Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Restrictions on US academic freedom affect science everywhere

Nature Human Behaviour volume 9, pages 1303–1304 (2025)Cite this article

Subjects

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

Historically, the USA has enjoyed greater academic freedom than many countries, and this has likely contributed to its centrality in global research networks. For years, state-level attacks (such as those by Governor Ron DeSantis in Florida) have undermined academic freedom at single campuses or across public university systems2. But under the Trump administration, coordinated attacks on academic freedom are being carried out at the national level and are targeting both public and private universities. The administration has targeted institutional autonomy by threatening large-scale federal funding freezes to specific universities, such as Columbia University, Harvard University and University of Pennsylvania. These attacks on universities and federally funded research undermine the arrangements (such as having university faculty members rather than political appointees review proposals for federal grants) that make the USA a globally competitive producer of scholarly scientific publications. Even private industry works in partnership with universities on basic research. Bibliometric analyses estimate that 85–90% of publications in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, plus health (STEM+) — including those funded by industry contracts — are co-authored by university-based scientists3,4.

Although new for American higher education, the Trump administration’s approach is similar to policies followed by Cold War autocratic regimes such as East Germany, where research funding was politicized and research production stalled. Much of the world experienced exponential growth in science production during the latter half of the twentieth century. By contrast, East Germany stood out for its decrease in STEM+ research production5. When former German Chancellor Angela Merkel reflected on working as a physicist in East Germany before reunification, she described the danger of becoming comfortable with the boundaries imposed by the state, and the benefits — after reunification — of a more open society that pushed you “to your limits” as a scientist. Merkel realized how autocratic rule had badly constrained East German physics research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Fernandez, F. & Chykina, V. J. Coll. Univ. Law 49, 125–141 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, V., Fernandez, F. & Hutchens, N. H. Miss. Law Rev. 88, 61–106 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, D. P. & Powell, J. J. Global Mega-Science: Universities, Research Collaborations, and Knowledge Production. (Stanford Univ. Press, 2024).

  4. Geiger, R. L. & Sá, C. M. Tapping the Riches of Science: Universities and the Promise of Economic Growth (Harvard Univ. Press, 2008).

  5. Powell, J. J. W., Baker, D. P. & Fernandez, F. eds. The Century of Science: The Global Triumph of the Research University (International Perspectives on Education & Society 33) (Emerald, 2017).

  6. Hutchens, N. H. & Fernandez, F. in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 38 (ed. Perna, L. W.) 1–54 (Springer, 2023).

  7. Fernandez, F., Chykina, V. & Lin, Y. C. PLoS ONE 19, e0298370 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Audretsch, D. B., Fisch, C., Franzoni, C., Momtaz, P. P. & Vismara, S. PLoS ONE 19, e0304560 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Vögtle, E. M. & Windzio, M. High. Educ. 87, 433–452 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berggren, N. & Bjørnskov, C. South. Econ. J. 88, 1313–1342 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank D. P. Baker, R. L. Geiger, J. J. W. Powell and B. Taylor for feedback on a prior draft of this piece.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Frank Fernandez

  2. University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    Neal Hutchens

Authors
  1. Frank Fernandez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neal Hutchens
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Fernandez.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernandez, F., Hutchens, N. Restrictions on US academic freedom affect science everywhere. Nat Hum Behav 9, 1303–1304 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02248-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02248-9

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing