Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Safety and efficacy of HSCT for systemic sclerosis across clinical trials

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Burt, R. K. et al. Autologous non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation compared with pulse cyclophosphamide once per month for systemic sclerosis (ASSIST): an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet 378, 498–506 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Laar, J. M. et al. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 311, 2490–2498 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sullivan, K. M. et al. Myeloablative autologous stem-cell transplantation for severe scleroderma. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 35–47 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burt, R. K. & Farge, D. Systemic sclerosis: autologous HSCT is efficacious, but can we make it safer? Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 14, 189–191 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burt, R. K. et al. Cardiac involvement and treatment-related mortality after non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation with unselected autologous peripheral blood for patients with systemic sclerosis: a retrospective analysis. Lancet 381, 1116–1124 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keyes-Elstein, L. et al. Longitudinal trends in clinical disease features after myeloablative autologous stem-cell transplantation or cyclophosphamide in severe scleroderma [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum. 70 (suppl. 10), 902 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sullivan, K. M. & Keyes-Elstein, L. Cross trial comparisons in clinical practice reviews: proceed with caution. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0492-3 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith M. Sullivan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keyes-Elstein, L., Brittain, E., Pinckney, A. et al. Safety and efficacy of HSCT for systemic sclerosis across clinical trials. Nat Rev Rheumatol 16, 661 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0493-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0493-2

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing