Abstract
In this paper, we investigate second harmonic generation in a single hexagonal GaAs nanowire. An excellent frequency converter based on this nanowire excited using a femtosecond laser is demonstrated to operate over a range from 730 nm to 1960 nm, which is wider than previously reported ranges for nanowires in the literature. The converter always operates with a high conversion efficiency of ~10−5 W−1 which is ~103 times higher than that obtained from the surface of bulk GaAs. This nanoscale nolinear optical converter that simultaneously owns high efficiency and broad bandwidth may open a new way for application in imaging, bio-sensing and on-chip all-optical signal processing operations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Second harmonic generation (SHG) is a second-order nonlinear optical process in which an optical wave with frequency ω is converted into a second wave at a doubled frequency of 2ω. SHG is well known to be a forbidden process in materials that have a center of inversion symmetry, but it can occur in noncentrosymmetric materials or at the surface of a material with any symmetry group1. As the first nonlinear optical effect to be found after the invention of the laser, SHG was first demonstrated in crystalline quartz by Franken et al. in 19612. Since then, SHG has been a subject of intense theoretical and experimental study in many optical materials, including potassium dihydrogen phosphate crystals3, nematic liquid crystals4, GaP photonic crystal waveguides5, magnetic metamaterials6, 7, left-handed metamaterials8, AlGaAs microdisks9, quantum dots10, and biological tissues11.
Recently, SHG in nanowires (NWs), which are one-dimensional nanostructures with a thickness or diameter of tens of nanometres or less and unconstrained length, has attracted increasing attention because it has potential for use in a wide variety of applications, including generation of nanoscale coherent light sources12, optical correlator13, integrated nanophotonic components14, highly localised excitation15, crystal structure identification16, 17, and nonlinear optical microscopy18,19,20. As previously reported in the literature, NWs composed of several different materials, including alkaline niobates21, ZnO22,23,24, ZnTe20, ZnSe25, ZnS16, CdS13, 26, GaAs17, 19, 27, GaN18, GaP28, 29, InP30, perovskite Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 31, graphene32 and Pt33, can be excited to generate second harmonic light. Among these materials, GaAs NWs are excellent candidate materials for SHG because of the high second-order nonlinear optical susceptibility of GaAs.
In 2013 He et al. demonstrated that a vertical free-standing GaAs-NW array could generate broadband SHG signals when excited using femtosecond (fs) lasers and briefly mentioned that an isolated single NW is also capable of producing broadband SHG signals34. However, the conversion efficiency of the broadband SHG signals that were generated, which is very important for SHG in practice24, 26 was not given. In this work, we systematically investigated SHG using a single hexagonal GaAs NW. We found that a single GaAs NW can be excited using a fs laser to generate second harmonic light over a broad wavelength range from 730 to 1960 nm, which is wider than the ranges reported for NWs in the literature such as that of ref. 34. Additionally, the conversion efficiency of the generated broadband SHG signals is insensitive to the excitation wavelength and can reach the order of ~10−5 W−1, which is three orders of magnitude higher than that which occurs at the surface of bulk GaAs.
Results and Discussion
We present SHG from a single hexagonal GaAs NW that was measured using a homemade confocal microscope system. The experimental setup is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1(a). Here the fs laser, i.e. the fundamental wave (FW) laser, is generated using a mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser (MaiTai HP, Spectra Physics) with a pulse width of <100 fs, a tuning range of 690 to 1040 nm, and a repetition rate of 80 MHz. The experimental setup that was used to measure SHG from single GaAs NWs is described in greater detail in the Methods section.
(a) Schematic diagram showing the experimental setup used to measure SHG from a single GaAs NW. M: mirror; WP1, WP2: half-wave plates; LP1, LP2, FP: polarizers; BS1, BS2, BS3: beam splitters; L1, L2: lenses; SF: short-pass filter. (b) CCD image of a GaAs NW with the pump laser spot focused on it. (c) SEM image of single GaAs NW on a SiO2 substrate, where the NW has a diameter of approximately 500 nm and length of approximately 5.55 μm. The inset shows the hexagonal NW cross-section.
The GaAs NW with \(\bar{4}3m\) space group that was studied was synthesized on GaAs (100) substrates using the Veeco Mod Gen-II molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) system, with the vapour-liquid-solid (VLS) mechanism (further details of this process can be found in the Methods section). The NW was then dry-transferred to a Si/SiO2 substrate with a patterned gold grid that was used for spatial separation and identification. The SHG signal that was excited from the NW was subsequently imported into a charge-coupled device (CCD) or spectrometer. The occurrence of coupling effects between different GaAs NWs is excluded because of the focused laser spot size of ~1.5 μm (Fig. 1(b)). Figure 1(c) shows a typical scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a single GaAs NW with a diameter of approximately 500 nm and a length of approximately 5.55 μm. The inset in Fig. 1(c) shows that the NW has a hexagonal cross-section as previously reported35.
