Abstract
A high-throughput computational method is used to predict 39 new superconductors in the Ti-based M\(_2\)AX phases, and the best candidates are then studied in more detail using density functional theory electron–phonon coupling calculations. The detailed calculations agree with the simple predictions, and Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N) materials are predicted to have higher values of \(T_c\) than any currently known hexagonal M\(_2\)AX phases. The electronic states at the Fermi level are dominated by the Ti 3d states. The choice of X (X: B, C and N) has a significant impact on the electronic density of states but not on the phonon characteristics. The electron–phonon coupling parameter for Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N) was determined to be 0.685, 0.743 and 0.775 with a predicted \(T_c\) of 7.8 K, 10.8 K and 13.0 K, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
MAX phases are hexagonal carbides or nitrides with the chemical formula M\(_{n+1}\)AX\(_n\)1 where n = 1, 2, 3, etc. Here, M is an early transition metal, A is mainly group 13–16 and X is either C or N. MAX phases exhibit high damage tolerance, excellent thermal shock resistance, resistance to corrosion and oxidation, high creep lifetime, exceptionally damage-tolerant good machinability, and are electrically and thermally conductive2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. The physical properties of hexagonal carbides and nitrides in the ternary M\(_2\)AX family phase have been extensively studied due to their unusual combination of properties typically associated with metals and ceramics. Additionally, in the last 2 years, some M\(_2\)AX phase ceramics, including B as the X element have been synthesized for the first time13,14,15,16. Boron and its compounds have important technological uses due to their interesting physical and chemical properties17,18. As such, MAX phase borides are also expected to become promising research and application candidates, particularly in the nuclear industry due to their enhanced stability19. Hadi et al. investigated the impact of substituting B for C and N in Nb\(_2\)SX(X:B, C and N) on the structural, electronic, mechanical, thermal and optical properties. They discovered that compared to Nb\(_2\)SC and Nb\(_2\)SN, Nb\(_2\)SB was mechanically stronger, more covalent, more resistant to shear deformation and more elastically and optically isotropic19. Some M\(_2\)AX phases are superconductors, with the highest known \(T_c\) in Nb\(_2\)GeC which has \(T_c\) = 10 K20.
The purpose of this study is to predict new superconducting materials within the Ti-based M\(_2\)AX family and increase the maximum \(T_c\). In addition, we present the first study of superconductivity in the recently synthesized boride-based M\(_2\)AX phases. This is a proof of principle of our high-throughput method to quickly screen M\(_2\)AX superconductors to provide useful guidance for experiments.
Three materials (Ti\(_2\)GeC, Ti\(_2\)InC and Ti\(_2\)InN) were initially studied and compared to known experimental \(T_c\) data to create a high-throughput screening model for Ti-based materials, based on the Fröhlich model we developed to predict \(T_c\) in Nb-C based M\(_2\)AX phases21. We then used this model to screen 42 different Ti\(_2\)AX materials (where A: Al, Si, P, S, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Cd, In, Sn, Tl and Pb; X: B, C and N). For each X it was found that A = Al gave the highest predicted \(T_c\).
In 1963, Jeitschko et al. reported on the manufacture and characterisation of Ti\(_2\)AlN22, from which the hexagonal M\(_2\)AX phase family developed. So far, about 60 M\(_2\)AX phases have been synthesized1, but only 10 of them have been shown to be superconductors in experiment: Mo\(_2\)GaC (4.0 K)23, Nb\(_2\)SC (5.0 K)24, Nb\(_2\)AsC (2.0 K)25, Nb\(_2\)SnC (7.8 K)26, Ti\(_2\)InC (3.1 K)27, Nb\(_2\)InC (7.5 K)28, Ti\(_2\)InN (7.3 K)29, Ti\(_2\)GeC (9.5 K)30, Lu\(_2\)SnC (5.2 K)31 and Nb\(_2\)GeC (10.0 K)20. Of these, Nb\(_2\)GeC has the highest known \(T_c\)=10 K. Attempts to synthesize V\(_2\)AlN have only succeeded in growing the related cubic non-MAX phase, which has recently been shown to be superconducting with \(T_c\) = 15.9 K32. The M\(_2\)AX phases have very useful mechanical properties, including high damage tolerance, excellent thermal shock resistance, resistance to corrosion and oxidation, high creep lifetime, and good machinability, which are properties that are not often found in superconductors, and so could have novel applications.
As our high-throughput model predicted the highest \(T_c\) for Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N), we therefore performed a more detailed study of superconductivity in these materials Whilst the structural, electronic, elastic, thermodynamic, and vibrational properties of Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N) have been studied theoretically33,34,35,36,37 and experimentally35,38, we are unaware of any study of superconductivity in these materials. Thus, this work presents an ab initio study of the superconducting \(T_c\), including electron-phonon coupling, as well as structural, electronic and phonon properties of Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C, and N), using the plane-wave pseudopotential approach to density functional theory (DFT). The Eliashberg spectral function is calculated by combining linear response theory39,40 with Migdal–Eliashberg theory41,42. These quantities are then used to investigate the origin of superconductivity in these materials, and the effect of changing X (X: B, C, and N). In our previous study of superconductivity in Nb-C based M\(_2\)AX phases21 we found that the Migdal–Eliashberg predictions agreed with experimental \(T_c\) values within \(\pm\, 1\) K.
Methods
The calculations used the Quantum Espresso ab initio simulation package39,40,43 with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)44 exchange-correlation approximation and ultrasoft pseudopotentials45. The plane-wave basis cut-off is 60 Ry (\(\sim \) 812 eV) and the Brillouin zone integration used the Monkorst-Pack46 scheme with (\(36 \times 36 \times 8\)) k-mesh (maximum spacing of 0.01 \(\times 2 \pi \text{\AA} ^{-1}\)) whilst electronic and Fermi surface calculations are performed with a denser (\(40 \times 40 \times 10\)) k-mesh.
Phonon calculations used the linear response approach39,40,43 and the Brillouin zone integration for the phonons used a (\(4 \times 4 \times 4\)) q-mesh and twelve dynamical matrices by symmetry. The electron and phonon results are combined to compute the electron-phonon interaction using the Migdal-Eliashberg theory41,42 and hence \(T_c\).
This calculation of \(T_c\) is very computationally demanding, and is therefore impractical for high-throughput screening for novel superconductors. A change in the A element in Ti\(_2\)AX (X: B, C, and N) appears to have a comparable impact to the superconducting isotope effect, and in our previous work21 on Nb-C based M\(_2\)AX phases, we showed that a simple model based upon the Fröhlich47 theory of the isotope effect was an effective foundation for a high-throughput screening approach of these materials, with
where M is the mass of a formula unit, N(E\(_F\)) is the electronic density at the Fermi energy E\(_F\) and T\(_0\) and \(\alpha \) are linear fit parameters. This model has a critical value of \(N(E_F)/\sqrt{M} > T_0/\alpha \) for superconductivity to occur. This functional form is an approximation to the simplified BCS equation48.
In its most basic form, BCS theory gives the superconducting transition temperature \(T_c\) in terms of the electron–phonon interaction (V) and the Debye temperature (\(\Theta _D\)), and can be simplified as
where \(\Theta _D\sim 1/\sqrt{M}\). This exponential form is approximately linear when \(0.2< NV < 0.7\) and saturates at large values of NV. Within each Ti\(_2\)AX family (borides, carbides and nitrides) we might expect a similar V and hence observe behaviour similar to Eq. (1).
The advantage of Eq. (1) is that N(E\(_F\)) can be calculated in much less time (typically less than 1 core hour) than the electron–phonon matrix elements (typically 300 core hours per material), and when combined with the observed trend in \(T_c\) vs. \(N(E_F)/\sqrt{M}\) for known superconducting materials (Ti\(_2\)GeC, Ti\(_2\)InC and Ti\(_2\)InN), it can be used in a high-throughput search to predict the superconducting transition temperatures of candidate materials for which there have been no previous superconductivity studies. The most promising of these is Ti\(_2\)AlX(X: B, C and N) which is then investigated in more detail using full electron–phonon coupling and Migdal–Eliashberg theory.
Results
Superconducting \(T_c\) results
The high-throughput screening is based on our Fröhlich model, which predicts a linear relationship between the critical temperature (\(T_c\)) and the value of N(E\(_F\))/\(\sqrt{M}\) (as shown in Fig. 1). As shown in the Supplementary Information, the \(T_c\) values of three known superconductors (Ti\(_2\)GeC, Ti\(_2\)InC and Ti\(_2\)InN) were calculated using the Eliashberg theory41,42 and the best fit to experimental \(T_c\) values is found when \(\mu ^{*}=\) 0.13 for all 3 materials. These theoretical values are shown in Fig. 1 using blue and magenta squares, whilst the corresponding experimental \(T_c\) values are given in black circles.
In our previous work21 we found that Nb-C based M\(_2\)AX phases containing Al had high \(T_c\) values. Hence we used the Eliashberg theory with \(\mu ^{*}=\) 0.13 to determine the superconductivity temperatures of Ti\(_2\)AlX(X: C and N) and Ti\(_2\)GeN materials, none of which have a known \(T_c\). These results are also plotted in Fig. 1 as blue and magenta squares, and it appears that the M\(_2\)AX carbides and nitrides fall into 2 distinct classes, which we have shown by 2 straight lines.
For Ti\(_2\)AX (A: Al, Ge and In; X: B, C and N), the results for \(T_c\) computed using \(\mu ^*=\) 0.13 using Migdal–Eliashberg theory are presented as red (X = B), blue (X = C) and magenta (X = N) squares, and the corresponding experimental data are displayed as black circles, with linear best fit to the theoretical values in red, blue and magenta dashed lines. Red, blue and magenta dashed lines represent a simple Fröhlich model for estimating superconducting transition temperature \(T_c\). Full data in Tables 1 and 2.
Recently, a new family of boride M\(_2\)AX phases49 has been synthesized but has yet to be tested for superconductivity. We therefore used Eliashberg theory to calculate the superconductivity temperatures of Ti\(_2\)AB(A: Al, Ge, In) using \(\mu ^{*}=\) 0.13 as before, for a direct comparison with the carbides and nitrides. These results are also plotted in Fig. 1 as red squares, and it appears that the borides fall into a third distinct class.
With electron–phonon coupling calculation results of \(T_c\) for 3 materials in each of the Ti-based boride/carbide/nitride families, we can perform a simple linear fit and use this as the basis for our Fröhlich model. The results are summarized in Table 1, and validate the usefulness of our screening method to predict \(T_c\) in novel materials.
We can now use this model in a high-throughput screening approach to quickly evaluate similar materials for which \(T_c\) is unknown. This only requires an electronic DOS calculation (\(\sim \) 1 core hour/material) which is much quicker than calculating the full electron–phonon coupling (\(\sim \) 300 core hours/material).
The full set of Fröhlich model results, for Ti\(_2\)AX (where A: Al, Si, P, S, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Cd, In, Sn, Tl and Pb; X: B, C and N) are shown in Table 2. This shows that the compounds containing Al have the highest superconducting transition temperature for each family, and that Ti\(_2\)AlN is predicted to have the highest superconductivity temperature of any known M\(_2\)AX material. Similarly, Ti\(_2\)AlC is predicted to have the highest \(T_c\) of the carbides, and Ti\(_2\)AlB is predicted to have the highest \(T_c\) of the borides.
As a validation of Eq. (1), we calculated values for \(\Theta _D\) using Quantum Espresso’s QHA package, and these are shown in Table 3 along with the values for \(T_c\) and \(N(E_{F})\). This allows the electron phonon interaction strength (V) to be inferred from Eq. (2). This shows that the borides/carbides/nitrides all follow the same universal form as shown in Fig. 2.
