Table 2 Comparison of MA detection performance by FC-DenseNet56, FC-DenseNet67, and MAs-FC-DenseNet.
From: A new detection model of microaneurysms based on improved FC-DenseNet
Models | Evaluation metrics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PA (%) | MPA (%) | Pre (%) | Re (%) | F1 (%) | MIoU (%) | |
FC-DenseNet56 | 99.96 ± 0.02 | 88.74 ± 0.11 | 77.49 ± 0.17 | 80.87 ± 0.10 | 78.07 ± 0.16 | 82.30 ± 0.09 |
FC-DenseNet67 | 99.96 ± 0.02 | 91.37 ± 0.06 | 82.73 ± 0.09 | 80.94 ± 0.11 | 81.12 ± 0.10 | 84.34 ± 0.09 |
MAs-FC-DenseNet | 99.97 ± 0.01 | 94.19 ± 0.04 | 88.40 ± 0.06 | 89.70 ± 0.05 | 88.98 ± 0.06 | 90.14 ± 0.05 |
