Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Vaccine mandates and public trust do not have to be antagonistic

Nature Human Behaviour volume 7, pages 1605–1606 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

COVID-19 vaccine mandates increased vaccine coverage in most settings, but the protective effect was not homogenous across populations (for example, children)3. Public opposition to COVID-19 vaccine mandates was reported globally. This opposition has resulted in diminished uptake of standard childhood vaccines, as well as low public interest in COVID-19 boosters — even when access and availability are secure. Paediatric COVID-19 vaccination efforts were also challenged by a new wave of vaccine-hesitant parents, who constituted almost one-third of the parents in USA4. COVID-19 vaccine mandates are regarded by some as more harmful than beneficial, owing to the potential for long-term public discontent5.

The optimal conditions for introducing vaccine mandates are difficult to define. It is evident, however, that not enough effort was made to explain the rationale for vaccination mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic and public consultations on how mandates could be optimized were not undertaken5. Instead, researchers and policymakers equated high vaccine uptake with proof that vaccine mandates are beneficial and overlooked how mandates can undermine public trust in the long term2,5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Durbach, N. Bodily Matters: The Anti-vaccination Movement in England, 1853–1907 (Duke Univ. Press, 2005).

  2. Ward, J. K., Peretti-Watel, P., Bocquier, A., Seror, V. & Verger, P. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1257–1259 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mills, M. C. & Rüttenauer, T. Lancet Public Health 7, e15–e22 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruiz, J. B. & Bell, R. A. Public Health Rep. 137, 1162–1169 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bardosh, K. et al. BMJ Glob. Health 7, e008684 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greyson, D., Carpiano, R. M. & Bettinger, J. A. Vaccine 40, 7415–7425 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ward, J. K., Alleaume, C. & Peretti-Watel, P. Soc. Sci. Med. 265, 113414 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Larson, H. J. et al. EBioMedicine 12, 295–301 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Stead, M. et al. Vaccine 40, 7389–7396 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Larson, H. J. Stuck: How Vaccine Rumors Start – and Why They Don’t Go Away (Oxford Univ. Press, 2020).

  11. Adhikari, B., Yeong Cheah P. & von Seidlein, L. Vaccine X 12, 100213 (2022).

  12. Kc, A. et al. Bull. World Health Organ. 95, 261–269 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. WHO. COVID-19 and mandatory vaccination: ethical considerations. apps.who.int, https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1425927/retrieve (2022).

  14. Attwell, K., Rizzi, M. & Paul, K. T. Vaccine 40, 7353–7359 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

    Maya J. Goldenberg

  2. Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Bipin Adhikari, Lorenz von Seidlein & Phaik Yeong Cheah

  3. Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Bipin Adhikari, Lorenz von Seidlein & Phaik Yeong Cheah

  4. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

    Heidi J. Larson

  5. Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Heidi J. Larson

Authors
  1. Maya J. Goldenberg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bipin Adhikari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lorenz von Seidlein
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Phaik Yeong Cheah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heidi J. Larson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bipin Adhikari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Human Behaviour thanks Rachel Gur-Arie and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldenberg, M.J., Adhikari, B., von Seidlein, L. et al. Vaccine mandates and public trust do not have to be antagonistic. Nat Hum Behav 7, 1605–1606 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01720-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01720-8

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing