Table 2 Regressions of income by worker race before and after the rating-scale change

From: Scale dichotomization reduces customer racial discrimination and income inequality

 

Model 1 (before rating-scale change)

Model 2 (after rating-scale change, all workers)

Model 3 (workers who joined after the rating-scale change)

 

b (s.e.)

t

P

95% CI

b (s.e.)

T

P

95% CI

b (s.e.)

t

P

95% CI

Non-white

−14.777 (1.502)

−9.84

<0.001

−17.72, −11.83

−13.373 (3.090)

−4.33

<0.001

−19.43, −7.32

11.434 (8.392)

1.36

0.173

−5.02, 27.89

Constant

158.867 (1.038)

153.06

<0.001

156.83, 160.90

172.838 (2.019)

85.62

<0.001

168.88, 176.79

172.734 (4.276)

40.39

<0.001

164.35, 181.12

Location FE

Y

Y

Y

Service category FE

Y

Y

Y

r2

0.040

0.031

0.044

n

68,684

18,404

3,489

  1. The unit of analysis is a completed job for which an income rate was applied. Income is the normalized income a worker received from a completed job. Non-white takes a value of 1 if the worker was perceived to be a racial minority and 0 if the worker was perceived to be white. Model 1 focuses on jobs completed during the five-star scale; model 2 focuses on jobs completed after the rating-scale change to thumbs up/down; and model 3 focuses on jobs completed by workers who joined after the rating-scale change to thumbs up/down. Estimates are from ordinary least-squares regressions and robust standard errors are clustered at the customer level. All tests are two-sided.