Abstract
The ocean economic input-output (IO) tables are essential databases for analyzing the ocean economy. However, the IO tables issued by Chinese government’s statistical department adopt the conventional economic sector classifications, which fall short in capturing the heterogeneity of the ocean and land sectors. To fill this gap, we used the stripping coefficient method to construct the ocean economic IO tables of 11 coastal provinces in China, relying on the latest official provincial IO tables in 2017 and ocean economy data published by official institutions. The provincial ocean economic IO tables, which reflect the interconnectedness among 13 ocean sectors and 42 land sectors, could be widely used to support the ocean policy evaluation at the provincial level. To clarify the interlinkage between Chinese ocean economies and foreign economies, we further differentiated the Chinese ocean sectors from a global multi-regional input-output table that contains Chinese provinces. This dataset could be used to evaluate the development of ocean economy in China from a global perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background & Summary
The ocean economy refers to the totality of ocean and ocean-related industrial activities that aim for the development, utilization and protection of the ocean1. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has identified the vast potential of the ocean economy and forecasted that by 2030, the value added and employment created by ocean sectors will surpass the global economy2. Consequently, many coastal countries have prioritized the development of their ocean economies as a fundamental strategy, positioning ocean sectors as the convergence zone for both international competition and cooperation. As highlighted in the 2024 China Marine Economic Statistical Bulletin, China has experienced a rapid growth in the scale of national ocean economy in recent years, with the gross ocean product (GOP) nearly reaching 11 trillion yuan, which represents approximately 8% of gross domestic product (GDP)3. The ocean economy is serving as a new engine for China’s economic development, with a particularly prominent impact on the economic growth of Chinese coastal provinces.
Ocean economic accounting can be characterized by a variety of methods, such as ocean economic input-output (IO) model4,5,6, ocean economic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model7,8, System of National Accounts (SNA)9,10, System of Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA)11,12, Ocean Economy Satellite Accounts (OESA)13,14,15,16,17,18, spatial microsimulation approaches19,20,21, non-market valuation techniques22,23 and other methodologies for specific ocean sectors24. Among these, the ocean economic input-output (OEIO) table can effectively reflect the linkage between ocean and land sectors25,26. The literature has constructed the OEIO tables for several countries such as Ireland26, the United Kingdom27, the United States28, Brazil29, Australia30 and China31,32,33 to evaluate and analyze the economic impacts of their ocean sectors. Yet, there is a notable absence of public IO tables for the ocean economy at the provincial level, which hinders a comprehensive understanding of regional heterogeneity in ocean economy development. To address this gap, this study attempts to develop the provincial OEIO tables.
The stripping coefficient method, characterized by its ability to mitigate potential subjective biases and its strong scalability, is extensively used for compiling IO tables33,34,35,36. The stripping coefficients used in the present study are derived from authoritative economic data and specialized ocean economy statistics within the widely accepted and uniform national economy accounting framework, ensuring a high degree of methodological objectivity37. In addition, the stripping coefficient method allows us to easily extend from constructing provincial OEIO tables to developing global OEIO table, as it supports not only the construction of provincial OEIO tables but also the differentiation of ocean sectors within the global multi-regional input-output (MRIO) table. The constructed OEIO tables not only illustrate the economic value and the interconnections between ocean and land sectors, but also serve as the foundation of various extended IO models to analyze the impact of ocean economic activities on employment, carbon emissions and others38.
Methods
We constructed the OEIO datasets of China’s coastal provinces in 2017, based on the official provincial IO tables published by the National Bureau of Statistics (https://data.stats.gov.cn/)39 and the global MRIO table published by OECD40 that contains Chinese provinces (https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/inter-country-input-output-tables.html). The processes of separating the characteristics of the ocean economy entail seven key steps (Fig. 1): (1) we constructed a bridge matrix linking 13 ocean sectors with 42 sectors listed in the provincial IO tables based on Industrial Classification for Ocean Industries and Their Related Activities (GB/T 20794-2006) and Industrial Classification for National Economic Activities (GB/T 4754-2017). (2) We collected the gross domestic product of ocean economy at the sectoral and provincial level respectively, and adjusted the data to maintain consistency in total values. (3) We estimated the total outputs of ocean sectors in coastal provinces based on the gross domestic product and value-added rates derived from micro-level enterprise data. (4) We estimated the intermediate input matrix of ocean sectors based on the stripping coefficients, which are calculated as the ratio of the output of ocean sectors to the output of corresponding sectors in the official IO tables. (5) We estimated the distribution matrix of ocean sectors in coastal provinces based on the stripping coefficients calculated in the previous step. (6) We adopted the RAS method to balance the constructed provincial OEIO tables. (7) We repeated the above steps to differentiate the Chinese ocean sectors in a global MRIO table that contains Chinese provinces.
Construction of a bridge matrix between ocean sectors and sectors listed in the IO tables
The ocean industry includes 12 major ocean sectors and marine scientific research, education, management and service (O13)1. The 12 major ocean sectors include marine fishery (O1), offshore oil and gas (O2), marine mining (O3), marine salt (O4), marine shipbuilding (O5), marine chemical (O6), marine biomedicine (O7), marine engineering architecture (O8), marine electric power (O9), seawater utilization (O10), marine communications and transport (O11) and coastal tourism (O12). In previous IO tables, ocean sectors were not distinguished from traditional sectors. To address this issue, we first established the correspondence between the traditional sectors in IO tables and 13 ocean sectors, based on the descriptions of ocean sectors outlined in the GB/T 20794-2006 and GB/T 4754-2017 (Supplementary Information 1). Subsequently, we constructed a bridge matrix W that links the 13 ocean sectors to the 42 sectors listed in the official provincial IO tables (Supplementary Information 2). If the ocean sector i belongs to the sector m in provincial IO tables, Wi,m is equal to 1; otherwise, Wi,m is equal to zero. Notably, the bridge matrix W (13 × 42) reveals that an ocean sector can correspond to one or more sectors listed in the official IO Table (1: n), which implies that products produced by a single ocean sector may be categorized into multiple sectors in the official IO tables framework.
Adjustment of gross domestic product of 13 ocean sectors in 11 coastal provinces
China Marine Economic Statistical Yearbook 201841 reported the GOP at the provincial level and the gross domestic product at sectoral level, respectively. For each ocean sector, we allocated the gross domestic product at the sectoral level to the 11 coastal provinces based on the collected provincial ocean economic activity data. For instance, the gross domestic product of marine communications and transport is allocated by the volume of ocean transportation of each coastal province. To ensure the sum of gross domestic product of 13 ocean sectors is equal to the GOP at the provincial level, we further adopted the RAS method42,43,44 to balance the matrix of gross domestic product. Table 1 lists the gross domestic product of 13 ocean sectors in 11 coastal provinces in 2017. Further information on how to determine the gross domestic product of 13 ocean sectors can be found in the Supplementary Information 3–15.
Based on Table 1, we could obtain a 1 × 13 value-added (namely mentioned gross domestic product) vector \({{\bf{v}}}_{r}^{O}\) representing the value added of 13 ocean sectors in coastal province r. The gross value-added vector in coastal province r of provincial IO table is \({{\bf{v}}}_{r}\), whose dimension is 1 × 42. We then defined the value-added stripping coefficient vector in coastal province r as \({{\bf{d}}}_{r}\), which is calculated as the ratio by ocean sectors’ gross value added \({{\bf{v}}}_{r}^{O}\) to the sum of gross value added of all corresponding traditional sectors \({{\bf{v}}}_{r}^{t}={({\bf{W}}{({{\bf{v}}}_{r})}^{{\bf{T}}})}^{{\bf{T}}}\). Then,
where \(\hat{{{\bf{v}}}_{r}^{t}}\) denotes a diagonal matrix of the vector \({{\bf{v}}}_{r}^{t}\), which is determined via the bridge matrix W matching and aggregating the corresponding traditional sectors for each ocean sector. Finally, the land sectors’ value added in coastal province r is defined as \({{\bf{v}}}_{r}^{L}\), which is the remain of 42 traditional sectors’ gross value added that have not been allocated to the ocean sectors.
where s is a 1 × 13 column sum vector with each element equating to 1, employed to sum the columns of the matrix on the right, and where \(\hat{{{\bf{d}}}_{r}}{\bf{W}}\hat{{{\bf{v}}}_{r}}\) is a 13 × 42 matrix with the element representing the value added separated from the one traditional sector to the one ocean sector.
Determination of the total output of 13 ocean sectors in 11 coastal provinces
A sector’s value-added rate is equivalent to the division of its value added by its total output. For this analysis, we first gathered value-added rates of 13 ocean sectors in 11 coastal provinces during 2017 from micro-level enterprise data. Then, the total outputs of ocean sectors can be calculated by the division between the value added (as shown in Table 1) and the corresponding value-added rate. Table 2 lists the total output of 13 ocean sectors in 11 coastal provinces during 2017.
After obtaining the 1 × 13 total output vector \({{\bf{x}}}_{r}^{O}\) of 13 ocean sectors in coastal province r from Table 2, we further estimated the total output of land sectors by the method used in assessing their value added. The sum of total output of all corresponding traditional sectors in coastal province r is \({{\bf{x}}}_{r}^{t}={({\bf{W}}{({{\bf{x}}}_{r})}^{{\bf{T}}})}^{{\bf{T}}}\), where \({{\bf{x}}}_{r}\) is a 1 × 42 vector of 42 traditional sectors’ total output in provincial IO table. Then we constructed the stripping coefficient vector of the total output \({{\bf{c}}}_{r}\), which is a 1 × 13 vector composed of the ratio by ocean sectors’ total output \({{\bf{x}}}_{r}^{O}\) to all corresponding traditional sectors’ total output \({{\bf{x}}}_{r}^{t}\).
By excluding the total output allocated to the ocean sectors from the traditional sectors, we obtained the total output of the land sectors.
The element of the vector \({{\bf{x}}}_{r}^{L}\) means the total output of each land sector.
Estimation of intermediate input matrix of ocean sectors in 11 coastal provinces
Based on the stripping coefficient method, the intermediate input of ocean sectors can be separated from the intermediate input of corresponding sectors in the provincial IO tables by using the stripping coefficient vector \({{\bf{c}}}_{r}\). Following this, the intermediate input matrix of ocean sectors in province r is estimated as \({(\hat{{{\bf{c}}}_{r}}{\bf{W}}{({{\bf{Z}}}_{r})}^{{\bf{T}}})}^{{\bf{T}}}\), where \({{\bf{Z}}}_{r}\) is a 42 × 42 intermediate input matrix of traditional sectors in official provincial IO tables. It should be noted that the intermediate inputs of ocean sectors originate from both ocean and land sectors. For the part of ocean sectors’ input, the intermediate input matrix from ocean sectors to ocean sectors \({{\bf{Z}}}_{r}^{OO}\) is a 13 × 13 matrix that reflects the direct input by ocean sectors themselves, which are separated from the intermediate input matrix from traditional sectors to ocean sectors \({(\hat{{{\bf{c}}}_{r}}{\bf{W}}{({{\bf{Z}}}_{r})}^{{\bf{T}}})}^{{\bf{T}}}\) by using the stripping coefficient method.
Then, for the part of land sectors’ input, the intermediate input matrix from land sectors to ocean sectors \({{\bf{Z}}}_{r}^{LO}\) is a 42 × 13 matrix, which is calculated by
Estimation of the distribution matrix of ocean sectors in 11 coastal provinces
The distribution matrix of ocean sectors in coastal province r indicates the flows of the products produced by these ocean sectors, which could be further divided into intermediate products (\({{\bf{Z}}}_{r}^{OO}\) and \({{\bf{Z}}}_{r}^{OL}\)) and final products \({{\bf{Y}}}_{r}^{O}\). We also used the stripping coefficient vector \({{\bf{c}}}_{r}\) to separate the distribution matrix of ocean sectors from traditional sectors’ distribution matrix.
\({{\bf{Y}}}_{r}\) is a 42 × 7 final use matrix of traditional sectors. The matrix \({{\bf{Z}}}_{r}^{OL}\) means the intermediate products matrix from 13 ocean sectors to 42 land sectors. The matrix \({{\bf{Y}}}_{r}^{O}\) represents the final products from 13 ocean sectors to 7 sub-categories of final use. Then, the distribution matrix from land sectors to land sectors \({{\bf{Z}}}_{r}^{LL}\) is the remain of traditional sectors’ intermediate input matrix, which has not yet been allocated to the intermediate input matrix and distribution matrix of ocean sectors,
and the distribution matrix from land sectors to final use \({{\bf{Y}}}_{r}^{L}\) is
Additionally, the export and import volume of ocean sectors are calculated based on the China customs import and export database (http://stats.customs.gov.cn/).
Balance of the constructed OEIO table
The row balance of an IO table requires that the sum of each row in the intermediate input matrix and the final use matrix must equal the total output of the corresponding sector. Similarly, the column balance stipulates that the sum of each column in the intermediate input matrix and the value-added vector must equal the total input of the corresponding sector. As we differentiated the ocean sectors from the original IO table, the balance of the original IO table was disrupted. To deal with this issue, we adopted the RAS method to adjust the elements of OEIO tables, ensuring that the modified OEIO tables maintain both row and column balances. Figure 2 shows the structure of the constructed provincial OEIO table following the balance adjustment process.
Construction of the global OEIO table
To clarify the economic interactions among provincial ocean sectors with the international economy, we constructed a global OEIO table that captures the ocean sectors of 11 provinces in China through the same stripping coefficient method described above. Specifically, we separated the ocean sectors in a Chinese provincial MRIO table that has been embedded into the global IO table. The global OEIO table will provide insight into the position of provincial ocean sectors in the global value chains. However, the process for constructing this table differs slightly from that used for provincial OEIO table. First, each region in the global MRIO table used in the present study contains 30 sectors, requiring the construction of a new bridge matrix between 13 ocean sectors and 30 sectors listed in the global MRIO table. Second, to construct the distribution matrix of ocean sectors, we need not only the magnitude of gross international trade of ocean sectors in 11 coastal provinces but also the bilateral trade of ocean products between 11 coastal provinces and specific foreign economies. These data are obtained from the China customs import and export database. The structure of the global OEIO table is shown in Fig. 3. The detailed steps for construction of global OEIO table can be found in the Supplementary Information 16.
The structure of global OEIO table. The superscripts C,N,E,O,L represent coastal provinces, inland provinces, other economies, ocean sectors and land sectors, respectively. In China, 11 coastal provinces include 8 provinces (Hebei, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, and Hainan), 2 municipalities (Tianjin and Shanghai), and 1 autonomous region (Guangxi). 20 inland provinces include 14 provinces, 2 municipalities and 4 autonomous in China. Beyond the aforementioned, there are 66 other economies in the global OEIO table.
Data Records
The OEIO datasets contain the following three items.
-
(1)
The 2017 provincial OEIO tables of 11 coastal provinces: the provincial OEIO tables stored as an Excel document show the economic structure of 55 sectors (13 ocean sectors and 42 land sectors) in each coastal province, the layout of which follows a standard IO table with the following three main sections (Fig. 2). The first quadrant at the upper left is the intermediate input matrix (55 × 55), representing the intermediate monetary flows among the 55 sectors in each coastal province. The second quadrant at the upper right is the final use matrix (55 × 7) composed of 4 final use categories, which represents the final use of 55 sectors in each coastal province. In detail, these 4 categories can be subdivided into 7 sub-categories, including final consumption expenditure (rural resident household consumption expenditure, urban resident household consumption expenditure, government consumption expenditure), gross capital formation (gross fixed capital formation and rising inventories), export and domestic out-of-province outflow. The third quadrant at the lower left is the row vector of value added (1 × 55), which represents the value added of 55 sectors in each coastal province. In addition, import, domestic out-of-province inflow and others are demonstrated as the type of 55 × 1 column vector, respectively. The last column vector and row vector represent the total output (55 × 1) and total input (1 × 55), and the total output column vector is equal to the transpose of the total input row vector. To be consistent with the national IO table, all data were calculated at 2017 producers’ prices with a monetary unit of 10 thousand CNY45.
-
(2)
The 2017 global OEIO table that captures ocean sectors of 11 coastal provinces in China: the global OEIO table stored as an Excel document shows the economic structure of 43 sectors (13 ocean sectors and 30 land sectors) in 11 coastal provinces and 30 land sectors in 86 regions. The global OEIO table is organized according to a standard IO table format, which consists of the following three main sections (Fig. 3). The first quadrant at the upper left is the intermediate input matrix (3053 × 3053), representing the intermediate monetary flows among all sectors in 97 regions. The second quadrant at the upper right is the final use matrix (3053 × 388) composed of 4 final use categories, representing the final use of all sectors in 97 regions. The third quadrant at the lower left is the row vector of value added (1 × 3053). Additionally, unlike the provincial IO table, the information on international export and import is presented on the intermediate input matrix and the final use matrix. The last column vector and row vector represent the total output (3053 × 1) and total input (1 × 3053) respectively. All data were calculated at 2017 producers’ prices with monetary values expressed in millions of dollars45.
-
(3)
External data: The macro data mainly comes from statistical departments (National Bureau of Statistics, Bureau of Statistics of Coastal Provinces, Ministry of Natural Resources, General Administration of Customs, Ministry of Commerce), including the value added, value-added rate, related ocean economic activity data, and custom import and export data of 13 ocean sectors. We further provided gross domestic product data for ocean sectors in coastal provinces from 2018 to 2023 (Supplementary Information 17), enabling future studies to analyze the ocean economy in recent years by combining them with the 2017 OEIO tables.
Technical Validation
Due to the lack of publicly available provincial-level OEIO tables in China, it is difficult to directly quantify the differences between the OEIO tables in the present study and those in the literature. Here, we compared the value added of the ocean sectors from published official data and those from the constructed OEIO tables in the present study in Fig. 4. The results show that the value added of the ocean sectors in OEIO tables are approximately equivalent to the published official data (R2 values for all coastal province are greater than 0.98) except for the slight underestimations observed in a few ocean sectors. These results imply that the constructed OEIO tables retain the original data structure while achieving a strong alignment of key ocean economic indicators with publicly released data.
Code availability
There is no custom code used in this paper.
References
National Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China (SAC). GB/T 20794-2006, Industrial Classification for Ocean Industries and Their Related Activities. (2006).
OECD. The Ocean Economy in 2030, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264251724-en (2016).
Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR). 2024 China Marine Economic Statistical Bulletin. https://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202502/t20250224_2881344.html (2024).
Brito, J. A. F., Nguyen, T. V. & Kristófersson, D. M. Evaluating the sustainability and potential of the Blue Economy: A bioeconomic and input–output analysis of the fisheries sector in Cape Verde. Ocean & Coastal Management 250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107042 (2024).
Garza-Gil, M. D., SurĂs-Regueiro, J. C. & Varela-Lafuente, M. M. Using input–output methods to assess the effects of fishing and aquaculture on a regional economy: The case of Galicia, Spain. Marine Policy 85, 48–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.003 (2017).
Li, M. et al. Supply chain effects of China’s fast growing marine economy on greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental Research Letters 16 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abf192 (2021).
Qu, Y. et al. Development of a computable general equilibrium model based on integrated macroeconomic framework for ocean multi-use between offshore wind farms and fishing activities in Scotland. Applied Energy 332 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120529 (2023).
Scandizzo, P. L., Cervigni, R. & Ferrarese, C. A CGE Model for Mauritius Ocean Economy. (Springer, Cham, 2018).
Fenichel, E. P. et al. Modifying national accounts for sustainable ocean development. Nature Sustainability 3, 889–895, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0592-8 (2020).
Tao, W. et al. The framework design and empirical study of China’s marine ecological-economic accounting. Ecological Indicators 132 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108325 (2021).
Wang, T., He, G.-s, Zhou, Q.-l, Gao, J.-z & Deng, L.-j Designing a framework for marine ecosystem assets accounting. Ocean & Coastal Management 163, 92–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.05.019 (2018).
Rahayu, A. K. et al. Optimising Marine Basic Spatial Units (MBSU) for Ocean Accounting using empirical data from Saleh Bay, Indonesia. One Ecosystem 9 https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.9.e125578 (2024).
Loureiro, T. G., Milligan, B., Gacutan, J., Adewumi, I. J. & Findlay, K. Ocean accounts as an approach to foster, monitor, and report progress towards sustainable development in a changing ocean – The Systems and Flows Model. Marine Policy 154 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105668 (2023).
McManus, C., McIlgorm, A., Nichols, R. & Cooper, A. An initial consideration of data availability issues in downscaling ocean accounting to inform sustainable aquaculture development: The example of Clew Bay, Ireland. Marine Policy 145 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105286 (2022).
Frechtling, D. C. The Tourism Satellite Account. Annals of Tourism Research 37, 136–153, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.08.003 (2010).
Jolliffe, J., Jolly, C. & Stevens, B. Blueprint for improved measurement of the international ocean economy: An exploration of satellite accounting for ocean economic activity. Report No. 18151965, (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2021).
Simoes, A. S., Salvador, M. R. & Soares, C. G. Evaluation of the Portuguese ocean economy using the Satellite Account for the Sea. (CRC Press, 2018).
Nicolls, W. Defining and Measuring the U.S. Ocean Economy (2020).
Provost, E. J. et al. Using drones to quantify beach users across a range of environmental conditions. Journal of Coastal Conservation 23, 633–642, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-019-00694-y (2019).
Hynes, S., O’Donoghue, C., Burger, R. & O’Leary, J. Spatial Microsimulation for Regional Analysis of Marine Related Employment. Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics 8 https://doi.org/10.15351/2373-8456.1149 (2022).
Farrell, N., Morrissey, K. & O’Donoghue, C. Creating a Spatial Microsimulation Model of the Irish Local Economy. Vol. 6 105–125 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2012).
Börger, T. et al. The value of blue-space recreation and perceived water quality across Europe: A contingent behaviour study. Science of The Total Environment 771 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145597 (2021).
Kubo, T. et al. Mobile phone network data reveal nationwide economic value of coastal tourism under climate change. Tourism Management 77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104010 (2020).
Hynes, S., Cawley, M., Deely, J. & Norton, D. Alternative approaches to measuring the value of tourism in marine and coastal areas in ocean economy accounting. Marine Policy 168 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106299 (2024).
Wang, Y. & Wang, N. Exploring the role of the fisheries sector in China’s national economy: An input–output analysis. Fisheries Research 243 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106055 (2021).
Morrissey, K. & O’Donoghue, C. The role of the marine sector in the Irish national economy: An input–output analysis. Marine Policy 37, 230–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.004 (2013).
Stebbings, E., Papathanasopoulou, E., Hooper, T., Austen, M. C. & Yan, X. The marine economy of the United Kingdom. Marine Policy 116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103905 (2020).
Holdowsky, G. P. M. W. R. A. M. Contribution of the Ocean Sector to the United States Economy. Science 208, 1000–1006, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.208.4447.1000 (1980).
Carvalho, A. B. & Inácio de Moraes, G. The Brazilian coastal and marine economies: Quantifying and measuring marine economic flow by input-output matrix analysis. Ocean & Coastal Management 213 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105885 (2021).
van Putten, I., Cvitanovic, C. & Fulton, E. A. A changing marine sector in Australian coastal communities: An analysis of inter and intra sectoral industry connections and employment. Ocean & Coastal Management 131, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.07.010 (2016).
Wang, Y. & Wang, N. The role of the marine industry in China’s national economy: An input–output analysis. Marine Policy 99, 42–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.019 (2019).
Zheng, L. & Tian, K. The contribution of ocean trade to national economic growth: A non-competitive input-output analysis in China. Marine Policy 130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104559 (2021).
Zheng, L., Zou, H., Duan, X., Lin, Z. & Du, H. Potential determinants affecting the growth of China’s ocean economy: An input-output structural decomposition analysis. Marine Policy 150 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105520 (2023).
Hong, Q., Lu, Y., Gu, Y. & Xu, A. Input-Output Table Compilation and Industrial Linkage Relationship in China’s Maritime Economy. Journal of Statistics 4 https://doi.org/10.19820/j.cnki.ISSN2096-7411.2023.06.005 (2023).
Xiang, S., Tian, R. & Kong, X. Compilation of Marine Input-Output Table and Research on Industrial Dependence in Zhejiang Province. Ocean Development and Management 39 https://doi.org/10.20016/j.cnki.hykfygl.20220623.001 (2022).
Wang, L. & Xiao, W. Industry Linkage of Marine Industry and Marine-Land Industry Linkage Development—Based on Input-Output Model. Economic Geography 36 https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2016.01.016 (2016).
He, G., Wang, X., Zhou, H., Guo, Y. & Xu, C. Study on the Accounting Methodology of Gross Production of Ocean. Marine Science Bulletin, 64-71 https://doi.org/10.11840/j.issn.1001-6392(2006)03-0064-08 (2006).
Roca Florido, A. & Mair, S. Tensions between the carbon, employment and value added generated by marine sectors: Triple bottom line analysis using a novel input–output table for the UK. Sustainable Development https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3188 (2024).
Department of National Accounts (DNA). Regional Input-output Tables of China 2017 (China Statistics Press, 2020).
OECD. OECD Inter-Country Input-Output Database. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/inter-country-input-output-tables.html (2023).
Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR). China Marine Economic Statistical Yearbook 2018 (China Ocean Press, 2019).
Dewhurst, J. H. L. Using the RAS Technique as a Test of Hybrid Methods of Regional Input–Output Table Updating. Regional Studies 26, 81–91, https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409212331346791 (2006).
Liu, Y. et al. A study of CO2 emissions in China’s domestic construction industry based on non-competitive input-output. Sustainable Production and Consumption 32, 743–754, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.024 (2022).
Toh, M.-H. The RAS Approach in Updating Input Output Matrices: An Instrumental Variable Interpretation and Analysis of Structural Change. Economic Systems Research 10, 63–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319800000006 (1998).
Liang, X. et al. Ocean economic input-output tables of coastal provinces in China. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27959550 (2025).
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72474188, 72394404) and a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project Reference Number: AoE/P-601/23-N).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.Z., K.Z. and L.Z. designed the study. Z.Z. led the project. X.L. and C.Z. compiled the OEIO tables. X.L. and C.Z. wrote the manuscript and all authors (X.L., C.Z., L.Z., K.Z. and Z.Z.) contributed to this manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, X., Zheng, C., Zheng, L. et al. Ocean economic input-output tables of coastal provinces in China. Sci Data 12, 876 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05221-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05221-3