Abstract
Eukaryotic cells produce over 1,000 different lipid species that tune organelle membrane properties, control signalling and store energy1,2. How lipid species are selectively sorted between organelles to maintain specific membrane identities is largely unclear, owing to the difficulty of imaging lipid transport in cells3. Here we measured the retrograde transport and metabolism of individual lipid species in mammalian cells using time-resolved fluorescence imaging of bifunctional lipid probes in combination with ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry and mathematical modelling. Quantification of lipid flux between organelles revealed that directional, non-vesicular lipid transport is responsible for fast, species-selective lipid sorting, in contrast to the slow, unspecific vesicular membrane trafficking. Using genetic perturbations, we found that coupling between energy-dependent lipid flipping and non-vesicular transport is a mechanism for directional lipid transport. Comparison of metabolic conversion and transport rates showed that non-vesicular transport dominates the organelle distribution of lipids, while species-specific phospholipid metabolism controls neutral lipid accumulation. Our results provide the first quantitative map of retrograde lipid flux in cells4. We anticipate that our pipeline for mapping of lipid flux through physical and chemical space in cells will boost our understanding of lipids in cell biology and disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Eukaryotic cells produce thousands of chemically distinct lipid species with varying side-chain unsaturation, length and regiochemistry that belong to dozens of lipid classes defined on the basis of the lipid headgroup and backbone1. Lipid species are differentially distributed across organelle membranes, which is important to establish organelle identities and functions2,3,5,6. How the organelle-specific distribution of lipids is established and maintained is incompletely understood3.
Lipid biosynthesis occurs mostly in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and lipids are subsequently distributed through vesicular trafficking and membrane-contact sites to other organelles2,7,8. During anterograde transport towards the plasma membrane (PM) lipids are modified, before they are either recycled through retrograde transport to the ER or catabolized in lysosomes, peroxisomes and mitochondria. Understanding how organelle membrane lipid identities arise requires quantitative measurements of intracellular transport kinetics and local metabolism of individual, molecular distinct lipid species.
While anterograde lipid flux from the ER to the PM has been characterized for some lipid classes using metabolic labelling and organelle fractionation3, the trafficking of individual lipid species in particular in the retrograde lipid transport pathway is not well understood, with the exception of sphingomyelin (SM), of which endocytic trafficking has been studied in some detail9. Thus far, one of the key limitations has been that distinct lipid species could not be faithfully imaged using fluorescence microscopy, hindering the analysis of transport dynamics. Here we used minimally modified lipid probes, ultra-high-resolution Fourier-transform (FT) mass spectrometry (MS), fluorescence imaging and mathematical modelling to quantitatively map the kinetics of species-specific lipid transport and metabolism, identify the primary mechanism of lipid sorting into organelle membranes and build a publicly accessible lipid flux atlas (http://doi.org/21.11101/0000-0007-FCE5-B).
Fluorescence imaging of lipid transport
To quantify the kinetics of transport and metabolism of individual lipid species in mammalian cells, we made use of photoactivatable and clickable (bifunctional) lipids10,11,12,13,14,15 and a combination of pulse–chase fluorescence imaging with ultra-high-resolution MS and mathematical modelling. In contrast to other lipid probes that are optimized to either modulate lipid levels (photocaged lipids16,17,18, photoswitchable lipids19,20), to visualize lipid localization (lipid–fluorophore conjugates21,22) or to monitor lipid metabolism (isotope-labelled lipids23,24, clickable lipids25,26,27), bifunctional lipids enable the monitoring of both lipid localization and metabolism using the same probe.
To make distinct lipid species accessible for high-resolution fluorescence imaging and MS, we relied on two minimal modifications (diazirine and alkyne) within the lipid alkyl chain (Fig. 1a). We generated a library of bifunctional lipid probes covering four different lipid classes: phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidic acid (PA), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and SM (Fig. 1b). PC and PE probes were chosen, as these two lipid classes constitute the majority of all phospholipids in mammalian cells (PC, ~33%; PE, ~20%; Extended Data Fig. 1). PA was included as it is a key intermediate in lipid metabolic pathways, whereas SM is the primary sphingolipid. To study the influence of acyl chain composition on lipid transport within the main membrane lipid class, we generated PC probes of varying acyl chain length and unsaturation degree as well as sn-1/sn-2 acyl regioisomers (Fig. 1b). We confirmed for all probes that incorporation of the bifunctional acyl chain did not alter lipid-specific membrane properties such as phase behaviour and membrane order in model membranes using spectroscopy28,29 (Extended Data Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Moreover, we compared the metabolism of bifunctional probes in cells with an isotope-labelled native PC species (Extended Data Fig. 5). These data indicate that the bifunctional probes closely resemble endogenous lipids with the bifunctional chain most closely matching the properties of a palmitoleic acid (16:1) side chain.
a, Schematic of the combined analysis of lipid transport and metabolism. Lipid probes were loaded into the PM using α-methyl-cyclodextrin-mediated exchange reactions, crosslinked and fluorescently labelled for imaging or extracted and analysed by MS to monitor metabolism. b, The bifunctional lipid probes synthesized for this study. Unique structural elements are highlighted in red. c, Lipid delivery to the PM and the selectivity of lipid labelling for PC(Y/18:1). Scale bar, 10 µm. d, Ultra-high mass resolution (resolutionm/z=800 = 420,000) enables baseline separation of peaks spaced by a few millidaltons and their unequivocal assignment to molecular ions of lipids (as annotated; [M-H]−/[M+HCO2]−) in total lipid extract. M2: second isotopic peak; PI(33:1)D7: deuterated internal standard. e, Representative images (PC(Y/18:1), 30 min timepoint) showing lipid signal (left) and individual organelles markers (right) by four-colour fluorescence imaging. Scale bars, 10 µm. f, Lipid signal assignment for cells shown in e based on automated image segmentation. Lipid signal images are shown at identical settings and scale in e and f. g, Representative images from time-course experiments show the temporal development of the lipid signal distribution for PC(Y/18:1) (left). The coloured arrows indicate lipid localization in different organelles (green, PM; yellow, ER; cyan, mitochondria (Mito); violet, Golgi apparatus; magenta, endosomes (Endo); grey, lipid droplets). Scale bar, 10 µm. Images were brightness–contrast adjusted to enable comparison of lipid distributions at different timepoints. Right, quantification of temporal development of intracellular lipid distribution for PC(Y/18:1). Kinetics were constructed from five independent timepoints. Data are mean ± s.d. Individual n values are provided as source data.
Studying retrograde lipid transport requires a well-defined initial localization at the PM. We therefore loaded lipid probes into U2OS cells through a 0.5–4 min pulse of α-methyl-cyclodextrin-mediated lipid exchange from donor liposomes, which incorporates individual lipid molecules into the outer leaflet of the PM30 (Fig. 1a and Extended Data Fig. 2). The PM integrity was not affected by the loading process (Extended Data Fig. 2) and quantification using MS showed that 1–3% of the total cellular lipidome was exchanged with bifunctional lipid probes, while the overall lipidome composition, including cholesterol content, remained essentially unaffected (Extended Data Figs. 1 and 5).
After removal of the liposome-containing loading solution, cells were kept at 37 °C for 0 min to 24 h before lipid photo-crosslinking, cell fixation, removal of non-crosslinked lipids and fluorescence labelling through click chemistry (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Information). The transport of bifunctional lipids was analysed by confocal imaging of the photo-crosslinked and fluorescently labelled lipids at all timepoints (Fig. 1a). Control samples without lipid probes or ultraviolet (UV) irradiation showed very low unspecific background labelling (Fig. 1c and Extended Data Figs. 1 and 2). Lipid imaging was complemented with quantitative shotgun lipidomics by ultra-high-resolution FT MS for each timepoint to quantify the metabolic conversions during the transport. To this end, we used the mass difference between the two nitrogen atoms of the diazirine functional group (28.0061 Da) and two CH2 (28.0313 Da) groups to distinguish between bifunctional lipids and native lipids (Fig. 1d and Extended Data Fig. 5).
To quantify lipid transport, we assigned the lipid fluorescence signal to distinct organelle membranes by determining the colocalization of lipids with organelle markers for the PM, Golgi apparatus, ER, endosomes and mitochondria (Fig. 1e–g and Extended Data Fig. 4). Segmented probability maps were generated for every organelle marker using the pixel classifier approach of the Ilastik software package31. We then retrieved the organelle-specific lipid signal-intensity distributions from pixels that were unambiguously assigned to one organelle. On the basis of these distributions, the lipid signal was partitioned between organelles in regions where organelle masks overlapped (Fig. 1f,g, Extended Data Fig. 4 and Supplementary Information). Taken together, we developed a lipid-imaging pipeline that enables quantification of the interorganelle transport of distinct lipid species starting from the PM and correlation of lipid transport with time-dependent metabolic conversion of lipids observed by MS.
Specific lipid transport is non-vesicular
Visual inspection of the lipid localization in confocal images revealed clear differences in transport kinetics between the lipid classes, and between individual species within the same lipid class (Fig. 2c and Extended Data Figs. 3 and 4). Overall, poly-unsaturated PC species, PA and PE exhibited a pronounced early localization in the ER, whereas saturated PC species and SM were retained much longer in the PM and subsequently showed persistent localization in endosomes (Fig. 2c, Extended Data Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2). These observations indicated that the kinetics of intracellular lipid transport differ both on the level of lipid classes and individual lipid species.
a, Schematic of the analysed cellular lipid-transport pipelines. MCS, membrane-contact site. b, Kinetic models for quantifying lipid transport from fluorescence microscopy and MS data. Non-ves., non-vesicular. c, Kinetics of lipid transport for PC(Y/16:0), PC(Y/18:1), PC(Y/20:4), SM(Y) and the corresponding model 1a fits. Unique structural elements of individual lipids are highlighted in red. Scale bars, 10 µm. Images were brightness–contrast adjusted to enable comparison of lipid distributions at different timepoints. Kinetics were constructed from five independent timepoints. Data are mean ± s.d. Individual n values are provided as source data. d, Comparison of rate constants describing retrograde vesicular transport from the PM to endosomes (models 1a–3a shown). e, Comparison of rate constants describing retrograde non-vesicular transport from the PM to the ER and total transport in the anterograde direction. f, Comparison of rate constants describing retrograde vesicular transport from the PM to endosomes and retrograde non-vesicular transport from the PM to the ER for all analysed lipid probes. The mean ± s.d. of the fitted rate constants was calculated from 100 MC model runs. Pairwise effect-size values are shown for PC species comparison of model 1a rates. Values for all lipids pairs are given in Extended Data Fig. 7. For d and f, Cohen’s d values are indicated; very small (VS), >0.01; small (S), >0.20; medium (M), >0.50; large (L), >0.80; very large (VL), >1.20; huge (H), >2.00.
To understand whether the observed transport selectivity arises from differential sorting of lipid species during vesicular or non-vesicular transport (Fig. 2a), we fitted a kinetic model describing the main lipid transport routes to the lipid transport data (Fig. 2b). The model included retrograde vesicular transport through endocytosis from the PM through endosomes and the Golgi apparatus to the ER and the competing, non-vesicular route from the PM to the ER, as well as lipid exchange between the ER and mitochondria. Anterograde transport from the ER to the PM was captured by a summary rate encompassing both vesicular and non-vesicular modes. Two a priori assumptions were made: (1) retrograde transport of lipids from the PM directly to the ER is exclusively non-vesicular; and (2) retrograde lipid transport along the secretory pathway (PM to endosomes to Golgi to ER) is exclusively vesicular (Fig. 2b,c and Extended Data Figs. 6 and 7; details on model design and performance are provided in the ‘Mathematical modelling’ section of the Supplementary Information).
Kinetic models were fitted globally for each lipid species, except for PA(18:1/Y), which was transported too fast for the time resolution of the time-course experiments, to obtain interorganelle transport rate constants (Fig. 2d and Extended Data Fig. 4a). To assess the robustness of derived kinetic parameters, we compared different model versions featuring lipid-transport networks of increasing complexity and accounting for the change of absolute bifunctional lipid content, which was quantified by MS (Fig. 2b, Extended Data Fig. 6 and Supplementary Information (Mathematical modelling)). The obtained rate constants between different models were similar, indicating robustness of the results (Fig. 2d–f, Extended Data Fig. 7 and Supplementary Tables 1–4).
Comparison of the lipid-transport rate constants for retrograde transport from the PM to endosomes with retrograde transport directly from the PM to the ER revealed that non-vesicular trafficking was up to 11-fold (effect sizes up to 10 pooled s.d.) faster for all lipids compared with vesicular transport (Fig. 2f). Furthermore, the rate constants of non-vesicular trafficking showed significant variation between lipid classes and species (Fig. 2e,f and Extended Data Fig. 7). The fastest non-vesicular retrograde transport was found for PE, followed by polyunsaturated PC species and SM, while transport of saturated PC species was comparatively slow.
To determine the structural determinants of lipid species selective non-vesicular transport, we compared the rate constants obtained for six different PC species. Polyunsaturated PC species were transported up to sevenfold (effect sizes up to 8 pooled s.d.) faster through the non-vesicular route than saturated PC species, whereas PC species bearing the bifunctional fatty acid at the sn-2 position were transported up to twofold (3 pooled s.d.) faster than the corresponding regioisomers featuring the bifunctional fatty acid at the sn-1 position (Fig. 2f). These findings imply that while both the unsaturation degree and acyl chain positioning influenced the rates of non-vesicular lipid transport, unsaturation degree appeared to be the primary discriminating structural feature. In contrast to the high selectivity observed during non-vesicular transport, differences between the transport rate constants of the same PC species were smaller in the vesicular endosomal transport pathway and followed no obvious trends (Fig. 2d and Extended Data Fig. 7). Rate constants describing individual steps of vesicular transport in the anterograde direction (from the ER through the Golgi and endosomes to the PM, models 1b–3b) were less well identified (rate constants are shown in Supplementary Tables 1–4). To cross-check the lipid-imaging results, we conducted organelle fractionation experiments at two timepoints using PC(Y/16:0) and PC(Y/20:4) (Fig. 1b) as exemplary lipids with slow and fast retrograde transport kinetics. Consistent with the lipid-imaging results, we found that PC(Y/16:0) was enriched in the PM compared with in the ER–Golgi fraction at both the 4 min timepoint and 30 min timepoint, while PC(Y/20:4) was already equilibrated between PM and ER after 4 min (Supplementary Fig. 7).
To test the predominant role of the non-vesicular route in retrograde transport, we inhibited vesicular trafficking using brefeldin A, which blocks COPI coat formation at Golgi membranes, and wortmannin, which broadly affects endosome formation and trafficking, and quantified the distribution of SM(Y), PE(18:1/Y), PC(Y:16:0) and PC(Y/20:4) between endolysosomes and the ER. Control measurements of transferrin uptake confirmed that endocytosis of protein cargoes was strongly reduced in cells treated with wortmannin or brefeldin A (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 3). We found that lipid transport to the ER was unaffected by blocking vesicular transport for all lipids after 4 min. After 30 min, only SM(Y) accumulated in perinuclear endosomes in wortmannin-treated cells, which is consistent with previous observations that anterograde transport of SM involves vesicular steps32, whereas all other lipids were unaffected.
a, Inhibition of vesicular trafficking between the Golgi and the ER (brefeldin A) and of endosome formation and trafficking (wortmannin). b, Transferrin uptake and localization and lipid localization in control cells and drug-treated cells at 4 min and 30 min after lipid loading. Inhibition of vesicular trafficking does not affect retrograde lipid transport. Scale bar, 10 µm. Transferrin images are shown at identical settings; lipid images were brightness–contrast adjusted to enable comparison of lipid distributions at different timepoints. c, Quantification of the lipid distribution between the ER and endolysosomes after treatment with DMSO (grey), brefeldin A (pink) or wortmannin (light blue). Data are mean ± s.d. Individual n values are provided as source data. Int., internalized. d, Schematic of GLTPD1-mediated lipid transfer and kinetic model used to assess the effects of CPTP KO on non-vesicular transport of SM(Y). e, Comparison of SM(Y) time-course experiments in CPTP-KO and U2OS WT cells. Scale bar, 10 µm. f, Rate constants for retrograde and anterograde PM–ER lipid transport for PC(18:1/Y), PE(18:1/Y) and SM(Y). Kinetics were constructed from six independent timepoints (mean ± s.d.) containing 5 field of views each with 5–10 cells. The mean ± s.d. was calculated from 100 MC model runs. Statistical analysis was performed using pairwise effect-size tests; Cohen’s d values are indicated.
To elucidate the non-vesicular retrograde transport mechanism of SM(Y), we generated a cell line with knockout (KO) of CPTP, which encodes GLTPD1, a cytoplasmic cup-shaped lipid-transfer protein suggested to be specific for SM, with ceramide phosphate as a less preferred cargo33. Quantification of transport between the PM and the ER of PC(18:1/Y), PE(18:1/Y) and SM(Y) revealed that the CPTP KO had the strongest effect on retrograde, non-vesicular transport of SM(Y), which was significantly reduced (0.57-fold of WT, 2.3 pooled s.d.). Smaller changes were observed for PC(18:1/Y) (0.77-fold of WT, 1.6 pooled s.d.) and PE(18:1/Y) (0.96 fold of WT, 0.27 pooled s.d.) (Fig. 3e,f and Supplementary Fig. 5). These results confirm the modelling result that retrograde transport of structural lipids is mostly non-vesicular. Taken together, we find that retrograde non-vesicular lipid transport is both faster and more selective than vesicular transport.
Flippases drive transport selectivity
Next, we assessed the implications of the predominant non-vesicular lipid transport for the steady-state lipid distributions between organelles. The highest fraction of lipid signal in the PM at steady state was found for SM, followed by the saturated PC(Y/16:0) species, whereas polyunsaturated PC and PE localized preferentially to the ER (Fig. 2c and Extended Data Fig. 6c–e (top)). An analysis of quasi-equilibrium constants for lipid exchange between the PM and ER gave a very similar result (Fig. 2e (left)). These findings are consistent with the known lipid concentration gradients between organelles3 and imply directional, non-vesicular lipid transport in cells. How different PC species, SM and PE can be directionally transported through non-vesicular pathways is not well understood. While directional transport of cholesterol, PA and phosphatidylserine (PS) against concentration gradients may be driven by phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate counter-transport8,34, it is unclear which process provides the energy for directional transport of other lipids, in particular through bridge-like lipid transfer proteins35,36.
One attractive mechanism could be the coupling of passive non-vesicular transport to active trans-bilayer flipping of lipids between membrane leaflets catalysed by P4-ATPases, either directly8 or indirectly through the use of the transmembrane lipid concentration gradient by scramblases37,38,39. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the role of lipid flippases in PE transport from the PM to the ER, a lipid that is known to be enriched in the inner leaflet of the PM through flippase activity40 (Fig. 4a). We genetically knocked down (KD) TMEM30A (Extended Data Fig. 8k,l and Supplementary Fig. 4), which encodes the common subunit of PM flippases that move aminophospholipids to the inner PM leaflet41,42 (Fig. 4a) in HCT116 cells. We found that PE(18:1/Y) was transported threefold (11 pooled s.d.) more slowly in TMEM30A-KD cells than in WT cells (Fig. 4c,d,g). TMEM30A-KD cells had a significantly lower kPM–ER/kER–PM ratio (1.6 ± 0.1 versus 2.2 ± 0.1), indicating an altered steady-state distribution, with PE being more strongly enriched in the PM when lipid flipping is perturbed. These results provide direct evidence that ATP-dependent lipid flipping and non-vesicular transport of PE from the PM to the ER are coupled.
a, Schematic of lipid trans-bilayer movement (lipid flipping) and non-vesicular lipid transport by lipid transfer proteins. Pi, inorganic phosphate. b, Kinetic model for the exchange of lipids between the PM and the ER. c, Comparison of time-course experiments for PE(18:1/Y), showing that lipid internalization dynamics are slower in HCT116 TMEM30A-KD cells than in HCT116 wild-type cells. The coloured arrows indicate lipid localization in different membrane types (green, PM; yellow, ER). Scale bar, 10 µm. Images were brightness–contrast adjusted to facilitate comparison of intracellular lipid localizations. d–f, Quantification of PE(18:1/Y) (d), PC(Y/16:0) (e) and PC(Y/20:4) (f) internalization kinetics and model fits. Kinetics were constructed from five independent timepoints. Data are mean ± s.d. Individual n values are provided as source data. g, Rate constants and quasi-equilibrium constants for retrograde and anterograde PM–ER lipid transport for PC(Y/16:0), PC(Y/20:4) and PE(18:1/Y). The mean ± s.d. was calculated from 100 MC model runs. Statistical analysis was performed using pairwise effect-size tests; Cohen’s d values are indicated.
To assess whether the observed effect was specific for PE, we also quantified the transport of two PC species (PC(Y/16:0) and PC(Y/20:4)) in TMEM30A-KD cells. We found that transport of PC(Y/20:4) was slightly faster (1.3 fold, 1.2 pooled s.d.) and transport of PC(Y/16:0) was slightly slower in TMEM30A-KD cells (0.8 fold, 1.7 pooled s.d.) than in wild-type cells (Fig. 4e,f and Supplementary Fig. 6), and that the steady-state distribution of PC(Y/20:4) was shifted towards the PM, whereas the steady-state distribution of PC(Y/16:0) did not change. While these changes indicate a differential role of TMEM30A in the transport of distinct PC species, the overall effect on PC transport was minor compared with the impact on PE(18:1/Y) transport.
Taken together, the combination of genetic perturbations with lipid imaging indicates that active, species-selective flipping of lipids between PM leaflets in conjunction with selective transport by lipid-transfer proteins contributes to the establishment and maintenance of differential organelle membrane compositions despite continuous lipid exchange.
Lipid-transport speed exceeds metabolism
To assess the relative importance of lipid metabolism and lipid-transport processes for the maintenance of organelle lipid compositions, we next compared transport kinetics to lipid conversion kinetics. We monitored turnover of bifunctional lipid probes using ultra-high-resolution FT lipid MS (Extended Data Figs. 8–10 and Supplementary Information (Lipid metabolism)). To obtain a measure of global lipid metabolism, we determined how fast the bifunctional acyl chain of a respective lipid species is redistributed to other lipids by calculating the fraction of the initially supplied bifunctional species with respect to the total abundance of bifunctional lipids (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 8). Moreover, we determined the combined abundance of all bifunctional lipids in the overall lipidome as a measure of probe retention. As expected, both the abundance of the initially supplied species and the total bifunctional lipid content declined over time due to ongoing metabolism, lipid secretion and cell growth. For all bifunctional glycerophospholipid probes, the kinetics of lipid conversion and overall bifunctional lipid depletion were similar, pointing to lipid metabolism as the primary mechanism for falling bifunctional lipid content (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 8). By contrast, bifunctional SM(Y) was quickly depleted from the overall lipidome while constituting over 90% of the bifunctional lipidome at all timepoints (Fig. 5a), which can either be explained by a rate-limiting first step of SM(Y) metabolism or alternative mechanisms of probe depletion, such as secretion.
a, Bifunctional lipid retention and turnover. The fraction of initially supplied species as the percentage of all bifunctional (BF) lipids and the fraction of bifunctional lipids of the total lipidome for PC(18:1/Y), PE(18:1/Y) and SM(Y). b, The fraction of initially supplied lipid probe as the percentage of the bifunctional lipidome as a proxy for the speed of lipid metabolism. The solid lines indicate mono-exponential fits. SM(Y) data were not fitted as very little interconversion was observed; instead, a linear interpolation is shown. For a and b, data are mean ± 95% confidence intervals of three biological repeats containing two technical replicates each. c, Comparison of the determined mono-exponential rate constants for the metabolism of individual lipid species. The error bars show the s.e. of the mono-exponential fit. n.d., not determined. d, Comparison of transport and metabolic rate constants shows that lipid transport is at least one order of magnitude faster. Error bars were obtained by error propagation. e, Lipid transport and metabolism rate constants are highly correlated for PC species despite a clear time-scale separation. The plot shows the kmono-exponential calculated from fitting the data to a single exponential decay versus the mean of kPM–ER from 100 MC runs. The error bars show the s.e. (metabolic rate constants) and s.d. (transport rate constants), calculated from 100 MC model runs. Lin. reg., linear regression.
Among glycerophospholipids, we found that the primary metabolic process for all bifunctional PC species was fatty acid cycling within the cellular PC pool. Moreover, neutral lipids and PE were generated to a certain amount, reaching a combined abundance of 20–40% of the bifunctional lipid pool, whereas incorporation into other glycerophospholipids, such as PS and PI, was negligible (Extended Data Figs. 8–10). PE(18:1/Y) and PA(18:1) probes were converted mainly to PC and neutral lipids (Extended Data Figs. 8–10). Furthermore, we observed that the initially loaded glycerophospholipid species constituted between 10 and 40% of the bifunctional lipidome at later timepoints, indicating that a steady-state distribution resembling the overall glycerophospholipid composition had not been reached after 24 h.
To test whether the observed trends were affected by the chemical modifications of the probes or are generally indicative of the metabolic fate of PM lipids, we compared the metabolism of bifunctional PCs containing oleic and palmitic acid side chains to an isotope-labelled PC(18:1/16:0[13C]) probe, which was delivered to the PM using the same protocol that was used for the bifunctional lipids. The overall metabolism of the isotope-labelled PC closely resembled the palmitate-containing bifunctional probes (Extended Data Fig. 5). We therefore conclude that (1) the observed metabolic trends are due to metabolic bias of PM-resident lipids and (2) that lipids bearing the bifunctional fatty acid are most closely resembling native counterparts bearing a monounsaturated fatty acid in its place.
To compare the kinetics of lipid metabolism and transport, we obtained apparent rates of bulk metabolism by fitting a mono-exponential model. We found an order of magnitude difference between the apparent conversion rate constants of lipid species with values ranging from kmet = 0.001 min–1 to kmet = 0.015 min−1 (Fig. 5b,c). Polyunsaturated PC species were metabolized faster than monounsaturated and saturated PC species; PA and PE were converted faster than the corresponding PC species with the same fatty acid composition, whereas SM was largely stable. By comparing the apparent rate constants of bifunctional lipid probe conversion to the non-vesicular transport rate constants from the PM to the ER, we found that metabolism is slower than transport by a factor of 10–60 for all investigated probes (Fig. 5c,d).
Notably, we found that transport and metabolism rate constants are highly correlated for the PC species despite a pronounced time-scale separation (Fig. 5e). As most PC lipid molecules are metabolically converted after the steady-state distributions are reached, this cannot be explained by delayed access of enzymes to bulk lipids within organelle membranes. The biophysical properties of the respective lipids could be directly responsible, for example, it could be caused by highly correlated activation energies for the transfer of lipids from the bulk membrane into the binding pockets of enzymes and lipid-transfer proteins, respectively. Alternatively, metabolic conversion could be directly coupled to transport, for example, by lipid substrate handover from a lipid-transfer protein to a lipid-metabolizing enzyme.
Taken together, we find that lipid transport is much faster than lipid metabolism. This finding suggests that the differential steady-state distribution of lipid species in the organelles of the secretory pathway mainly results from selective non-vesicular transport rather than local metabolic conversion.
Metabolic channelling of acyl chains
On short time scales, lipid sorting was found to be dominated by non-vesicular lipid transport. To assess whether cases exist in which lipid metabolism controls cellular lipid distribution, we analysed the later timepoints of the time-course experiments. Quantification of lipid-imaging data revealed that bifunctional lipids derived from PC regioisomers bearing the same fatty acids with the bifunctional fatty acid either at the sn-1 or sn-2 position differently accumulated in lipid droplets (Extended Data Figs. 3 and 11a,b). Supplying sn-1-modified PCs resulted in approximately twofold higher accumulation of bifunctional lipids in lipid droplets after 24 h compared to sn-2 modified PCs, suggesting different conversion pathways for the regioisomers (Extended Data Fig. 11b). As the entire lipid droplet intensity distribution was shifted to higher intensities after supplying sn-1-modified PCs, this is highly likely due to differential metabolism at all lipid droplets as opposed to specialized subpopulations (Extended Data Figs. 10 and 11b).
The complementary MS data showed that the production of bifunctional cholesterol ester (CE) was up to sevenfold increased starting from the sn-1-modified PCs compared with the respective sn-2 regioisomers (Extended Data Figs. 10 and 11c). By contrast, conversion into a wide range of triacylglycerols (TAGs) occurred with similar kinetics and abundance for all lipid probes (Extended Data Figs. 10 and 11c), while native TAGs remained unchanged (Extended Data Fig. 5). Together, this suggests that the observed difference in bifunctional lipid accumulation resulted from differential CE formation rates.
The observed TAG patterns suggest a reaction sequence of bifunctional fatty acid cleavage, generation of bifunctional acyl-CoA and subsequent incorporation into TAGs by DGAT2 on lipid droplets (Extended Data Fig. 11f). The alternative route through PA and DAG is incompatible with the obtained data, as supplying PA(18:1/Y) resulted in the rapid formation of a single TAG species, while other species were generated much later (Extended Data Fig. 11d). As canonical CE and TAG biosynthesis routes both involve the same precursor, bifunctional acyl-CoA, the differential PC regioisomer rates can only occur if the bifunctional fatty acid of the sn-1 bifunctional PC isomer is preferentially channelled towards CE, for example, through a spatially coupled enzyme cascade comprising a sn-1-specific phospholipase, an acyl-CoA synthetase and a sterol O-acyl transferase (Extended Data Fig. 11e,f).
Taken together, our data indicate that cellular PC metabolism generates spatially separated pools of identical lipid metabolites for the biosynthesis of TAG and CE, respectively. Thus, our data provide evidence for metabolic bias43 of specific lipid species within the lipid-storage pathway and demonstrate that subcellular accumulation of neutral lipids can be regulated by species-specific metabolism despite slower kinetics than lipid-transport processes.
Discussion
Here we introduce a pipeline to profile the transport and metabolism of individual lipid species in the organelle system of eukaryotic cells with high spatiotemporal resolution. The kinetic comparison of transport and metabolism between different lipid species enabled us to address the fundamental question how cells maintain organelle-specific lipid compositions. We found that small variations in lipid chemical structure strongly influenced the kinetics of non-vesicular lipid transport and metabolism, implying a high degree of selectivity at the level of individual lipid species. This is illustrated by up to sevenfold differences in non-vesicular transport speed between individual PC species that differ in unsaturation degree and acyl chain positioning. Conversely, a similar degree of selectivity was not observed during retrograde vesicular lipid transport of lipids mediated by endocytosis. On the basis of our quantification, we estimate that between 85 and 95% of PM lipids are transported through non-vesicular routes rather than through endocytosis in the retrograde direction (Extended Data Fig. 7), as non-vesicular lipid transport was found to be significantly faster than membrane trafficking.
Together with earlier data indicating that trafficking of the bulk phospholipids PC and PE in the anterograde direction occurs mainly through non-vesicular pathways44,45, our results imply that organelle membrane lipid compositions are maintained mainly through a combination of fast, species-specific, non-vesicular lipid transport. We found that specific non-vesicular lipid transport and ATP-dependent lipid flipping by P4ATPases are coupled, suggesting P4ATPases or lipid asymmetry more generally as a likely source of the energy required for directional lipid transport. This finding provides a possible explanation for the much higher rates of lipid exchange observed between cellular membranes than observed for in vitro membrane models46.
Our lipid-imaging technique relies on photochemical cross-linking for generating covalent lipid–protein conjugates. Lipid–protein interactions typically have lifetimes in the nanosecond–microsecond range40, which implies that, during a 1–10 s photo-crosslinking pulse, lipids switch thousands of times between protein-associated and free states. This fast sampling of membrane proteins by the lipid probe is expected to minimize any potential protein interaction bias in the final cross-linked lipid distributions.
There are two main limitations with our current approach to measuring lipid transport. First, our data indicate that the C16 bifunctional fatty acid used in this study resembles a native monounsaturated fatty acid (C16:1). It is therefore unlikely that fully saturated lipids can be faithfully mimicked using the bifunctional fatty acid that we used in the current study. To an extent, it may be possible to mitigate this by placing the diazirine moiety at either end of fatty acid rather than in the centre of the aliphatic chain47. Second, by delivering probes to the outer PM leaflet, we obtain detailed information on the early steps of retrograde transport, whereas lipid exchange between organelles further removed from the PM in the context cellular lipid transport is captured less well. In the future, this can be addressed by alternative delivery protocols or organelle-specific trifunctional lipid probes, which equip bifunctional lipids with an organelle-directing photocaging group and offer much higher flexibility with regard to intracellular starting points at the cost of lengthier synthetic routes11,13,14.
Taken together, our findings suggest that non-vesicular lipid transport has a key role in the maintenance of organelle identity. Combining our approach with genetic interventions will shed light on the molecular mechanisms that underpin species-selective lipid transport and metabolism. We anticipate that this work will have a major impact for revealing the functions of lipids in cell biology.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The complete lipid flux dataset can be interactively accessed online (https://doi.org/21.11101/0000-0007-FCE5-B), and all original data can be downloaded (https://doi.org/21.11101/0000-0007-FCE4-C and https://doi.org/10.6019/S-BIAD1695). A demo dataset is available online (https://doi.org/10.17617/3.BRSGLA). Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The Python code, the Ilastik models and the MATLAB scripts are provided online (https://doi.org/21.11101/0000-0007-FCE3-D). Custom code was used to perform the image analysis, to calculate the intracellular lipid distribution in the segmented images, to analyse the MS data and to model the transport of lipid in cells.
References
Harayama, T. & Riezman, H. Understanding the diversity of membrane lipid composition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 281–296 (2018).
van Meer, G., Voelker, D. R. & Feigenson, G. W. Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 112–124 (2008).
Kim, Y. & Burd, C. G. Lipid Sorting and organelle identity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 15, a041397 (2023).
Moon, H., Iglesias-Artola, J. M., Hersemann, L. & Nadler, A. Lipid imaging: quantitative imaging of species-specific lipid transport in mammalian cells. https://doi.org/21.11101/0000-0007-FCE5-B (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 2025).
Klose, C., Surma, M. A. & Simons, K. Organellar lipidomics—background and perspectives. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25, 406–413 (2013).
Sampaio, J. L. et al. Membrane lipidome of an epithelial cell line. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1903–1907 (2011).
Holthuis, J. C. M. & Menon, A. K. Lipid landscapes and pipelines in membrane homeostasis. Nature 510, 48–57 (2014).
Reinisch, K. M. & Prinz, W. A. Mechanisms of nonvesicular lipid transport. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202012058 (2021).
Koivusalo, M., Jansen, M., Somerharju, P. & Ikonen, E. Endocytic trafficking of sphingomyelin depends on its acyl chain length. MBoC 18, 5113–5123 (2007).
Haberkant, P. & Holthuis, J. C. M. Fat & fabulous: bifunctional lipids in the spotlight. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1841, 1022–1030 (2014).
Höglinger, D. et al. Trifunctional lipid probes for comprehensive studies of single lipid species in living cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1566–1571 (2017).
Haberkant, P. et al. In vivo profiling and visualization of cellular protein-lipid interactions using bifunctional fatty acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 4033–4038 (2013).
Höglinger, D. in Intracellular Lipid Transport. Methods in Molecular Biology Vol. 1949 (ed. Drin, G.) 95–103 (Humana Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9136-5_8.
Altuzar, J. et al. Lysosome-targeted multifunctional lipid probes reveal the sterol transporter NPC1 as a sphingosine interactor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2213886120 (2023).
Farley, S., Stein, F., Haberkant, P., Tafesse, F. G. & Schultz, C. Trifunctional sphinganine: a new tool to dissect sphingolipid function. ACS Chem. Biol. 19, 336–347 (2024).
Schuhmacher, M. et al. Live-cell lipid biochemistry reveals a role of diacylglycerol side-chain composition for cellular lipid dynamics and protein affinities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7729–7738 (2020).
Höglinger, D., Nadler, A. & Schultz, C. Caged lipids as tools for investigating cellular signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1841, 1085–1096 (2014).
Jiménez-López, C. & Nadler, A. Caged lipid probes for controlling lipid levels on subcellular scales. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 72, 102234 (2023).
Frank, J. A. et al. Photoswitchable diacylglycerols enable optical control of protein kinase C. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 755 (2016).
Morstein, J., Impastato, A. C. & Trauner, D. Photoswitchable lipids. ChemBioChem 22, 73–83 (2021).
Haldar, S. & Chattopadhyay, A. in Fluorescent Methods to Study Biological Membranes (eds Mély, Y. & Duportail, G.) 37–50 (Springer, 2013); https://doi.org/10.1007/4243_2012_43.
Klymchenko, A. S. & Kreder, R. Fluorescent probes for lipid rafts: from model membranes to living cells. Chem. Biol. 21, 97–113 (2014).
Triebl, A. & Wenk, M. R. Analytical considerations of stable isotope labelling in lipidomics. Biomolecules 8, 151 (2018).
Postle, A. D. & Hunt, A. N. Dynamic lipidomics with stable isotope labelling. J. Chromatogr. B 877, 2716–2721 (2009).
Thiele, C. et al. Tracing fatty acid metabolism by click chemistry. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 2004–2011 (2012).
Thiele, C., Wunderling, K. & Leyendecker, P. Multiplexed and single cell tracing of lipid metabolism. Nat. Methods 16, 1123–1130 (2019).
Wunderling, K., Zurkovic, J., Zink, F., Kuerschner, L. & Thiele, C. Triglyceride cycling enables modification of stored fatty acids. Nat. Metab. 5, 699–709 (2023).
Koukalová, A. et al. Lipid driven nanodomains in giant lipid vesicles are fluid and disordered. Sci. Rep. 7, 5460 (2017).
Sarmento, M. J. et al. The impact of the glycan headgroup on the nanoscopic segregation of gangliosides. Biophys. J. 120, 5530–5543 (2021).
Li, G. et al. Efficient replacement of plasma membrane outer leaflet phospholipids and sphingolipids in cells with exogenous lipids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14025–14030 (2016).
Berg, S. et al. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1226–1232 (2019).
Merrill, A. H. Jr Sphingolipid and glycosphingolipid metabolic pathways in the era of sphingolipidomics. Chem. Rev. 111, 6387–6422 (2011).
Titeca, K. et al. A system-wide analysis of lipid transfer proteins delineates lipid mobility in human cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.21.572821 (2023).
Chang, C.-L. & Liou, J. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate homeostasis regulated by Nir2 and Nir3 proteins at endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 14289–14301 (2015).
Lees, J. A. & Reinisch, K. M. Inter-organelle lipid transfer: a channel model for Vps13 and chorein-N motif proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 65, 66–71 (2020).
Hanna, M., Guillén-Samander, A. & Camilli, P. D. RBG motif bridge-like lipid transport proteins: structure, functions, and open questions. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 39, 409–434 (2023).
Guillén-Samander, A. et al. A partnership between the lipid scramblase XK and the lipid transfer protein VPS13A at the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2205425119 (2022).
Matoba, K. et al. Atg9 is a lipid scramblase that mediates autophagosomal membrane expansion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1185–1193 (2020).
Li, Y. E. et al. TMEM41B and VMP1 are scramblases and regulate the distribution of cholesterol and phosphatidylserine. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202103105 (2021).
Lorent, J. H. et al. Plasma membranes are asymmetric in lipid unsaturation, packing and protein shape. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 644–652 (2020).
van der Velden, L. M. et al. Heteromeric interactions required for abundance and subcellular localization of human CDC50 proteins and class 1 P4-ATPases*. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 40088–40096 (2010).
Bryde, S. et al. CDC50 proteins are critical components of the human class-1 P 4-ATPase transport machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 40562–40572 (2010).
Harayama, T. Metabolic bias: Lipid structures as determinants of their metabolic fates. Biochimie 215, 34–41 (2023).
Vance, J. E., Aasman, E. J. & Szarka, R. Brefeldin A does not inhibit the movement of phosphatidylethanolamine from its sites for synthesis to the cell surface. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8241–8247 (1991).
Kaplan, M. R. & Simoni, R. D. Intracellular transport of phosphatidylcholine to the plasma membrane. J. Cell Biol. 101, 441–445 (1985).
Wong, L. H., Čopič, A. & Levine, T. P. Advances on the transfer of lipids by lipid transfer proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci 42, 516–530 (2017).
Farley, S. E. et al. Trifunctional fatty acid derivatives: the impact of diazirine placement. Chem. Commun. 60, 6651–6654 (2024).
Acknowledgements
A.N. acknowledges financial support by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. GA 758334 ASYMMEM and AURORA). A.N., A.H. and A.S. acknowledge financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through the TRR83 consortium. K.B., A.H. and A.N. were supported by the Volkswagen Foundation, project number A133289. This research was supported by an Allen Distinguished Investigator Award and a Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group advised grant of the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation to A.N. and A.H.; M.H. and R.Š. acknowledge the financial support provided by the Advanced Multiscale Materials for Key Enabling Technologies project, supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, project no. CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004558, co-funded by the European Union. M.S. is supported by the ELISIR program of the EPFL School of Life Sciences and acknowledges funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF grant IC00I0-227891). We thank C. Nadler for discussions and providing liposome preparations during the initial lipid-imaging experiments and M. Marass for feedback during manuscript preparation; the staff at the following services and facilities at MPI-CBG Dresden for their support: Protein Expression Facility, Mass Spectrometry Facility, Scientific Computing Facility, Genome Engineering Facility, Organoid and Stem Cell Facility and the Light Microscopy Facility; and J. Peychl, B. Schroth-Diez, S. Bundschuh and H. K. Moon for support and expert advice on fluorescence microscopy and data visualization in the online lipid flux atlas.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Max Planck Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.B., M.S., C.J.L., A.L. and A.N. synthesized lipid probes. A.N. and A.H. developed the initial lipid-delivery and imaging protocol. J.M.I.-A. developed the final, optimized lipid-imaging protocol, optimized colocalization experiments with organelle markers and developed the image analysis pipeline. J.M.I.-A., K.B. and K.C.C. performed lipid-imaging experiments. K.S., V.G. and K.C.C. performed lipidomics experiments. K.S., J.M.I.-A., K.C.C., A.S. and A.N. analysed MS data. J.M.I.-A., K.C.C., K.B., A.N. and A.H. analysed fluorescence microscopy data. R.Š., P.R. and M.H. performed and analysed biophysical characterization of model membrane systems. H.M.L., M.S., K.P.-G. and P.B. contributed to lipid-imaging protocol development. P.B. performed protein purification of the eGFP–LactC2 PS-sensor. P.B. and H.M.L. characterized the HCT116 TMEM30A-KD line and assessed lipid-transport changes. B.D. performed kinetic modelling. A.N. prepared figures with contributions from J.M.I.-A., A.H., B.D., K.C.C., K.B., K.S. and P.B.; A.N. and A.H. wrote the manuscript with contributions from J.M.I.-A., K.B. and M.S.; J.M.I.-A., A.H. and A.N. designed the project. All of the authors read and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.N. and J.M.I.-A. have received a proof-of-concept grant from the ERC to explore the commercial potential of the lipid-imaging methodology. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Anne-Claude Gavin, Stefano Vanni and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Biophysical characterization of bifunctional lipid containing model membranes, lipidome assessment after bifunctional lipid loading and lipid imaging signal comparison for all probes.
a, b. Formation of liquid ordered Lo (stained by Bodipy-FL-GM1; green) and liquid disordered Ld (stained by DiD; red) microdomains is unaffected by replacing 5 % of DOPC content with PC(18:1/Y) in giant unilamellar vesicles GUVs. Scale bars: 40 µm. c. Formation of ganglioside nanodomains leading to faster deexcitation of Bodipy-FL-GM1 donors via FRET is unaffected by replacing 5 % of POPC content with PC(18:1/Y) in GUVs. Scale bar is 40 µm. d. Comparison of lipidome composition directly after lipid loading bifunctional lipid probes (4 min timepoint) with control lipidome. Arrows indicate supplied lipid type. Bars show the mean of 3 biological repeats containing 2 technical replicates each. e. + UV lipid signal vs -UV lipid signal for all probes, 30 min timepoint shown. Note: The high intensity in -UV conditions for PE(18:1/Y) is explained by the fact that PE can be chemically fixed with formaldehyde due to its primary amine group, which is not the case for the other lipids. Scale bar: 10 µm, all images shown at the same magnification.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Optimization of the lipid imaging protocol.
a. Structure of PC(18:1/Y) used for protocol optimization. b. Representative imaging results using optimized lipid loading, crosslinking and click chemistry conditions. Images from experiment and control samples are adjusted to the same intensity. Scale bar: 20 µm, all images shown at the same magnification. c-e. Characterization of UV illumination in the 96-well plate format used for this study. f-h. Optimization of lipid loading and crosslinking conditions. Dashed red lines indicate chosen conditions. Dashed red lines indicate the selected condition for further experiments. Cells were fixed directly after incubation with the loading solution. For f and h samples were incubated with liposomes for 4 min. f-h. Mean and 68% CI of 3 independent experiments. i. Lipid loading does not compromise cell membrane integrity as demonstrated by exclusion of 4 kDa FTIC-Dextran from cell interior. Lipid loading solution was incubated for 10 min before imaging. j-m. Lipid signal visualization using different Picolyl-Azide dyes. AF594-Picolyl-Azide was used for this study. Scale bars: 20 µm.
Extended Data Fig. 3
a-i Lipid transport time courses for all probes and timepoints. Representative images for lipid transport time course experiments. Scale bars: 10 µm, all images shown at the same magnification. Images are brightness-contrast adjusted to facilitate comparing intracellular lipid localization. The full dataset 3D dataset including marker channels can be accessed on https://lipidimaging.org/. N = 3 for each lipid and timepoint.
Extended Data Fig. 4 High time-resolution time courses for PE (18:1/Y) and PA(18:1/Y) and image analysis pipeline.
a, b. Representative images for lipid transport time course experiments at higher time resolution using PA(18:1/Y) (a) and PE(18:1/Y) n = 3 (b). Scale bars: 10 µm. Images are brightness-contrast adjusted to facilitate comparing intracellular lipid localization. n = 3. c, d. Background subtraction strategy. For most data, background was removed using a predicted noise image derived from control images (+ UV, -lipid). In cases where a AF647-Tom20 antibody was used as a mitochondrial stain, we observed a faint mitochondrial signal in the AF594 (lipid) channel in control conditions. For the corresponding +lipid images we estimated the extent of the bleed-through signal by determining the correlation between the mitochondrial signal in the marker channel and the lipid channel, using these parameters to generate an image for the expected artefactual mitochondrial signal in +lipid images & subtracting it from the raw +lipid image. Scale bars: 20 µm. e. Segmentation of marker channels to generate probability masks and representative result of lipid channel background removal. Scale bar: 20 µm. f. Lipid signal assignment to individual organelles shown in e. Scale bar: 20 µm. g. Representative image (PC(Y/18:1), 30 min timepoint) showing lipid signal and individual organelles markers (PM, endosomes, mitochondria) by four-colour fluorescence imaging (left panels). Scale bar: 10 µm. Right panels: Lipid signal assignment for cells shown based on automated image segmentation.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Ultra-high resolution (UHR) shotgun lipidomics of bifunctional lipid probes.
a. Shotgun UHR mass spectrometry resolves lipid peaks spaced by a few mDA and matches bifunctional precursors and their metabolites in multiple lipid classes. Blue line: Section of the spectrum acquired at the conventional (Rs 120,000) resolution on Q Exactive mass spectrometer; orange line: Same spectrum section acquired at Rs ~ 1 M resolution using optional Booster X2 data processing system and extended (2 s) transients. Vertical lines are peak centroids. b. Mol% profile acquired at two time points (see inset for colour coding) of 23 lipid classes (light bars), of which 7 classes comprise lipids with bifunctional lipid moieties (dark bars) produced from PC Y/20:4. c. PC profile covering 22 species with 5 species containing the bifunctional fatty acid. PCs bearing a bifunctional fatty acid (16:1) are annotated as endogenous lipids having the same number of carbons and double bonds in both FA moieties, albeit having different (+28.0061 Da) masses. d. Bifunctional fatty acids from the source PC(Y/20:4) are, incorporated into different lipid classes e.g., the cellular TAG pool consisting of 33 species with 14 species bearing the bifunctional fatty acid. The molar abundance of PC species containing the bifunctional fatty acid other than PC(Y/20:4) (c) and TAG (d) species increases with time, while the abundance of the starting PC(Y/20:4) decreases. Molar% profiles of native lipid classes (b), but also the species profile within PC and TAG classes (c, d) are not perturbed, indicating that the supplemented bifunctional lipids act as true tracer compounds and do not change the overall lipidome compositions. e. Comparison of bifunctional lipid metabolism with the native, isotope labelled, monounsaturated PC species PC(18:1/16:0[13C]). f. Development of the PC species distribution of PC(18:1/16:0[13C]) and palmitate-containing bifunctional PC species shows similar persistence of the original species in the labelled lipidome and similar product species forming. Mean and 95% CI of 3 biological repeats containing 2 technical replicates each are shown for b-f.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Kinetic analysis of lipid imaging and lipid MS data.
a. Data processing steps for quantification results from lipid imaging time course experiments exemplary shown for PC(Y/18:1) (see Supplementary Information for details). b. Transport scheme detailing kinetic models 1b-3b. c. Model 1a-3a fits for PC(16:0/Y), PC(18:1/Y), PC(20:4/Y). d. Model 1a-3a fits for PC(Y/16:0), PC(Y/18:1), PC(Y/20:4). e. Model 1a-3a fits for PE(18:1/Y), SM(Y). Datapoints in were constructed from 5 independent time points (Mean and SD). Individual n-numbers can be found in the source data files.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Results of kinetic analysis and estimation of lipid flow through vesicular and non-vesicular pathways.
a, b. Rate constants for vesicular transport from endosomes to the Golgi and from the Golgi to the ER derived from models 1a-3a. c. Rate constants describing lipid cycling (lipid exchange with the extracellular space, model 2a) and lipid depletion (model 3a). d. Ratio of rate constants describing lipid exchange between the ER and mitochondria (models 1a-3a). Note: Individual rate constants could not be identified from the data, presumably as preceding lipid transport steps were rate-limiting. e-g. Comparison of rate constants describing retrograde vesicular transport from the PM to endosomes and retrograde non-vesicular transport from the PM to the ER for all analysed lipid probes, corresponding models 1a and 1b, 2a and 2b, 3a and 3b shown together. h. Ratio of rate constants describing lipid exchange between the ER and mitochondria (models 1b, 2b, 3b). Note: Individual rate constants could not be identified from the data, presumably as preceding lipid transport steps were rate-limiting. a-h Error bars: mean and SD from 100 MC model runs. i. Fraction of bifunctional lipids transported via the non-vesicular route to the ER and the vesicular route to endosomes during retrograde transport, model 1a rate constants used for simulations. Plots show 100 individual model trajectories as well as the mean and SD of the endpoint distribution from 100 MC model runs. j,k. Effect size comparison for differences between lipid species in retrograde transport from the PM to the ER (kPM_ER) and endosomes (kPM_Endo), respectively, numbers in the heatmaps are Cohen’s d. Cohen’s d values: >0.01 very small (VS), >0.20 small (S), >0.50 medium (M), >0.80 large (L), >1.20 very large (VL), >2.00 Huge (H).
Extended Data Fig. 8 Determination of overall bifunctional lipid content and metabolism of the lipid class level and characterization of TMEM30A KD.
a. Bifunctional lipid incorporation and subsequent depletion over 24 h determined by shotgun lipidomics. Error bars: Mean and 95% CI of 3 biological repeats containing 2 technical replicates each. b-j. Development of bifunctional lipid class distribution over 24 h for all lipid probes. Note that final distributions are not identical, even for closely related species. b-j show the mean and 95% CI n = 3 biological repeats containing 2 technical replicates each. k. Confirmation of TMEM30A KD in HCT116 cells shown by qPCR of GAPDH and TMEM30A in WT and KD cells. l. Quantification cycle (Cq) and Cq normalized to GAPDH (DCq). Mean and SD of 3 biological replicates with 4 technical replicates each.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Analysis of PC species distribution.
a-i. Development of PC species distribution over 24 h for all lipid probes. Note that some species, notably PC(16:1/Y) are only produced from a subset of the initially supplied lipids. For SM(Y), no detectable amount of PC was observed. j. Development of PE species distribution over 24 h after loading PE(18:1/Y). k-m. Development of the regioisomer distribution of the most common PC species PC(16:0,Y) estimated via the MS/MS- fatty acid neutral loss fragments. The bifunctional fatty acid is primarily incorporated at the sn2-position. a-m. Mean and 95% CI, n = 3 biological repeats containing 2 technical replicates each.
Extended Data Fig. 10 Analysis of TAG species distribution and lipid droplet populations.
a-i. Development of TAG species distribution over 24 h for all lipid probes. Note that PA (c) is the only lipid that initially gives rise to a single TAG species, whereas all other probes yield a spectrum of TAGs. Mean and 95% of 3 biological repeats containing 2 technical replicates each. j. Comparison of intensity distribution of individual lipid droplets for PC(18:1/Y) and PC(Y/18:1) and PC(20:4/Y) and PC(Y/20:4). Distribution drawn from 5 fields of view for each lipid.
Extended Data Fig. 11 Dedicated pools of fatty acids are utilized during neutral lipid biogenesis.
a. Lipid droplets (stained with LipidSpot 610, green) exhibit a bright lipid signal (magenta) 4 h after loading PC(Y/16:0), bottom panels which is not observed after loading PC(16:0/Y), top panels. Scale bar: 10 µm. b. Upper panel: Quantification of fluorescence intensity of cellular lipid droplets for all PCs over time. Lower panels: Comparison of intensity distribution of individual lipid droplets for PC(16:0/Y) and PC(Y/16:0), 8 h after loading and statistical analysis of the similarity of the respective distributions for all PC species. Error bars: Mean ± SE of 5 fields of view. c. Mass spectrometric determination of bifunctional lipid content in neutral lipids demonstrates that significantly more TAG than CE is generated after loading PC(16:0/Y) whereas similar amounts of CE and TAG are generated after loading PC(Y/16:0) (left panels). Both species yield complex TAG patterns (right panels) and all TAG species are produced with similar kinetics. Mean and 95% confidence intervals of 3 biological repeats containing 2 technical replicates each. d. A single TAG species is initially produced after supplying PA (18:1/Y), whereas all other species are produced with slower kinetics. Mean and 95% confidence intervals of 3 biological repeats containing 2 technical replicates each. e. Schematic overview of neutral lipid biosynthesis at lipid droplets f. Proposed neutral lipid biosynthetic pathway model featuring dedicated free fatty acid / Acyl-CoA pools.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Text and Data including Supplementary Figs. 1–12, Supplementary Tables 1–16 and Supplementary References – see Contents page for details.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Iglesias-Artola, J.M., Böhlig, K., Schuhmann, K. et al. Quantitative imaging of lipid transport in mammalian cells. Nature 646, 474–482 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09432-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09432-x