Table 2 Uni and multivariate results of the single versus biplane comparison.
From: Safety and Effectiveness of Neuro-thrombectomy on Single compared to Biplane Angiography Systems
Angioroom Type | Single-plane Imaging n (%) | Biplane Imaging n (%) | p -value univariate | p-value multivariate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Number (906 total) | 330 (36.4) | 576 (63.6) | ||
Recanalization rate (TICI 2b-3) | 280 (84.8) | 480 (83.3) | 0.57 | 0.53 |
Complication rate % | 52 (15.8) | 89 (15.4) | 0.92 | 0.54 |
Procedure delay (min): Median, Q1, Q3 | 45 (30–71) | 44 (30–73) | 0.64 | 0.72 |
24h NIHSS: Median, Q1, Q3 | 11 (4–19) | 12 (4–20) | 0.47 | 0.47 |
3 months good mRS (0–1–2) | 165 (50.0) | 231 (40.1) | <0.0001 | 0.22 |
DAP Gy.cm²: Median, Q1, Q3 | 170 (106–280) | 140 (92–235) | 0.0001 | 0.57 |
Kerma Gy: Median, Q1, Q3 | 0.96 (0.6–1.9) | 0.97 (0.6–1.7) | 0.38 | 0.13 |
Contrast load mL: Median, Q1, Q3 | 200 (150–250) | 100 (60–180) | <0.0001 | 0.0002 |
Scopy duration min: Median, Q1, Q3 | 27 (17–41) | 22 (14–37) | 0.00012 | 0.0008 |