Micro-photoluminescence spectra were measured from an individual NW at room temperature under 80 MHz pulsed excitation. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the prominent peak at 417 nm, which represents the exactly frequency-doubling signal from the FW laser (834 nm), indicates that the signal is generated through a second-order nonlinear process. Additionally, no peaks were observed from defect-related photoluminescence emissions or two-photon excited fluorescence, which indicates the high crystalline quality of the GaAs NWs used16. The inset of Fig. 2(a) shows the signal intensity as a function of the power of the FW laser, where the quadratic dependency confirms that the signal can be ascribed to the SHG process in the single GaAs NW.
(a) Spectra of the excited SHG and the FW laser at a FW laser power of 87.12 μW. The inset shows that the SHG signal has a square power dependence on the FW laser. (b) Polarimetric plot of the total SHG signal under parallel polarized excitation (TM). (c) Total SHG signal as a function of the FW polarization angle.
The polarization of the SHG signals was also studied. Figure 2(b) shows the measured SHG intensity as a function of signal polarization angle φ under a parallel polarized FW laser (transverse magnetic, TM) input. Here the polarization angle φ is defined as the angle of the electric field (E-field) direction of the SHG with respect to the long axis of the NW. The SHG intensity follows a cos2 φ shape where the peak is always polarized along the long axis of the NW. More detailed theoretical calculations are provided in the Supplementary Information section. The intensity characteristic thus allows the NW’s long axis to be identified, and we also investigated the SHG intensity as a function of the FW laser polarization angle θ, with results as shown in Fig. 2(c). In this case, the polarization angle θ is defined as the angle of the E-filed direction of the FW laser with respect to the long axis of the NW. The polarization direction is along the long axis of the NW (i.e., where θ = 0), which indicates that the anisotropy of the SHG can be attributed to the intrinsic permutation symmetry of the GaAs crystal lattice.
To illustrate the origin of the SHG in the nanowires, we then studied the SHG signals at different wavelengths under TM excitation. As shown in Fig. 3(a), SHG in the single GaAs NW was detected at a series of discrete FW wavelengths over the range from 760 to 1000 nm at a constant FW power of 4.07 mW. The longest and shortest wavelengths obtained were 500 nm and 365 nm, which were excited by 1000 nm and 730 nm fs laser inputs, respectively. The results indicate that the single GaAs NW can be excited to generate second harmonic light by the fs laser over a broad wavelength range. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the SHG signal has a quadratic power dependence on the FW laser over the FW wavelength range, which indicates that this is a second-order nonlinear process. Most importantly, this broadband SHG process demonstrates wavelength insensitivity, which can be attributed to surface SHG that is generated within a nanoscale region without signal propagation and therefore does not require phase matching (PM) conditions20.
To confirm these results, we also investigated the conversion efficiency η 2ω of the SHG signal, which is defined in this work as \({\eta }_{2\omega }={P}_{2\omega }/{P}_{\omega }^{2}\), where P 2ω and P ω are the SHG signal and FW laser powers, respectively. The method used to measure the conversion efficiency can be found in the Methods section. It was previously established that broadband SHG often comes at the cost of reduced conversion efficiency36. High-efficiency SHG depends critically on the PM conditions. However, the PM requirement limits significantly the bandwidth of the SHG processes37. Thus, the high-efficiency broadband SHG has never been really obtained to the best of our knowledge. Herein we demonstrated that the broadband SHG observed in the single hexagonal GaAs NW was simply a high-efficiency SHG process. We found that the SHG conversion efficiency of the single GaAs NW maintained a high value over a wide FW wavelength range. Figure 4 shows typical experimental results, where the SHG conversion efficiency of the single GaAs NW is three orders of magnitude higher than that at the surface of bulk GaAs over the wavelength range from 730 nm to 1000 nm, and can reach the order of ~10−5 W−1. The high SHG conversion efficiency of the single GaAs NW probably stems from its high surface-to-volume ratio. This ratio breaks the crystal symmetry and induces the dipoles to oscillate with the E-field of the FW laser. The second-order nonlinearity coefficient of the NW is therefore enhanced. Additionally, the NW structure offers confinement and surface enhancement effects to the laser E-field. The frequency conversion in the single GaAs NW is therefore more efficient than that which occurs at the surface of bulk GaAs34.
As an additional trial, a fs-scale optical parametric amplifier (OPerA Solo, Coherent) with a pulse width of <100 fs, a tuning range of 190 to 20000 nm, and a repetition rate of 1 kHz was used to excite the single hexagonal GaAs NW. The experimental setup was almost the same as that shown in Fig. 1(a). The main difference was that the intensity of the FW laser was adjusted not by the half-wave plate (WP1) and the linear polarizer (LP1) but by a neutral density filter because of a lack of available half-wave plates and linear polarizers that operate in this wavelength range. The half-wave plate (WP2), linear polarizer (LP2), and film polarizer (FP) were removed from the optical path because we do not measure a polarimetric plot of the SHG signal in this wavelength range. The short-pass filter (SF) was replaced with a model 84–655 filter from Edmund Optics to filter out the FW laser light in this wavelength range. The CCD camera used to observe the NW was replaced with a Micronviewer from Electrophysics. The spectrometer was also replaced with a model USB2000+ from Ocean Optics to measure the micro-photoluminescence spectra from the NW. Because of the restrictions of these devices, the longest SHG wavelength that was obtained was 980 nm, which was excited by a 1960 nm FW laser input, as shown in Fig. 5(a). Figure 5(b) shows that the SHG signal has a square power dependence on the FW laser input, which indicates that the SHG is indeed a second-order nonlinear process.
In summary, we have investigated SHG in a single hexagonal GaAs NW in detail. We found that excitation of this NW can generate second harmonic light that has not been simultaneously accompanied by defect-related photoluminescence emission or two-photon excited fluorescence to date. Additionally, the generated SHG is highly coherent and has very good polarization properties. We observed SHG over a broad wavelength range from 700 nm to 1960 nm, which is the widest wavelength range to be demonstrated in NWs to the best of our knowledge. The SHG conversion efficiency is also very high and can reach the order of ~10−5 W−1, which is ~103 times higher than that obtained from the surface of bulk GaAs. This high-efficiency broadband SHG procedure based on a single NW may find applications in imaging, bio-sensing and on-chip all-optical signal and processing.
Methods
Optical measurements
We performed a series of experiments to measure SHG in a single GaAs NW using a homemade confocal microscope system. The experimental setup is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1(a). The fs laser is generated using a mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser (MaiTai HP, Spectra Physics) with a pulse width of <100 fs, a tuning range of 690 to 1040 nm, and a repetition rate of 80 MHz. The FW laser intensity was adjusted by rotating the half-wave plate (WP1, AHWP10M-980, Thorlabs) while the linear polarizer (LP1, LPVIS100-MP2, Thorlabs) remained fixed, and the laser polarization was controlled by rotating a second half-wave plate (WP2). The linear polarizer (LP2) that was placed in front of the half-wave plate is used to refine the polarization. The FW laser was focused on individually selected NWs using a microscope objective (50X, numerical aperture of 0.8, Olympus). The excited signal that was emitted by the NW was collected using the same objective and was reflected using a beam splitter (BS3) through a 150 mm-focal-length lens (L2) to a spectrometer/monochromator (Acton SP2750, Princeton) that was equipped with a liquid-nitrogen-cooled CCD (Spec-10:100BR, Princeton). A short-pass filter (SF, FF01, Semrock, S810, Asahi Spectra, or FESH0900, Thorlabs) was placed in front of the spectrometer to filter out the FW laser light. The polarimetric plot of the total SHG signal under parallel polarized excitation (TM) was measured by simply rotating the film polarizer (FP, LPVISE100-A, Thorlabs). The CCD camera (Infinity3, Lumenera) was used to acquire images of the sample via the lens (L1) under white light illumination, to enure that the FW laser was normally incident on the NW.
Nanowire growth
The GaAs NWs under study were synthesized on GaAs (100) substrates using the Veeco Mod Gen-II MBE system and the VLS mechanism. The substrates were first coated by sputtering of a 15-nm-thick silicon dioxide layer and were then dipped for 2 s in a 10% HF aqueous solution. Prior to growth, the substrates were degassed at 700 °C for 10 min and growth was then initiated using 1 nm Ga droplets as a catalyst at 620 °C in the absence of arsenic overpressure. The GaAs core was grown at 620 °C for 30 min at an As2/Ga flux ratio of 12.5; a 10 min interruption was then introduced under a high arsenic atmosphere to crystallize the gallium droplets on the tip and induce lateral growth of the nanowire. The deposition rate (equivalent to the planar growth rate on a GaAs (100) substrate) of these GaAs NWs was set at 0.7 μm/h.
SHG signal conversion efficiency
To obtain accurate measurements of the SHG conversion efficiency η 2ω , we first detected the power P ω of the FW laser using a power meter. Second, we recorded number of photons N of the SHG signal using the spectrometer and calculated the power P 2ω of the SHG signal using the formula \({P}_{2\omega }=(Nhc/\lambda )/t\), where h is Planck’s constant, c is the speed of light and λ is the wavelength of the SHG signal. We then calculated the SHG conversion efficiency η 2ω , based on the definition \({\eta }_{2\omega }={P}_{2\omega }/{P}_{\omega }^{2}\) for the SHG conversion efficiency26.
References
Boyd, R. W. Nonliear Optics. (Academic Press, Singapoer, 2010).
Franken, P. A., Hill, A. E., Peters, C. W. & Weinreich, G. Generation of optical harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 118–119, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.118 (1961).
Aoyama, M., Harimoto, T., Ma, J., Akahane, Y. & Yamakawa, K. Second - harmonic generation of ultra-high intensity femtosecond pulses with a KDP crystal. Opt. Express 9, 579–585, doi:10.1364/OE.9.000579 (2001).
Hong, S. H. et al. Second-harmonic generation in a bent-core nematic liquid crystal. Phys. Rev. E 82, 041710, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.82.041710 (2010).
Rivoire, K., Buckley, S., Hatami, F. & Vućovicé, J. Second harmonic generation in GaP photonic crystal waveguides. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 263113, doi:10.1063/1.3607288 (2011).
Klein, M. W., Enkrich, C., Wegener, M. & Linden, S. Second-Harmonic Generation from Magnetic Metamaterials. Science 313, 502–504, doi:10.1126/science.1129198 (2006).
Klein, M. W., Wegener, M., Feth, N. & Linden, S. Experiments on second- and third-harmonic generation from magnetic metamaterials. Opt. Express 15, 5238–5247, doi:10.1364/OE.15.005238 (2007).
Shadrivov, I. V., Zharov, A. A. & Kivshar, Y. S. Second-harmonic generation in nonlinear left-handed metamaterials. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23, 529–534, doi:10.1364/JOSAB.23.000529 (2006).
Mariani, S. et al. Second-harmonic generation in AlGaAs microdisks in the telecom range. Opt. Lett. 39, 3062–3065, doi:10.1364/OL.39.003062 (2014).
Zielinski, M., Oron, D., Chauvat, D. & Zyss, J. Second-Harmonic Generation from a Single Core/Shell Quantum Dot. small 5, 2835–2840, doi:10.1002/smll.v5:24 (2009).
Deng, X., Williams, E. D., Thompson, E. W., Gan, X. & Gu, M. Second-harmonic generation from biological tissues: Effect of excitation wavelength. Scanning 24, 175–178, doi:10.1002/sca.4950240403 (2002).
Nakayama, Y. et al. Tunable nanowire nonlinear optical probe. Nature 447, 1098–1101, doi:10.1038/nature05921 (2007).
Yu, H. et al. Single Nanowire Optical Correlator. Nano Lett. 14, 3487–3490, doi:10.1021/nl5010477 (2014).
Yan, R., Gargas, D. & Yang, P. nanowire photonics. Nat. Photonics 3, 569–576, doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.184 (2009).
Sergeyev, A. et al. Second-harmonic generation in lithium niobate nanowires for local fluorescence excitation. Opt. Express 21, 19012–19021, doi:10.1364/OE.21.019012 (2013).
Hu, H. et al. Precise Determination of the Crystallographic Orientations in Single ZnS Nanowires by Second-Harmonic Generation Microscopy. Nano Lett. 15, 3351–3357, doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00607 (2015).
Ren, M., Agarwal, R., Liu, W. & Agarwal, R. Crystallographic Characterization of II-VI Semiconducting Nanostructures via Optical Second Harmonic Generation. Nano Lett. 15, 7341–7346, doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02690 (2015).
Long, J. P., Simpkins, B. S., Rowenhorst, D. J. & Pehrsson, P. E. Far-field Imaging of Optical Second-Harmonic Generation in Single GaN Nanowires. Nano Lett. 7, 831–836, doi:10.1021/nl0624420 (2007).
Grange, R. et al. Far-Field Imaging for Direct Visualization of Light Interferences in GaAs Nanowires. Nano Lett. 12, 5412–5417, doi:10.1021/nl302896n (2012).
Liu, W., Wang, K., Liu, Z., Shen, G. & Lu, P. Laterally Emitted Surface Second Harmonic Generation in a Single ZnTe Nanowire. Nano Lett. 13, 4224–4229, doi:10.1021/nl401921s (2013).
Dutto, F., Raillon, C., Schenk, K. & Radenovic, A. Nonlinear Optical Response in Single Alkaline Niobate Nanowires. Nano Lett. 11, 2517–2521, doi:10.1021/nl201085b (2011).
Johnson, J. C. et al. Near-Field Imaging of Nonlinear Optical Mixing in Single Zinc Oxide Nanowires. Nano Lett. 2, 279–283, doi:10.1021/nl015686n (2002).
Prasanth, R., van Vugt, L. K., Vanmaekelbergh, D. A. M. & Gerritsen, H. C. Gerritsen Resonance enhancement of optical second harmonic generation in a ZnO nanowire. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 181501, doi:10.1063/1.2200230 (2006).
Grinblat, G. et al. High-Efficiency Second Harmonic Generation from a Single Hybrid ZnO Nanowire/Au Plasmonic Nano-Oligomer. Nano Lett. 14, 6660–6665, doi:10.1021/nl503332f (2014).
Barzda, V. et al. Giant anisotropy of second harmonic generation for a single ZnSe nanowire. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 113111, doi:10.1063/1.2901023 (2008).
Ren, M. L., Liu, W. J., Aspetti, C. O., Sun, L. X. & Agarwal, R. Enhanced second-harmonic generation from metal-integrated semiconductor nanowires via highly confined whispering gallery modes. Nat. Commun. 5, 5432, doi:10.1038/ncomms6432 (2014).
Bautista, G. et al. Second-Harmonic Generation Imaging of Semiconductor Nanowires with Focused Vector Beams. Nano Lett. 15, 1564–1569, doi:10.1021/nl503984b (2015).
Sanatinia, R., Swillo, M. & Anand, S. Surface Second-Harmonic Generation from Vertical GaP Nanopillars. Nano Lett. 12, 820–826, doi:10.1021/nl203866y (2012).
Sanatinia, R., Anand, S. & Swillo, M. Modal Engineering of Second-Harmonic Generation in Single GaP Nanopillars. Nano Lett. 14, 5376–5381, doi:10.1021/nl502521y (2014).
Wang, F. et al. Nonlinear Optical Processes in Optically Trapped InP Nanowires. Nano Lett. 11, 4149–4153, doi:10.1021/nl2020262 (2011).
Zhou, H., Wang, X., Zhuang, X. & Pan, A. Second harmonic generation and waveguide properties in perovskite Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 nanowires. Opt. Lett. 41, 3803–3805, doi:10.1364/OL.41.003803 (2016).
Gao, Y. & Shadrivov, I. V. Second harmonic generation in graphene-coated nanowire. Opt. Lett. 41, 3623–3626, doi:10.1364/OL.41.003623 (2016).
Hayashi, N. et al. Optical second harmonic generation from Pt nanowires. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 8933–8938, doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.05.007 (2007).
He, H. et al. Broadband second harmonic generation in GaAs nanowires by femtosecond laser sources. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 143110, doi:10.1063/1.4824024 (2013).
Yu, Y. et al. Self-Assembled Quantum Dot Structures in a Hexagonal Nanowire for Quantum Photonics. Adv. Mater. 26, 2710–2717, doi:10.1002/adma.201304501 (2014).
Sheng, Y., Dou, J., Ma, B., Cheng, B. & Zhang, D. Broadband efficient second harmonic generation in media with a short-range order. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 011101, doi:10.1063/1.2754365 (2007).
Fischer, R., Saltiel, S. M., Neshev, D. N., Krolikowski, W. & Kivshar, Y. S. Broadband femtosecond frequency doubling in random media. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 191105, doi:10.1063/1.2374678 (2006).
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2010CB923200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U0934002 and 61323001), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2015M572395) and the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. V200801).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.W., Y.Y., and X.H.W. conceived the idea and the strategies for the theoretical analysis and the experimental design. J.T.L., Z.K.Z., Z.C.N., and S.Y.Y. helped to develop the experimental strategy. Y.Y. synthesized and transferred the samples, and was assisted by S.F.L. J.W. designed the experiments and performed the measurements, and was assisted by Y.M.W., J.W., Y.Y., and X.H.W. analysed the data and co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Yu, Y., Wei, YM. et al. High-efficiency broadband second harmonic generation in single hexagonal GaAs nanowire. Sci Rep 7, 2166 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02199-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02199-w