Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13947-y, published online 20 June 2022
The original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 6 where the axes labels were omitted in the subplots. The original Figure 6 and accompanying legend appear below.
Improvement in AULCSF (Area Under Log Contrast Sensitivity Function). (a) Distribution of change from baseline (CFB) in AULCSF in children and adults. (b) Time course of contrast sensitivity recovery in children. The negative exponential fit indicates improvement (solid line) during the therapy (thick black line) and the expected improvement rate (dotted line) had the therapy been continued. Children’s improvement remained stable at 1-m follow-up without regression. (c) Division of children’s change over time based on the exponent of the fitted exponential: green, red, and gray indicates improvement, decline, and no change, respectively. (d, e) Results of the prediction analysis: (d) Patients’ improvement had a definitive dependence on their baseline contrast sensitivity: patients improved almost as much as there was room for improvement, given that they did not have either of two limiting factors: initial stereoblindness or acuity equal to or below a critical visual acuity of 0.4 logMAR. (e) The improvement of patients with only one of the limiting factors also lie along the same linear fit calculated for patients without either of the limiting factors, whereas patient affected by both factors showed no or very limited improvement. Red circles signify initially stereoblind patients, white dots in the center of datapoints mark acuity equal to or below 0.4 logMAR, while a light gray line indicates a linear fit for patients without limiting factors, which is copied to (e) as well. NCh = 24, NAd = 18, except for (d, e), where NCh = 22, NAd = 16. Means ± SEM.
The original Article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bankó, É.M., Barboni, M.T.S., Markó, K. et al. Publisher Correction: Fixation instability, astigmatism, and lack of stereopsis as factors impeding recovery of binocular balance in amblyopia following binocular therapy. Sci Rep 12, 13249 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17574-5
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17574-5
