Table 4 Comparison between the site scattering (s.s.) of extra-framework (EF) cation sites calculated from SEM-EDS chemical data (s.s. from partition) and Rietveld refinement (s.s. from Rietveld refinement).

From: The mechanism of iron binding processes in erionite fibres

Site

KCl exchanged

Fe-exchanged

EF cation

s.s from partition (e)

s.s. from Rietveld refinement (e)

EF cation

s.s from partition (e)

s.s. from Rietveld refinement (e)

Ca1

   

Mg0.6

7.2

4.1 (7)

Ca2

Na1.5K0.6

27.9

26.1 (8)

Na0.6(1.5)

6.6 (16.5)

24.3 (6)

Ca3

Mg0.3

3.6

5.3 (5)

Fe0.8

20.8

20.2 (9)

K1

K2

38

38

K2

38

38

K2

K1.3

24.7

24.7 (7)

K1.1

20.9

23.1 (6)

OW7–12

K2

38

37

K1.1

20.9

23

 

total

132.2

131 (2)

total

124.3 (134.2)

133 (3)

  1. In italics, in parenthesis, the same calculation for an estimated content of Na equal to that of the KCl treated sample, due to the very small release of Na detected by ICP-OES. The low Na content observed by SEM-EDS is due to the renewed Na (and possibly K) cation mobility under the electron beam arising from the leaching of the K cations located at the OW sites.