Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Intermolecular-force-driven anisotropy breaks the thermoelectric trade-off in n-type conjugated polymers

Abstract

Controlling the molecular orientation of conjugated polymers is a vital yet complex process to modulate their optoelectronic properties along with boosting device performance. Here we propose a molecular-force-driven anisotropy strategy to modulate the molecular orientation of conjugated polymers. This strategy relies on the intermolecular interactions, gauged by the Hansen solubility parameters framework, to provide solvent selection criteria for conjugated polymers that render films with a preferential orientation. We showcase molecular-force-driven anisotropy to overcome the inverse coupling between the electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient in solution-processed organic thermoelectrics, a major challenge in the field. Our kinetic Monte Carlo simulations suggest that edge-on orientations break the trade-off by increasing the in-plane delocalization length. The molecular-force-driven anisotropy approach yields a power factor of 115 μW m−1 K−2 and a figure of merit of 0.17 at room temperature for the doped n-type 2DPP-2CNTVT:N-DMBI system. This power factor is 20 times larger than that of conventional doping approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Fundamentals of organic TE and MFDA.
Fig. 2: KMC modelling of isotropic and anisotropic systems.
Fig. 3: Phenomenological model of MFDA.
Fig. 4: Influence of different molecular dopants on the microstructure of 2DPP-2CNTVT.
Fig. 5: Charge transport and TE properties of texturized 2DPP-2CNTVT.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the Article and its Supplementary Information. Alternative formats for raw data files may be requested from the corresponding authors. 2D GIWAXS diffractograms of P3HT, N2200 and 2DPP-2CNTVT are available via the KAUST repository at https://doi.org/10.25781/KAUST-1709U (ref. 55). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Code for the KMC and three-phase model is available from M.K. upon request.

References

  1. Marina, S. et al. Semi-paracrystallinity in semi-conducting polymers. Mater. Horiz. 9, 1196–1206 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cowen, L. M., Atoyo, J., Carnie, M. J., Baran, D. & Schroeder, B. C. Review—organic materials for thermoelectric energy generation. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 6, N3080–N3088 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tietze, M. L. et al. Elementary steps in electrical doping of organic semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 9, 1182 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bubnova, O. & Crispin, X. Towards polymer-based organic thermoelectric generators. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 9345–9362 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bubnova, O. et al. Optimization of the thermoelectric figure of merit in the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Nat. Mater. 10, 429–433 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Villalva, D. R., Haque, M. A., Nugraha, M. I. & Baran, D. Enhanced thermoelectric performance and lifetime in acid-doped PEDOT:PSS films via work function modification. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 9126–9132 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel, S. N. et al. Morphology controls the thermoelectric power factor of a doped semiconducting polymer. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700434 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Z. et al. Enhancement of the thermoelectric performance of DPP based polymers by introducing one 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene electron-rich building block. J. Mater. Chem. C 8, 10859–10867 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schlitz, R. A. et al. Solubility-limited extrinsic n-type doping of a high electron mobility polymer for thermoelectric applications. Adv. Mater. 26, 2825–2830 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, J. et al. Amphipathic side chain of a conjugated polymer optimizes dopant location toward efficient n-type organic thermoelectrics. Adv. Mater. 33, e2006694 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosas Villalva, D. et al. Backbone-driven host-dopant miscibility modulates molecular doping in NDI conjugated polymers. Mater. Horiz. 9, 500–508 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, J. et al. N-type organic thermoelectrics: demonstration of ZT > 0.3. Nat. Commun. 11, 5694 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi, K. et al. Toward high performance n-type thermoelectric materials by rational modification of BDPPV backbones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 6979–6982 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan, X. et al. Pyrazine-flanked diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP): a new polymer building block for high-performance n-type organic thermoelectrics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 20215–20221 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gamez-Valenzuela, S. et al. High-performance n-type organic thermoelectrics with exceptional conductivity by polymer-dopant matching. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202408537 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brunetti, I., Dash, A., Scheunemann, D. & Kemerink, M. Is the field of organic thermoelectrics stuck? J. Mater. Res. 39, 1197–1206 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liang, Z. et al. n-type charge transport in heavily p-doped polymers. Nat. Mater. 20, 518–524 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, K. et al. On the origin of Seebeck coefficient inversion in highly doped conducting polymers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, e2112276 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Untilova, V. et al. High thermoelectric power factor of poly(3-hexylthiophene) through in-plane alignment and doping with a molybdenum dithiolene complex. Macromolecules 53, 6314–6321 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Upadhyaya, M., Boyle, C. J., Venkataraman, D. & Aksamija, Z. Effects of disorder on thermoelectric properties of semiconducting polymers. Sci. Rep. 9, 5820 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hynynen, J. et al. Enhanced thermoelectric power factor of tensile drawn poly(3-hexylthiophene). ACS Macro Lett. 8, 70–76 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Qu, S. et al. Highly anisotropic P3HT films with enhanced thermoelectric performance via organic small molecule epitaxy. NPG Asia Mater. 8, e292 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vijayakumar, V. et al. Bringing conducting polymers to high order: toward conductivities beyond 105 S cm−1 and thermoelectric power factors of 2 mW m−1 K−2. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, e1900266 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vijayakumar, V. et al. Influence of dopant size and doping method on the structure and thermoelectric properties of PBTTT films doped with F6TCNNQ and F4TCNQ. J. Mater. Chem. C 8, 16470–16482 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Campoy-Quiles, M. Will organic thermoelectrics get hot? Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 377, 20180352 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheunemann, D. et al. Rubbing and drawing: generic ways to improve the thermoelectric power factor of organic semiconductors? Adv. Electron. Mater. 6, e2000218 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Derewjanko, D. et al. Delocalization enhances conductivity at high doping concentrations. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, e 2112262 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, M. et al. Controlling the surface organization of conjugated donor-acceptor polymers by their aggregation in solution. Adv. Mater. 28, 9430–9438 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Luzio, A., Criante, L., D’Innocenzo, V. & Caironi, M. Control of charge transport in a semiconducting copolymer by solvent-induced long-range order. Sci. Rep. 3, 3425 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, S. et al. Solvent effects and multiple aggregate states in high-mobility organic field-effect transistors based on poly(bithiophene-alt-thienothiophene). Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 162103 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fratini, S., Nikolka, M., Salleo, A., Schweicher, G. & Sirringhaus, H. Charge transport in high-mobility conjugated polymers and molecular semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 19, 491–502 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shi, X. et al. Relating chain conformation to the density of states and charge transport in conjugated polymers: the role of the β-phase in poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene). Phys. Rev. X. 9, 021038 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobs, I. E. et al. Structural and dynamic disorder, not ionic trapping, controls charge transport in highly doped conducting polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 3005–3019 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Giannini, S. et al. Transiently delocalized states enhance hole mobility in organic molecular semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 22, 1361–1369 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dash, A. et al. Spontaneous modulation doping in semi-crystalline conjugated polymers leads to high conductivity at low doping concentration. Adv. Mater. 36, e2311303 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Corzo, D. et al. High-performing organic electronics using terpene green solvents from renewable feedstocks. Nat. Energy 8, 62–73 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chang, J.-F. et al. Enhanced mobility of poly(3-hexylthiophene) transistors by spin-coating from high-boiling-point solvents. Chem. Mater. 16, 4772–4776 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim, H. S., Huseynova, G., Noh, Y.-Y. & Hwang, D.-H. Modulation of majority charge carrier from hole to electron by incorporation of cyano groups in diketopyrrolopyrrole-based polymers. Macromol 50, 7550–7558 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang, C. Y. et al. Enhancing the n-type conductivity and thermoelectric performance of donor-acceptor copolymers through donor engineering. Adv. Mater. 30, e1802850 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xiong, M. et al. Efficient n-doping of polymeric semiconductors through controlling the dynamics of solution-state polymer aggregates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 8189–8197 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yan, X. et al. Approaching disorder-tolerant semiconducting polymers. Nat. Commun. 12, 5723 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Han, J. et al. Blended conjugated host and unconjugated dopant polymers towards n-type all-polymer conductors and high-ZT thermoelectrics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202219313 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wolf, C. M. et al. Strategies for the development of conjugated polymer molecular dynamics force fields validated with neutron and X-ray scattering. ACS Polym. Au 1, 134–152 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cao, Z. et al. Molecular structure and conformational design of donor-acceptor conjugated polymers to enable predictable optoelectronic property. Adv. Mater. 35, e2302178 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu, J. et al. N-type organic thermoelectrics of donor-acceptor copolymers: improved power factor by molecular tailoring of the density of states. Adv. Mater. 30, e1804290 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, S. et al. A chemically doped naphthalenediimide-bithiazole polymer for n-type organic thermoelectrics. Adv. Mater. 30, e1801898 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ma, W. et al. Enhanced molecular packing of a conjugated polymer with high organic thermoelectric power factor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 24737–24743 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang, C. Y. et al. A thermally activated and highly miscible dopant for n-type organic thermoelectrics. Nat. Commun. 11, 3292 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Craighero, M. et al. Impact of oligoether side-chain length on the thermoelectric properties of a polar polythiophene. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 6, 2909–2916 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Guo, H. et al. Transition metal-catalysed molecular n-doping of organic semiconductors. Nature 599, 67–73 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lu, Y. et al. The critical role of dopant cations in electrical conductivity and thermoelectric performance of n-doped polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 15340–15348 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nečas, D. & Klapetek, P. Gwyddion: an open-source software for SPM data analysis. Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 10, 181–188 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sharma, A. et al. Insights into the oxidant/polymer interfacial growth of vapor phase polymerized PEDOT thin films. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 5, 1800594 (2018).

  54. Yoshida, H. Near-ultraviolet inverse photoemission spectroscopy using ultra-low energy electrons. Chem. Phys. Lett. 539–540, 180–185 (2012).

  55. Rosas Villalva, D. & Baran, D. GIWAXS of conjugated polymers, 2DPP-2CNTVT, P3HT, and N2000. KAUST Research Repository https://doi.org/10.25781/KAUST-1709U (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

D.R.V. and D.B. thank the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Office of Research Administration (ORA), award no. ORA-CRG2022-4668. We also would like to thank C. Muller for fruitful discussions on the influence of ionized species on the assembly of the morphology of doped CPs. M.K. thanks the Carl Zeiss Foundation for financial support. D.B., G.C. and S.M. acknowledge support from the UK–Saudi Challenge Fund grant from the British Council’s Going Global Partnerships programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.R.V. and D.B. supervised the work. D.R.V. conceived the idea and wrote the manuscript, as well as performed the AFM and GIWAXS characterizations. D.D. and M.K. performed and supervised the computational modelling. D.R.V., Y.L. and Y.Z. fabricated the devices and measured the electronic properties. D.R.V., Y.Z. and S.J. determined the HSPs. A.B. and X.G. carried out the AFM-IR characterization and analysis. A.S. performed the ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy and low-energy inverse photoemission spectroscopy measurements. J.H. performed the density functional theory calculations. O.Z.A. and Y.Z. performed the thermal conductivity measurements and analysis. M.G.-R. provided technical assistance with setup designs for characterization. S.M. and G.C. performed the STM measurements. All authors contributed to manuscript editing and revision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Diego Rosas Villalva, Martijn Kemerink or Derya Baran.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Materials thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 N-DMBI’s Ra vs solvents and polymer.

The Ra between N-DMBI and 2DPP-2CNTVT is equal to that of N-DMBI and o-DCB this means that N-DMBI is equally likely to interact with either of them. N-DMBI’s Ra to CB is larger than that of 2DPP-2CNTVT meaning that the dopant will more likely interact with the CP.

Extended Data Fig. 2 CP solution aggregation behaviour upon addition of dopant.

a) In a perfect solvent, polymer chains are fully dissociated. b) In an intermediate solvent, polymer chains are both fully dissociated and forming small lamellar aggregates. c) Partial solvents give result to large polymer aggregates. Addition of dopant in a perfect solvent result in good CP-dopant intercalation owing to full dissociation of polymer aggregates, without a significant change in the aggregation behaviour. This is similar to adding a dopant in an intermediate solvent, where the CP has lower or affinity for the dopant than for the solvent (d). This should produce minimal effect on the resulting thin film morphology. In contrast, adding a dopant to an intermediate solvent (e) where the CP has similar or higher affinity for the dopant than for the solvent, a competing interaction is triggered that increases the polymer aggregates in solution. This case should result in an increase in the crystalline fraction and the EFR. Finally, in (f), adding dopants in a bad solvent should result in a decrease in the aggregates, due to the dopant attempting to intercalate with the CP. This should produce a film with hindered crystallinity and lower EFR.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Note 1, Figs. 1–29 and Tables 1–5.

Supplementary Data 1

2DPP-2CNTVT density-functional-theory-optimized atomic coordinates.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2

TE properties calculated using KMC, plotted in Fig.2c–e. Charge paths in the anisotropically and isotropically generated morphologies plotted in Fig. 2f,g.

Source Data Fig. 3

SS function and solvent coordinates shown in Fig. 3c, EFR dependence on Ra and BP plotted in Fig. 3d,f and change in EFR versus Ra plotted in Fig. 3g.

Source Data Fig. 4

d spacing, relative crystallinity and EFR from the GIWAXS data plotted in Fig. 4d–g.

Source Data Fig. 5

OFET transfer curves shown in Fig. 5a,b. Thermal conductivity plotted in Fig. 5c. Seebeck coefficient versus conductivity plotted in Fig. 5d. PF versus EFR plotted in Fig. 5e. Previously reported TE properties plotted in Fig. 5f. Temperature-dependent PF and ZT plotted in Fig. 5g.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosas Villalva, D., Derewjanko, D., Zhang, Y. et al. Intermolecular-force-driven anisotropy breaks the thermoelectric trade-off in n-type conjugated polymers. Nat. Mater. 24, 1236–1244 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02207-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02207-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing