Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Challenges of the inconsistent neurorights framework in Latin America

Nature Neuroscience volume 28, pages 1363–1364 (2025)Cite this article

Subjects

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

The integration of neurotechnology into society has prompted urgent discussions on neurorights (new lists of human rights to regulate neurotechnology) and has led to varied legislative responses across the region that leads this debate: Latin America. Although some countries have responded by pursuing constitutional amendments, others have proposed varied legal reforms, adopted different principles or adopted non-binding soft-law approaches, such as recommendations and guidelines. This diversity of responses has resulted in a fragmented landscape of neurorights protections that poses challenges for regional coherence. This Comment briefly discusses the divergent strategies of Latin American countries for integrating neurorights into their respective legal frameworks, highlighting inconsistencies and proposing ways to navigate these complexities alongside informed scholarship.

Neurorights have emerged as ethical necessities in response to advanced neurotechnology, with varied propositions by leading scholars. Marcello Ienca and Roberto Andorno in 2017 defined four key neurorights: cognitive liberty, mental privacy, mental integrity, and psychological continuity1, each designed to protect individuals from unethical uses of neurotechnology. Concurrently, the Neurorights Foundation led by Rafael Yuste emphasized the importance of creating novel neurorights to mental privacy, personal identity, free will, equitable access to cognitive augmentation, and bias protection (https://neurorightsfoundation.org/mission). These new rights aim to address ethical issues by setting regulatory and protective standards to govern the application of emerging neurotechnologies2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Ienca, M. & Andorno, R. Life Sci. Soc. Pol. 13, 5 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yuste, R. et al. Nature 551, 159–163 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bublitz, J. C. Neuroethics 15, 7 (2022).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Borbón, D. & Borbón, L. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15, 703121 (2021).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fins, J. Neuroethics 26, 8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Díaz-Soto, J. M. & Borbón, D. Front. Psychol. 13, 1030439 (2022).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ligthart, S. et al. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32, 461–481 (2023). 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ligthart, S., Bublitz, C. & Alegre, S. Nature 620, 950 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bublitz, C. Int. J. Hum. Rights 2024, 2310830 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muñoz, J. M. & Borbón, D. Brain Stimul. 16, 1094–1096 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Studies on Genetics and Law, Research Group on Biological Sciences and Law, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia

    Diego Borbón

Authors
  1. Diego Borbón
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Borbón.

Peer review

Peer review information

: Nature Neuroscience thanks Adrian Palacios and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borbón, D. Challenges of the inconsistent neurorights framework in Latin America. Nat Neurosci 28, 1363–1364 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-02001-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-02001-5

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing