Extended Data Fig. 1: The adaptability of bioink formulations.
From: Bioink design for organ-scale projection-based 3D bioprinting
a) Photographs of organ-scale 3D structures printed using SilMA (DS = 30%) as a substitute for GelMA. b) Photographs of organ-scale 3D structures printed using hydrogel precursor solutions within the acceptable DS range (4% GelMA + 5% PEGDA, with GelMA having a DS of 40%; the compressive modulus of bioink is 18.00 kPa). c) Photographs of organ-scale 3D structures printed using a higher concentration (7.5%) of hydrogel precursor solution. d) Photographs of organ-scale 3D structures printed using a higher (10%) concentration of hydrogel precursor solution. e) Compressive properties of bioinks with different concentrations. f) Compressive moduli of bioinks with different concentrations. Data are displayed as mean ± SD, n = 3.