Having presented the \(T_c\) results, we now consider the detailed electronic and phonon properties that underly this behaviour.
Structural, electronic and Fermi surface properties
Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N) crystallizes in the hexagonal structure with space group P6\(_3\)/mmc. The primitive unit cell has two formula units (eight atoms), each of which has occupied Wyckoff coordinates 4f (1/3, 2/3, z) for Ti, 2d (1/3, 2/3, 3/4) for Al, and 2a (0, 0, 0) for B (C and N) atoms. Thus, two lattice parameters, a and c, and one internal structural parameter, z, determine the structure. The hexagonal unit cell is shown in Fig. 3a in which blocks of edge-sharing Ti\(_6\)X octahedra are sandwiched between planes of Al. The hexagonal Brillouin zone is shown in Fig. 3b.
The Murnaghan equation of state was used to compute the lattice constants (a,c), the optimum internal parameter (z) and the bulk modulus (B) for each compound. These are shown in Table 4 and are in excellent agreement with previous theoretical results33,34,36,37.
Figure 4 shows the electronic properties of hexagonal Ti\(_2\)AlX including the band structure in the Brillouin zone, the total and partial density of states (DOS and PDOS), and the Fermi surface. The electronic density of states at the Fermi level (N(E\(_F\))) is important for metallic phases and superconductivity calculations. The PDOS of each component, broken into site and angular momentum contributions, is shown in Fig. 4, and as bands (mostly Ti 3d states) cross the Fermi level, this is the origin of the metallic behaviour. The electrical band structure is similar to that observed in previous studies35,37. Notably, each material has six valence bands that cross the Fermi level.
An analysis of the PDOS of Ti\(_2\)AlN reveals that the lowest energy region, \({-\,16.8< E < -\, 15.6}\) eV, is dominated by the N 2s states with minor contributions from Ti 4s and 3d states. In Ti\(_2\)AlC this low-energy region is dominated by the C 2s orbital and is about 5 eV higher than in Ti\(_2\)AlN. This low-energy region is absent in Ti\(_2\)AlB material.
The main valence band region, \(-\, 8.0< E < -\, 4.0\) eV, is made of hybridised Ti 3d and X 2p states, indicating covalent Ti-X bonding, with increasing covalent character in the order of \(B>C>N\). Hence it is expected that Ti\(_2\)AlN should have higher electrical conductivity than Ti\(_2\)AlB and Ti\(_2\)AlC. The region \(-\, 4.0< E < E_F\) eV is dominated by Ti 3d states with some weak Ti 3d and Al 3p hybridization. In the region \(E>E_F\) the band structure is almost entirely dominated by Ti 3d states.
Qualitatively, it appears that the band structures around the Fermi level for Ti\(_2\)AlX (X = B, C or N) are similar, with the principal difference being a shift of E\(_F\) by 0.5 eV from X = B to X = C, and by 0.2 eV from X = C to X = N. This shift results in a significant increase in N(E\(_F\)). The electronic states at the Fermi level are crucial for superconductivity and we find that the DOS of Ti\(_2\)AlN at the Fermi level is N(E\(_F\)) = 4.568 states/eV, with about 89.3%, 5.9% and 4.8% contributions from Ti, Al, and N atoms, respectively. As a consequence, the conduction properties are dominated by the Ti 3d electrons. Similarly, N(E\(_F\))= 3.048 states/eV for Ti\(_2\)AlC and 2.241 states/eV for Ti\(_2\)AlB. This suggests that the most important contribution to the formation of the superconducting properties of Ti\(_2\)AlX phases come from the Ti 3d states which increase N(E\(_F\)) and enhance \(\lambda \) according to the McMillan–Hopfield expression50:
where \(\langle \omega ^2 \rangle \) denotes the average squared phonon frequency, \(\langle I^2 \rangle \) describe the average squared electron–phonon matrix element and M is the average atomic mass. As Ti\(_2\)AlN has higher N(E\(_F\)) than the other materials, it should result in a higher \(T_c\) value if all other effects are similar.
Figure 4 also shows the Fermi surface of Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N) which again illustrates the dominance of Ti 3d-like bands. The calculated Fermi surface of Ti\(_2\)AlC agrees well with the previous theoretical result35. The Fermi surface of Ti\(_2\)AlB has four sheets, while the Fermi surface of the other two materials contains five sheets. The Fermi surface is completely prismatic and cylindrical in the \(\Gamma \)-A direction and exhibits electron-like behaviour, while hole-like sheets appear at the corners of the Brillouin zone along the H-K and L-M directions. The non-spherical Fermi sheets may also cause a high metallic conductivity51.
Phonons and electron–phonon interaction
Phonons have a crucial role in superconductivity, so the calculated phonon dispersion, total and partial vibrational density of states and electron–phonon spectral function for Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N) are shown in Fig. 5a–c, respectively. All 3 materials have 8 atoms per primitive unit cell, so there are 3 acoustic and 21 optical phonon modes. A detailed study of the zone centre optical phonon modes is given in our previous paper21. As there are no negative frequencies, each structure is dynamically stable. The phonon spectra splits into two distinct frequency regions: a low-frequency region up to 12 THz that contains three acoustic and fifteen optical phonon modes, and a high-frequency region from 15 to 21 THz that contains six optical modes. The \(E_{2g}\) branch of all three materials exhibits a phonon anomaly along the \(\Gamma \)-K direction.
Phonon dispersion curves, total, partial vibrational density of states and the calculated electron-phonon spectral function \(\alpha ^2 F(\omega )\) (red line) and the variation of the electron–phonon coupling parameter (blue line) with rising frequency \(\lambda \)(\(\omega \)) of (a) Ti\(_2\)AlB, (b) Ti\(_2\)AlC and (c) Ti\(_2\)AlN.
There is weak overlap and hybridization of Ti–Al modes in the low-frequency region, and the modes in the high frequency region are dominated by the light X atoms. The DOS in this region has two peaks separated by a small gap for the atoms of Ti\(_2\)AlC and Ti\(_2\)AlN compounds but this gap vanishes for Ti\(_2\)AlB. Overall, the phonon properties of Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N) materials are very similar.
The electron–phonon interaction may be studied using the linear response theory39,40 approach to the Migdal–Eliashberg theory41,42. The average electron-phonon coupling constant \(\lambda \) may be calculated from the Eliashberg spectral function (\(\alpha ^2F(\omega )\)). A detailed study of the Eliashberg spectral function is given in our previous paper21. \(\lambda \) values of Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N) have been calculated as 0.685, 0.743 and 0.775, respectively. Figure 5 confirms that \(\lambda (\omega )\) is dominated by the lowest frequency region, in which \(\lambda \propto \omega \). The low frequency contribution to the total \(\lambda = \) is 93%, 97% and 94%, respectively, and is dominated by the coupled motion of Ti and Al atoms. The high-frequency region makes a minor contribution to \(\lambda \) as this region is dominated by light X atom modes. Using the value of \(\lambda (\omega )\), the logarithmic average phonon frequency (\(\omega _{\ln }\)) is calculated as 219.540 K, 342.218 K and 369.818 K for Ti\(_2\)AlX (X: B, C and N), respectively. The values of \(\lambda \) and \(\omega _{\ln }\) are used to calculate the superconducting transition temperature \(T_c\) using the Allen–Dynes modification of the McMillan formula as discussed in our previous paper21. In most studies, the value of \(\mu ^{*}\) ranges from 0.10 to 0.1650,52. Here, we use \(\mu ^{*}\)=0.13, as this gave the best fit to the experimental \(T_c\) for Ti\(_2\)GeC, Ti\(_2\)InC, and Ti\(_2\)InN (see Supplementary Information). There is currently no known experimental \(T_c\) for Ti\(_2\)AlX and so we use \(\mu ^{*}=\) 0.13 and predict \(T_c =\) 7.8, 10.8, and 13.0 K for Ti\(_2\)AlX (B, C, and N).
Conclusion
We have used a high-throughput approach to study the superconducting properties of 42 different Ti-based M\(_2\)AX phases where A: Al, Si, P, S, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Cd, In, Sn, Tl and Pb; X: B, C and N; as shown in Fig. 1 and detailed in Table 2. Currently, 3 are known to be superconducting in experiment (black circles in Fig. 1). Our screening identified that A = Al has the best potential for a high \(T_c\), and we then studied the properties of Ti\(_2\)AlX (X:B, C and N) in more detail. The M\(_2\)AX phase with the highest known experimental \(T_c\) is Nb\(_2\)GeC which has \(T_c = 9.5~\text {K}\). Our study predicts that Ti\(_2\)AlC will have \(T_c = 10.8~\text {K}\), the highest \(T_c\) for a carbide-based M\(_2\)AX phase. Our high-throughput model also predicts the potential for even higher \(T_c\) in the nitride-based materials, and our detailed calculations predict Ti\(_2\)AlN to have \(T_c = 13.0~\text {K}\). We also demonstrate superconductivity in the boride-based M\(_2\)AX phases for the first time.
Our analysis shows that the electron-phonon coupling is dominated by low-frequency Ti-based phonon modes, and Ti 3d-based electronic states near the Fermi energy. This work should encourage further studies of superconductivity in M\(_2\)AX phases, and the use of Al rather than the more usual Ge or In should have higher \(T_c\) and cost savings.
The high-throughput model developed here, with its detailed justification, should also have application in other systematic studies of superconductivity.
Data availability
The data created and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Hadi, M. Superconducting phases in a remarkable class of metallic ceramics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 138, 109275 (2020).
Barsoum, M. W. The M\(_{N+ 1}\)AX\(_N\) phases: A new class of solids: Thermodynamically stable nanolaminates. Prog. Solid State Chem. 28, 201 (2000).
Barsoum, M., Golczewski, J., Seifert, H. & Aldinger, F. Fabrication and electrical and thermal properties of Ti\(_2\)InC, Hf\(_2\)InC and (Ti, Hf)\(_2\)InC. J. Alloy. Compd. 340, 173 (2002).
Hettinger, J. et al. Electrical transport, thermal transport, and elastic properties of M\(_2\)AlC (M = Ti, Cr, Nb, and V). Phys. Rev. B 72, 115120 (2005).
Manoun, B. et al. Compression behavior of M\(_2\)AlC (M = Ti, V, Cr, Nb, and Ta) phases to above 50 GPa. Phys. Rev. B 73, 024110 (2006).
Eklund, P. et al. Discovery of the ternary nanolaminated compound Nb\(_2\)GeC by a systematic theoretical-experimental approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 035502 (2012).
Kumar, R. S., Rekhi, S., Cornelius, A. & Barsoum, M. W. Compressibility of Nb\(_2\)AsC to 41 GPa. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 111904 (2005).
Schneider, J. M. et al. Elastic properties of Cr\(_2\)AlC thin films probed by nanoindentation and ab initio molecular dynamics. Scr. Mater. 57, 1137 (2007).
Emmerlich, J., Music, D., Houben, A., Dronskowski, R. & Schneider, J. Systematic study on the pressure dependence of M\(_2\)Al C phases (M = Ti, V, Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, Ta, W). Phys. Rev. B 76, 224111 (2007).
Wang, Q. et al. Fabrication and oxidation behavior of Cr\(_2\)AlC coating on Ti6242 alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 204, 2343 (2010).
Hu, C. et al. On the rapid synthesis of the ternary Mo\(_2\)GaC. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98, 2713 (2015).
Bortolozo, A. D., Cremasco, A., Floriano, R. & Contieri, R. J. Effects of microwave heating in nanolaminated Nb\(_2\)GeC synthesis. Ceram. Int. 42, 16343 (2016).
Rackl, T., Eisenburger, L., Niklaus, R. & Johrendt, D. Syntheses and physical properties of the max phase boride Nb\(_2\)Sb and the solid solutions nb\(_2\)Sb\(_x\)C\(_{1-x}\)(x = 0–1). Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 054001 (2019).
Rackl, T. & Johrendt, D. The max phase borides Zr\(_2\)Sb and Hf\(_2\)Sb. Solid State Sci. 106, 106316 (2020).
Qin, Y. et al. Synthesis and characterization of ternary layered Nb\(_2\)sb ceramics fabricated by spark plasma sintering. J. Alloy. Compd. 878, 160344 (2021).
Zhang, Q. et al. Synthesis and property characterization of ternary laminar Zr\(_2\)Sb ceramic. J. Adv. Ceram. 11, 825 (2022).
Kurakevych, O. Superhard phases of simple substances and binary compounds of the bcno system: From diamond to the latest results (a review). J. Superhard Mater. 31, 139 (2009).
Ali, M. et al. Physical properties of new MAX phase borides M\(_2\)SB (M= Zr, Hf and Nb) in comparison with conventional MAX phase carbides M\(_2\)SC (M= Zr, Hf and Nb): Comprehensive insights. J. Market. Res. 11, 1000 (2021).
Hadi, M. et al. A density functional theory approach to the effects of C and N substitution at the B-site of the first boride MAX phase Nb\(_2\)SB. Mater. Today Commun. 29, 102910 (2021).
Bortolozo, A. D., Osorio, W. R., de Lima, B. S., Dos Santos, C. A. M. & Machado, A. J. S. Superconducting evidence of a processed Nb\(_2\)GeC compound under a microwave heating. Mater. Chem. Phys. 194, 219 (2017).
Karaca, E., Byrne, P. J. P., Hasnip, P. J., Tütüncü, H. & Probert, M. Electron–phonon interaction and superconductivity in hexagonal ternary carbides Nb\(_2\)AC (A: Al, S, Ge, As and Sn). Electron. Struct. 3, 045001 (2021).
Jeitschko, W., Nowotny, H. & Benesovsky, F. Ti\(_2\)AlN, eine stickstoffhaltige H-phase. Monatshefte für Chem. verwandte Teile anderer Wissenschaf. 94, 1198 (1963).
Toth, L. High superconducting transition temperatures in the molybdenum carbide family of compounds. J. Less Common Metals 13, 129 (1967).
Sakamaki, K., Wada, H., Nozaki, H., Ōnuki, Y. & Kawai, M. Carbosulfide superconductor. Solid State Commun. 112, 323 (1999).
Lofland, S. et al. Electron-phonon coupling in M\(_{n+ 1}\)AX\(_n\)-phase carbides. Phys. Rev. B 74, 174501 (2006).
Bortolozo, A. et al. Superconductivity in the Nb\(_2\)SnC compound. Solid State Commun. 139, 57 (2006).
Bortolozo, A., Sant-Anna, O., Dos Santos, C. & Machado, A. Superconductivity in the hexagonal-layered nanolaminates Ti\(_2\)InC compound. Solid State Commun. 144, 419 (2007).
Bortolozo, A., Fisk, Z., Sant’Anna, O., Dos Santos, C. & Machado, A. Superconductivity in Nb\(_2\)InC. Physica C 469, 256 (2009).
Bortolozo, A. et al. Superconductivity at 7.3 K in Ti\(_2\)InN. Solid State Commun. 150, 1364 (2010).
Bortolozo, A., Sant-Anna, O., Dos Santos, C. & Machado, A. Superconductivity at 9.5 K in the Ti\(_2\)GeC compound. Mater. Sci. Poland 30, 92 (2012).
Kuchida, S. et al. Superconductivity in Lu\(_2\)SnC. Physica C 494, 77 (2013).
Li, J. et al. Appearance of superconductivity at 15.9 K in layered V\(_2\)AlN. J. Supercond. Novel Magn. 30, 1 (2017).
Cover, M. F., Warschkow, O., Bilek, M. M. & McKenzie, D. R. Elastic properties of Ti\(_{n+1}\)AlC\(_n\) and Ti\(_{n+1}\)AlN\(_n\) MAX phases. Adv. Eng. Mater. 10, 935 (2008).
Barsoum, M. W. & Radovic, M. Elastic and mechanical properties of the MAX phases. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 41, 195 (2011).
Mauchamp, V. et al. Anisotropy of the resistivity and charge-carrier sign in nanolaminated Ti\(_2\)AlC: Experiment and ab initio calculations. Phys. Rev. B 87, 235105 (2013).
Khazaei, M., Arai, M., Sasaki, T., Estili, M. & Sakka, Y. Trends in electronic structures and structural properties of MAX phases: A first-principles study on M\(_2\)AlC (M= Sc, Ti, Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, or Ta), M\(_2\)AlN, and hypothetical M\(_2\)AlB phases. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 505503 (2014).
Surucu, G. Investigation of structural, electronic, anisotropic elastic, and lattice dynamical properties of MAX phases borides: An ab-initio study on hypothetical M\(_2\)AB (M = Ti, Zr, Hf; A = Al, Ga, In) compounds. Mater. Chem. Phys. 203, 106 (2018).
Lepakova, O., Karakchieva, N., Golobokov, N., Gal’chenko, N. & Afanas’ev, N. High-temperature synthesis of Ti–Si–B and Ti–Al–B composites and coatings. Int. J. Self Propag. High Temp. Synth. 29, 150 (2020).
Giannozzi, P. et al. Quantum Espresso: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).
Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum Espresso. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017).
Migdal, A. Interaction between electrons and lattice vibrations in a normal metal. Sov. Phys. JETP 7, 996 (1958).
Eliashberg, G. Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor. Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 696 (1960).
Baroni, S., Giannozzi, P. & Isaev, E. Density-functional perturbation theory for quasi-harmonic calculations. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 71, 39 (2010).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
Rappe, A. M., Rabe, K. M., Kaxiras, E. & Joannopoulos, J. Optimized pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 41, 1227 (1990).
Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
Fröhlich, H. Theory of the superconducting state. I. The ground state at the absolute zero of temperature. Phys. Rev. 79, 845 (1950).
Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. & Schrieffer, J. Theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).
Wang, J. et al. Discovery of hexagonal ternary phase Ti\(_2\)InB\(_2\) and its evolution to layered boride TiB. Nat. Commun. 10, 2284 (2019).
Allen, P. B. & Dynes, R. Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed. Phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975).
Hadi, M. et al. Insights into the physical properties of a new 211 MAX phase Nb\(_2\)CuC. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 149, 109759 (2021).
Allen, P. & Dynes, R. Superconductivity at very strong coupling. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 8, L158 (1975).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) (2219 International Post Doctoral Research Fellowship Programme Project Number 1059B191900055). P.J.H. was funded by an EPSRC RSE Fellowship (EPSRC Grant EP/R025770/1). P.J.B. was funded by the UKCP High End Compute Consortium (EPSRC Grant EP/P022561/1). This project was undertaken on the Viking Cluster, which is a high performance compute facility provided by the University of York. We are grateful for computational support from the University of York HPC service.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors co-wrote the paper. E.K. performed the DFT calculations, P.J.P.B. and P.J.H. gave theoretical and computational insights and guidance, M.I.J.P. conceived and designed the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Karaca, E., Byrne, P.J.P., Hasnip, P.J. et al. Prediction of phonon-mediated superconductivity in new Ti-based M\(_2\)AX phases. Sci Rep 12, 13198 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17539-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17539-8
This article is cited by
-
Factors influencing synthesis and properties of MAX phases
Science China Materials (2024)
-
Cr\(_2\)AlN and the search for the highest temperature superconductor in the M\(_2\)AX family
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Stability and physical properties of yttrium-based new MAX phases Y2AX (A = Al, Si, Ga, and Ge; X = C and N): a first-principles prediction
Applied Physics A (2023)







