Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Low-elevation forest extent in the western United States constrained by soil surface temperatures

Abstract

Climate change and disturbance threaten forested ecosystems across the globe. Our ability to predict the future distribution of forests requires understanding the limiting factors for regeneration. Forest canopies buffer against near-surface air temperature and vapour pressure deficit extremes, and ongoing losses of forest canopy from disturbances such as wildfire can exacerbate climate constraints on natural regeneration. Here we combine experimental, empirical and simulation-based evidence to show that soil surface temperatures constrain the low-elevation extent of forests in the western United States. Simulated potential soil surface temperatures predict the position of the low-elevation forest treeline, exhibiting temperature thresholds consistent with field and laboratory studies. High-resolution historical and future surface temperature maps show that 107,000–238,000 km2 (13–20%) of currently forested area exceeds the critical thermal threshold for forest regeneration and this area is projected to more than double by 2050. Soil surface temperature is an important physical control on seedling survival at low elevations that will likely be an increasing constraint on the extent of western United States forests as the climate warms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: SST response functions.
Fig. 2: Soil surface temperatures contain low elevation forests.
Fig. 3: Projected change in modelled forest cover between 1982–2018 and 2050.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data that support the findings of this study are openly available at the references provided. New and derived datasets, including seedling experiments and 30 m gridded surface temperature predictions, are available via Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26950843 (ref. 51).

Code availability

The data and code that support the findings of this study are available via Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26950843 (ref. 51).

References

  1. Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. A climate risk analysis of Earth’s forests in the 21st century. Science 377, 1099–1103 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, C. D. et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 259, 660–684 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  6. Abatzoglou, J. T. & Williams, A. P. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11770–11775 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Tree mortality from drought, insects, and their interactions in a changing climate. New Phytol. 208, 674–683 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens-Rumann, C. S. et al. Evidence for declining forest resilience to wildfires under climate change. Ecol. Lett. 21, 243–252 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, K. T. et al. Reduced fire severity offers near-term buffer to climate-driven declines in conifer resilience across the western United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2208120120 (2023).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coop, J. D. et al. Wildfire-driven forest conversion in western North American landscapes. BioScience 70, 659–673 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Körner, C. & Paulsen, J. A world-wide study of high altitude treeline temperatures. J. Biogeogr. 31, 713–732 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harsch, M. A., Hulme, P. E., McGlone, M. S. & Duncan, R. P. Are treelines advancing? A global meta-analysis of treeline response to climate warming. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1040–1049 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elsen, P. R. & Tingley, M. W. Global mountain topography and the fate of montane species under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 772–776 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson, S. T., Betancourt, J. L., Booth, R. K. & Gray, S. T. Ecology and the ratchet of events: climate variability, niche dimensions, and species distributions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19685–19692 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pulliam, H. R. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol. Lett. 3, 349–361 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tyree, M. T. Plant hydraulics: the ascent of water. Nature 423, 923–923 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolb, P. F. & Robberecht, R. High temperature and drought stress effects on survival of Pinus ponderosa seedlings. Tree Physiol. 16, 665–672 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. League, K. & Veblen, T. Climatic variability and episodic Pinus pondoras establishment along the forest-grassland ecotones of Colorado. For. Ecol. Manag. 228, 98–107 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rother, M. & Veblen, T. Climate drives episodic conifer establishment after fire in dry ponderosa pine forests of the Colorado Front Range, USA. Forests 8, 159 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davis, K. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Holden, Z. A., Higuera, P. E. & Abatzoglou, J. T. Microclimatic buffering in forests of the future: the role of local water balance. Ecography 42, 1–11 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Frenne, P. et al. Forest microclimates and climate change: importance, drivers and future research agenda. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2279–2297 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Frenne, P. et al. Global buffering of temperatures under forest canopies. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 744–749 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper, L. A., Ballantyne, A. P., Holden, Z. A. & Landguth, E. L. Disturbance impacts on land surface temperature and gross primary productivity in the western United States. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 930–946 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Daubenmire, R. & Slipp, A. W. Plant succession on Talus slopes in Northern Idaho as influenced by slope exposure. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 70, 473–480 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baker, F. S. Effect of excessively high temperatures on coniferous reproduction. J. For. 27, 949–975 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Choat, B. et al. Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491, 752–755 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sapes, G. & Sala, A. Relative water content consistently predicts drought mortality risk in seedling populations with different morphology, physiology and times to death. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 3322–3335 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Williams, A. P. et al. Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 292–297 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Simeone, C. et al. Coupled ecohydrology and plant hydraulics modeling predicts ponderosa pine seedling mortality and lower treeline in the US Northern Rocky Mountains. New Phytol. 221, 1814–1830 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rank, R., Maneta, M., Higuera, P., Holden, Z. & Dobrowski, S. Conifer seedling survival in response to high surface temperature events of varying intensity and duration. Front. For. Glob. Change https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.731267 (2022).

  31. Davis, K. T. et al. Wildfires and climate change push low-elevation forests across a critical climate threshold for tree regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6193–6198 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gates, D. M. Biophysical Ecology (Courier Corporation, 2012).

  33. Hartley, C. Stem lesions caused by excessive heat. J. Agric. Res. 595–604 (1918).

  34. Jin, M. & Dickinson, R. E. Land surface skin temperature climatology: benefitting from the strengths of satellite observations. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 044004 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mildrexler, D. J., Zhao, M. & Running, S. W. A global comparison between station air temperatures and MODIS land surface temperatures reveals the cooling role of forests. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 116, G03025 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maneta, M. P. & Silverman, N. L. A spatially distributed model to simulate water, energy, and vegetation dynamics using information from regional climate models. Earth Interact. 17, 1–44 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ramcharan, A. et al. Soil property and class maps of the conterminous United States at 100-meter spatial resolution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 82, 186–201 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Holden, Z. A. et al. Decreasing fire season precipitation increased recent western US forest wildfire activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E8349–E8357 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Daly, C. et al. Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int. J. Climatol. 28, 2031–2064 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Steinschneider, S. & Brown, C. A semiparametric multivariate, multisite weather generator with low-frequency variability for use in climate risk assessments. Water Resour. Res. 49, 7205–7220 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mahony, C. R., Wang, T., Hamann, A. & Cannon, A. J. A global climate model ensemble for downscaled monthly climate normals over North America. Int. J. Climatol. 43, 5871–5891 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Séférian, R. et al. Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM-ESM2-1: role of earth system processes in present-day and future climate. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 4182–4227 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Döscher, R. et al. The EC-Earth3 Earth system model for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 2973–3020 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hoylman, Z. A 30 m topographic wetness index dataset for the continental United States. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4460353 (2021).

  46. Carroll, M. et al. in Land Remote Sensing and Global Environmental Change: NASA’s Earth Observing System and the Science of ASTER and MODIS (eds Ramachandran, B., Justice, C. O. & Abrams, M. J.) 725–745 (Springer, 2011).

  47. Allred, B. W. et al. Improving Landsat predictions of rangeland fractional cover with multitask learning and uncertainty. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 841–849 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Freeman, E. A. & Moisen, G. PresenceAbsence: an R package for presence absence analysis. J. Stat. Soft. 23, 1–31 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Seidel, K. Tolerance of seedlings of ponderosa pine. Douglas-fir, grand fir, and Engelmann spruce for high temperatures. Northwest Sci. 60, (1986).

  50. Silen, R. R. Lethal Surface Temperatures and Their Interpretation for Douglas-Fir. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 170p. PhD thesis (1960).

  51. Holden, Z. A. et al. Data repository: Low-elevation forest extent in the western United States constrained by soil surface temperatures. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26950843 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Computational resources from the University of Montana’s Computational Ecology Lab, NASA Pleiades HPC cluster and the Griz Shared Computing Cluster contributed to this research (NSF award numbers 2018112 and 1925267). We thank the editors and three anonymous reviewers for comments and feedback that improved the final manuscript. We thank the Montana Climate Office for access to soil moisture observations. This work was supported with funding from the National Aeronautical and Space Administration (grant 80NSSC19K00181) and the USDA NIFA (grant 2022-67019-36438).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.A.H., S.Z.D. and M.M. designed the research. Z.A.H., D.L., A.S., A.W. and S.Z.D. performed the research and data analysis. S.Z.D, Z.A.H., Z.H., M.M. and A.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to revising the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary A. Holden.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks Courtney Collins, Florian Zellweger and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Xujia Jiang, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary methods, Figs. 1–12 and Tables 1–5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holden, Z.A., Dobrowski, S.Z., Swanson, A. et al. Low-elevation forest extent in the western United States constrained by soil surface temperatures. Nat. Geosci. 17, 1249–1253 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01577-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01577-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing