Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Multidecadal persistence of soil carbon gains on retired cropland following fertilizer cessation

Abstract

Humans have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), causing major changes in global climate while concurrently increasing the supply of biologically limiting nutrients especially nitrogen (N). Despite myriad negative effects on ecosystems and human health, nutrient pollution can increase the storage of soil carbon (C) in grasslands and retired farmland, potentially reducing atmospheric CO2. However, the persistence of nutrient-induced soil carbon gains remains a knowledge gap at the heart of a potential policy dilemma: whether reducing nutrient pollution could lead to the release of soil carbon that accumulated under high nutrient supply. Here we use a four-decade experiment conducted on retired, marginal cropland to demonstrate that nutrient addition increased soil C storage after intensive tilling, and that these soil C gains persisted for at least three decades following fertilizer and tilling cessation. This occurred despite plant biomass rapidly returning to pre-fertilization levels and plant community composition recovering from the effects of fertilization. These results demonstrate that nutrient-induced increases in soil C can persist for decades following reduced nutrient pollution as long as the soil remains untilled.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Soil C and N concentrations four decades after the start of the experiment.
Fig. 2: Soil C concentrations in plots with 42 years of continuous fertilization and plots in which fertilization ceased after 10 years.
Fig. 3: Soil N concentrations in plots with 42 years of continuous fertilization and plots in which fertilization ceased after 10 years.
Fig. 4: Aboveground live biomass in plots with 42 years of continuous fertilization and plots in which fertilization ceased after 10 years.
Fig. 5: Proportion of dead biomass (dead biomass/total biomass) in plots with 42 years of continuous fertilization and plots in which fertilization ceased after 10 years.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available via the Environmental Data Initiative data repository at https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/10dfeaaf9068e99246ca8b6c4ad14c50 (ref. 58), https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/b7bc6704f9b15fcd29842fa23c96f314 (ref. 59) and https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/f2ab91096cb3bb672182ba091cb467c1 (ref. 60).

References

  1. Bai, Y. F. & Cotrufo, M. F. Grassland soil carbon sequestration: current understanding, challenges, and solutions. Science 377, 603–608 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bossio, D. A. et al. The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nat. Sustain. 3, 391–398 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lal, R. Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environ. Pollut. 116, 353–362 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McLauchlan, K. The nature and longevity of agricultural impacts on soil carbon and nutrients: a review. Ecosystems 9, 1364–1382 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson, R. T. et al. Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. A Special Report of the IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  6. Schuman, G. E., Janzen, H. H. & Herrick, J. E. Soil carbon dynamics and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands. Environ. Pollut. 116, 391–396 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hungate, B. A. et al. The economic value of grassland species for carbon storage. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601880 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Drever, C. R. et al. Natural climate solutions for Canada. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd6034 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis, P. W. et al. The principles of natural climate solutions. Nat. Commun. 15, 547 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fay, P. A. et al. Grassland productivity limited by multiple nutrients. Nat. Plants 1, 15080 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fornara, D. A. & Tilman, D. Soil carbon sequestration in prairie grasslands increased by chronic nitrogen addition. Ecology 93, 2030–2036 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tjoelker, M. G., Craine, J. M., Wedin, D., Reich, P. B. & Tilman, D. Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species. N. Phytol. 167, 493–508 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gill, A. L. et al. Nitrogen increases early-stage and slows late-stage decomposition across diverse grasslands. J. Ecol. 110, 1376–1389 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gill, A. L., Schilling, J. & Hobbie, S. E. Experimental nitrogen fertilisation globally accelerates, then slows decomposition of leaf litter. Ecol. Lett. 24, 802–811 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lugato, E., Leip, A. & Jones, A. Mitigation potential of soil carbon management overestimated by neglecting N2O emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 219–223 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van Groenigen, J. W. et al. Sequestering soil organic carbon: a nitrogen dilemma. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 4738–4739 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlesinger, W. H. On the fate of anthropogenic nitrogen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 203–208 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2022).

  19. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2014).

  20. Midolo, G. et al. Impacts of nitrogen addition on plant species richness and abundance: a global meta-analysis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 398–413 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seabloom, E. W. et al. Plant species’ origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands. Nat. Commun. 6, 7710 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bharath, S. et al. Nutrient addition increases grassland sensitivity to droughts. Ecology 101, e02981 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seabloom, E. W., Borer, E. T., Hobbie, S. E. & MacDougall, A. S. Soil nutrients increase long-term soil carbon gains threefold on retired farmland. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 4909–4920 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Luo, X. Z., Zhang, L. L., Lin, Y. B., Wen, D. Z. & Hou, E. Q. Nitrogen availability mediates soil organic carbon cycling in response to phosphorus supply: a global meta-analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 185, 8 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schlesinger, W. H. Carbon sequestration in soils. Science 284, 2095 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zis, T. P. V. & Cullinane, K. The desulphurisation of shipping: past, present and the future under a global cap. Transp. Res. Part D 82, 15 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan, T. et al. Abrupt reduction in shipping emission as an inadvertent geoengineering termination shock produces substantial radiative warming. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 281 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van Dijk, M., Morley, T., Rau, M. L. & Saghai, Y. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nat. Food 2, 494–501 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pörtner, H.-O. et al. Scientific outcome of the IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop report on biodiversity and climate change. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4782538 (2021).

  30. Huang, J. & Hartemink, A. E. Soil and environmental issues in sandy soils. Earth Sci. Rev. 208, 103295 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, S. et al. The Unified North American Soil Map and its implication on the soil organic carbon stock in North America. Biogeosciences 10, 2915–2930 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Plantinga, A. J. The effect of agricultural policies on land use and environmental quality. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 78, 1082–1091 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Halloran, L. R. et al. Regional contingencies in the relationship between aboveground biomass and litter in the world’s grasslands. PLoS ONE 8, e54988 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Olson, J. S. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44, 322–331 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hobbie, S. E. Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 357–363 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dijkstra, F. A., Hobbie, S. E., Knops, J. M. H. & Reich, P. B. Nitrogen deposition and plant species interact to influence soil carbon stabilization. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1192–1198 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Peng, Y. F. et al. Nonlinear response of soil respiration to increasing nitrogen additions in a Tibetan alpine steppe. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 11 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Prager, C. M. et al. A gradient of nutrient enrichment reveals nonlinear impacts of fertilization on Arctic plant diversity and ecosystem function. Ecol. Evol. 7, 2449–2460 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilcots, M. E. et al. Realistic rates of nitrogen addition increase carbon flux rates but do not change soil carbon stocks in a temperate grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 4819–4831 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. NRCS. Official Soil Series Descriptions (2025).

  41. Grigal, D. F., Chamberlln, L. M., Wroblewski, D. V. & Gross, E. R. Soils of the Cedar Creek Natural History Area (Univ. Minnesota, 1974).

  42. Lloret, J. & Valiela, I. Unprecedented decrease in deposition of nitrogen oxides over North America: the relative effects of emission controls and prevailing air-mass trajectories. Biogeochemistry 129, 165–180 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Seabloom, E. W., Borer, E. T. & Tilman, D. Grassland ecosystem recovery after soil disturbance depends on nutrient supply rate. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1756–1765 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hassink, J. Effects of soil texture and structure on carbon and nitrogen minerlatization in grassland soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 14, 126–134 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kristensen, H. L., McCarty, G. W. & Meisinger, J. J. Effects of soil structure disturbance on mineralization of organic soil nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 371–378 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Keller, A. B. et al. Soil carbon stocks in temperate grasslands differ strongly across sites but are insensitive to decade-long fertilization. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 1659–1677 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Shabtai, I. A. et al. Calcium promotes persistent soil organic matter by altering microbial transformation of plant litter. Nat. Commun. 14, 13 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Huang, X. L. et al. Ten-year long-term organic fertilization enhances carbon sequestration and calcium-mediated stabilization of aggregate-associated organic carbon in a reclaimed Cambisol. Geoderma 355, 11 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Khan, S. A., Mulvaney, R. L., Ellsworth, T. R. & Boast, C. W. The myth of nitrogen fertilization for soil carbon sequestration. J. Environ. Qual. 36, 1821–1832 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Vandever, M. W. et al. Persistence and quality of vegetation cover in expired Conservation Reserve Program fields. Ecosphere 14, 13 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ackerman, D., Millet, D. B. & Chen, X. Global estimates of ionorganic nitrogen deposition across four decades. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 100–107 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. NRCS. Web Soil Survey (2024).

  53. Knops, J. M. H. & Tilman, D. Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment. Ecology 81, 88–98 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Adalibieke, W., Cui, X., Cai, H., You, L. & Zhou, F. Global crop-specific nitrogen fertilization dataset in 1961–2020. Sci. Data 10, 617 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tilman, D. Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 57, 189–214 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Balesdent, J. et al. Atmosphere–soil carbon transfer as a function of soil depth. Nature 559, 599–602 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Dijkstra, F. A., Hobbie, S. E. & Reich, P. B. Soil processes affected by sixteen grassland species grown under different environmental conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70, 770–777 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Tilman, D. Soil carbon: long-term nitrogen deposition during grassland succession. EDI https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/10dfeaaf9068e99246ca8b6c4ad14c50 (2024).

  59. Tilman, D. Soil nitrogen: long-term nitrogen deposition during grassland succession. EDI https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/b7bc6704f9b15fcd29842fa23c96f314 (2024).

  60. Tilman, D. Plant aboveground biomass data: long-term nitrogen deposition during grassland succession. EDI https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/f2ab91096cb3bb672182ba091cb467c1 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff, scientists and interns at Cedar Creek who have participated in this work over the decades. This work was supported by grants from the US National Science Foundation Long-Term Ecological Research Program (LTER) including DEB-1234162 and DEB-1831944. Support also was provided by the Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve and the University of Minnesota.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.W.S. wrote the paper, with contributions from S.E.H., A.S.M. and E.T.B. E.W.S. analysed the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric W. Seabloom.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks Enqing Hou and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Xujia Jiang and Carolina Ortiz Guerrero, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–4 and Tables 1–6

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seabloom, E.W., Hobbie, S.E., MacDougall, A.S. et al. Multidecadal persistence of soil carbon gains on retired cropland following fertilizer cessation. Nat. Geosci. 18, 1014–1019 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01801-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01801-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing