Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Grouping all carbon nanotubes into a single substance category is scientifically unjustified

Nature Nanotechnology volume 15, page 164 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

To the Editor — The International Chemical Secretariat (ChemSec) recently added carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to the so-called SIN (‘Substitute It Now’) list of chemicals that they believe should be restricted or banned in the EU1. CNTs are the first nanomaterials to be placed on the SIN list. Should this ‘designation’ concern us as scientists active in the areas of nanotoxicology and nanomedicine? Yes, as it implies that all CNTs can be considered as one material category, which is not the case. Grouping or categorization of chemicals is a valid approach in risk assessment provided that substances with similar properties are grouped together2. However, the key (scientific) question is whether all CNTs display the same properties.

Five years ago, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified a particular type of long and rigid CNT, designated as MWCNT-7, as possibly carcinogenic to humans on the basis of available animal studies, whereas all other CNTs were considered ‘not classifiable’ with regard to their carcinogenicity3. The findings of the original evaluation on the inadequate or limited evidence of carcinogenicity for most CNTs were confirmed in a thorough follow-up study a few years later4. Hence, while there is no doubt that long and rigid CNTs may cause considerable damage to the lungs following pulmonary exposure (especially when administered at high doses5), it is important to note that short and/or tangled CNTs are much less harmful6,7. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that the ‘asbestos-like’ pathogenicity of long CNTs can be alleviated through chemical functionalization, possibly as a result of the effective shortening of the CNTs through debundling or untangling8. Chemical functionalization may also impact the stiffness of CNTs, which is perhaps one of the most important parameters with regard to biological reactivity9.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hansen, S. F. & Lennquist, A. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 3–4 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fadeel, B. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 537–543 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grosse, Y. et al. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1427–1428 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuempel, E. D. et al. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 47, 1–58 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bornholdt, J. et al. ACS Nano 11, 3597–3613 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Poland, C. A. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 423–428 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy, F. A. et al. Am. J. Pathol. 178, 2587–2600 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ali-Boucetta, H. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 2274–2278 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagai, H. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E1330–E1338 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu, W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12374–12379 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, D. K. et al. ACS Nano. 12, 10867–10879 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kagan, V. E. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 354–359 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Elgrabli, D. et al. ACS Nano 9, 10113–10124 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bussy, C. et al. ACS Nano 9, 7815–7830 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goode, A. E. et al. Biomaterials 70, 57–70 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Bengt Fadeel

  2. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Kostas Kostarelos

  3. Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), Barcelona, Spain

    Kostas Kostarelos

Authors
  1. Bengt Fadeel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kostas Kostarelos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bengt Fadeel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fadeel, B., Kostarelos, K. Grouping all carbon nanotubes into a single substance category is scientifically unjustified. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 164 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0654-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0654-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing