Fig. 3: Identification of conserved TFH and TFR signatures.

a–j, Bulk RNA-seq of sorted CD4+CD44+PD-1+CXCR5+FoxP3-RFP−IL-21–GFP+ TFH, CD4+CD44+PD-1+CXCR5+FoxP3-RFP−IL-21–GFP− TFH, CD4+CD44+PD-1+CXCR5+FoxP3-RFP+IL-21–GFP+ TFR, and CD4+CD44+PD-1−CXCR5−FoxP3-RFP−IL-21–GFP− Teff cells from the draining lymph nodes of the mice infected with pathogens described in Fig. 1. MA plot visualizing the log fold change (FC) in the mean expression of genes expressed differentially between the TFH and Teff populations for the five infections (a). UpSet plot showing intersections of genes differentially expressed between the TFH and Teff populations for each infection (b). Common DE genes across three or more infections were used to derive the core TFH signature. False discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. Heatmap of core TFH signature genes (row-based z scores of normalized log2 counts per million) for cytokine and cell surface receptor genes (c) and transcriptional regulator genes (d). GSEA of differentially expressed genes in TFH (TFH versus Teff comparison), TFR (TFR versus Teff), and Teff cells (Teff versus TFH) for all infections (e,f). NES of TFH, non-TFH, GC TFH, GC B, human TFH and cancer-associated TFH cell programs (e) and precursors of exhausted (TPEX), exhausted progenitor (TPROG) and long-term hematopoietic stem cell (HSC-LT) gene programs in the TFH, TFR and Teff populations (f). The NES score represents the enrichment of genes (sets) relative to each comparison, correcting for multiple testing. UpSet plot of the TFR signature showing intersections of upregulated genes expressed differentially between the TFR versus TFH cell contrast population and the TFR versus Teff cell contrast population for five infections (g). FDR < 0.05. Heatmap of TFR signature genes shared across contrasts (TFR versus TFH and TFR versus Teff) (row-based z score of normalized log2 counts per million) for cytokine and cell surface receptor genes (h) and transcriptional regulator genes (i). Bubble plot of Bcl-6 network transcriptional regulator genes in the TFH core showing log2FC differences in the TFH (TFH versus Teff contrast) and TFR (TFR versus Teff contrast) populations (j). The size of the bubble represents the −log10(FDR), and the color indicates the log2FC compared to Teff cells. The colored bar indicates genes present in the TFH core and Bcl-6 gene sets from Extended Data Fig. 5g. Novel genes proposed to be independent of the Bcl-6 network are indicated with gray bars. The data represent independent samples of 2–3 per cell type per infection.