resilience capacity: index development and application. J. Flood Risk Manag. 16, e12858 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Josephson, A., Schrank, H. & Marshall, M. Assessing preparedness of small businesses for hurricane disasters: analysis of pre-disaster owner, business and location characteristics. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 23, 25–35 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dookie, D. S., Conway, D. & Dessai, S. Organisational Preparedness for the Physical Risks of Climate Change in the UK (EGU General Assembly, 2023); https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-851

  22. Neise, T., Sambodo, M. T. & Revilla Diez, J. Are micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises willing to contribute to collective flood risk reduction? Scenario-based field experiments from Jakarta and Semarang, Indonesia. Organ. Environ. 34, 219–242 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hashim, H. M., Ng, Y. G., Talib, O. & Md Tamrin, S. B. Factors influencing flood disaster preparedness initiatives among small and medium enterprises located at flood-prone area. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 60, 102302 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leitold, R., Garschagen, M., Tran, V. & Revilla Diez, J. Flood risk reduction and climate change adaptation of manufacturing firms: global knowledge gaps and lessons from Ho Chi Minh City. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 61, 102351 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Henke, L., Knoth, K. & Sandberg, E. Climate change adaptation in Norwegian businesses—awareness, integration and barriers. Clim. Risk Manag. 45, 100647 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gannon, K. E. et al. Adaptation to climate change in the UK wine sector. Clim. Risk Manag. 42, 100572 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bag, S., Sabbir Rahman, M., Rogers, H., Srivastava, G. & Harm Christiaan Pretorius, J. Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction in the garment industry supply chain network. Transp. Res. E 171, 103031 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. CDP. Climate Change, Forests, and Water Security Questionnairies: Guidance for Companies (2023).

  29. Agrawala, S. et al. Private Sector Engagement in Adaptation to Climate Change: Approaches to Managing Climate Risks (OECD, 2011).

  30. Goldstein, A., Turner, W. R., Gladstone, J. & Hole, D. G. The private sector’s climate change risk and adaptation blind spots. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 18–25 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Howard, S., Howard, S. & Howard, S. Quantitative market analysis of the European Climate Services sector—the application of the kMatrix big data market analytical tool to provide robust market intelligence. Clim. Serv. 17, 100108 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. IPCC. Climate Change 2022—Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023).

  33. Owen, G. What makes climate change adaptation effective? A systematic review of the literature. Glob. Environ. Change 62, 102071 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Singh, C. et al. Interrogating ‘effectiveness’ in climate change adaptation: 11 guiding principles for adaptation research and practice. Clim. Dev. 14, 650–664 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Danese, G. & De Marchi, V. Business adaptation strategies to climate change: a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 485, 144322 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Barrett, S. & Chaitanya, R. S. K. Getting private investment in adaptation to work: effective adaptation, value, and cash flows. Glob. Environ. Change 83, 102761 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Helgeson, J. & O’Fallon, C. Resilience dividends and resilience windfalls: narratives that tie disaster resilience co-benefits to long-term sustainability. Sustainability 13, 4554 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bhutto, M., Khushik, A. G. & Bhutto, N. A. An analysis of private investment in economic growth in three major sectors of Pakistan. Prog. Res. J. Arts Humanit. 6, 113–123 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fankhauser, S., Smith, J. B. & Tol, R. S. J. Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecol. Econ. 30, 67–78 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fankhauser, S. & Tol, R. S. J. On climate change and economic growth. Resour. Energy Econ. 27, 1–17 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. UNDRR. The Human Cost of Disasters: An Overview of the Last 20 Years (2000–2019) (2020).

  42. Georgeson, L., Maslin, M., Poessinouw, M. & Howard, S. Adaptation responses to climate change differ between global megacities. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 584–588 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Herrmann, J. & Guenther, E. Exploring a scale of organizational barriers for enterprises’ climate change adaptation strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 160, 38–49 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mendelsohn, R. The economics of adaptation to climate change in developing countries. Clim. Change Econ. 3, 250006 (2012).

  45. Sakai, P. & Yao, Z. Financial losses and flood damages experienced by SMEs: who are the biggest losers across sectors and sizes? Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 91, 103677 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. European Commission. The Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business and Consumer Surveys (2023).

  47. Eurochambres. Access to Sustainable Finance for SMEs: A European Survey 2023 (2023).

  48. World Bank. Enterprise Surveys Indicators Data—World Bank Group (2023).

  49. Noll, B., Filatova, T., Need, A. & Taberna, A. Contextualizing cross-national patterns in household climate change adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 30–35 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cortés Arbués, I., Chatzivasileiadis, T., Storm, S., Ivanova, O. & Filatova, T. Private investments in climate change adaptation are increasing in Europe, although sectoral differences remain. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 470 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Filatova, T., Taberna, A., Chatzivasileiadis, T. & Cortes Arbues, I. Private sector investments in climate change adaptation [Data and Code]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16602772 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (grant agreement no. 758014). We thank kMatrix, specifically Sarah and Steve Howard, for their continuous support with the database development and administration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.F. designed the overall research project, conceived the research design and wrote the paper. A.T. conducted the descriptive analysis, produced the display items and wrote the paper. T.C. developed the regression model, conducted the sensitivity analysis, produced the display items and contributed to and commented on the paper. I.C.A. supported the data analysis, helped with the dataset description and contributed to and commented on the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Filatova.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Climate Change thanks Sam Barrett, Kate Gannon and Thomas Neise for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Appendices A, B and C, with Tables 1–7 and Figs. 1–4.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

Figure source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Figure source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Figure source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Figure source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filatova, T., Taberna, A., Chatzivasileiadis, T. et al. Private sector investments in climate change adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02423-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02423-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing