Abstract
In this work, we present the laser cleaning of a Rubidium vapor cell and the Raman analysis of the contaminant material to be removed. The optical window of the vapor cell had gradually lost transparency due to the development of an opaque layer of unknown composition at the inner side during the normal operation of the cell. Laser cleaning was successfully performed by a frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser focusing the beam inside the cell, avoiding any possible damage to the window. A single laser pulse was enough to clear away the black discoloration at the focal spot and locally restore the transparency of the window. The Raman spectra of the deposit showed peaks not yet described in the literature. Comparison with known Rubidium germanate spectra and simulation results strongly suggested that the unknown material was Rubidium silicate.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Rubidium vapor cells have many applications both for commercial and research purposes. The most widespread among them is the rubidium frequency standard (RFS). Based on the hyperfine split of the ground state of rubidium a crystal oscillator can be locked to 6.8347 GHz. The stability of the commercial devices is as good as 0.5–1 × 1011 1/s1. RFS has found its applications since the 1950’s in atomic clocks, aerospace, telecommunications and aerospace industry2,3.
Optical magnetometers belong to the most sensitive tools to measure magnetic field. They utilize the interaction between light and a resonant medium, that is many times vapor of alkali atoms (among others rubidium) confined in a glass cell. Thanks to high accuracy and ease of use, optical magnetometers are now used in earth and material science, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and various other fields4.
Rubidium vapor is also prone to develop transverse optical patterns due to resonant light propagation. Some of these pattern types exhibit complicated dynamic behaviour such as bistability and hysteresis in switching from one to another. This phenomenon may be exploited as optical memory5. While nearly resonant interaction is suitable of reshaping ultrashort laser pulses6.
Recent results of applying rubidium plasma for laser wake field acceleration (LWFA) are encouraging. LWFA is based on the concept that a high-density plasma is created by an ultrashort laser pulse, which is followed by a wake field wave. In this wave strong electric fields are generated, which can exceed by multiple orders of magnitude the electric field of conventional particle accelerators limited by material breakdown. Therefore extremely high acceleration gradient can be achieved offering the prospect of new, compact and cost-efficient particle accelerators for research and medical applications7,8,9,10. Such systems, however, require high quality optical cells containing the rubidium vapor and having clear optical windows with minimal losses, as well as solutions securing long term operation of these windows by the elimination of contaminations, if any.
Laser cleaning is, in fact, the purposeful utilization of laser radiation to remove any unwanted surface layer from a substrate. By properly setting the irradiation parameters like power, wavelength, focal position and pulse duration, very precise removal of the surface layer can be attained without damage to the base material. Especially good results can be expected when the optical properties of the two materials (layer and substrate), such as absorbance of the laser radiation, differ significantly11,12,13.
Since the pioneering work of Asmus et al. in the 1970s14, laser cleaning has become a well-established method in the preservation of cultural heritage. Nowadays it’s widely used in restoration of historical buildings11,13,15,16,17,18,19, sculptures20,21 and metal artifacts12,22. It has many advantages to the traditional mechanical and chemical cleaning techniques, such as reduced cost, the demand for manual work and impact on the environment13,19.
Its efficiency, low cycle time and material effort coupled with a high level of automation made laser cleaning a lucrative alternative for industrial actors as well. Most commonly, it is used for material preparation before manufacturing in the semiconductor and microelectronic industry, machine industry and waste recycling23,24,25,26,27,28. In addition, there are also studies about utilization in the nuclear industry for decontamination purposes29.
For obvious reasons laser cleaning is most common for very rugged base materials like stone, usually limestone, granite or marble11,13,17,18,19,30,31,32,33,34 and metal, usually iron, steel, copper, bronze or even noble metals12,22,23,29,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45. Examples of applications to sensitive objects exist but are far less frequent. This group ranges from frescos46,47 to samples as vulnerable as historical paper42,48,49 and fabric artifacts41 or a fusion diagnostic mirror50. Applications on glass substrates have also been reported51,52,53,54,55. There is also a wide range of surface layers to be removed according to the base material and purpose of the cleaning. Black crusts and graffiti are common issues for restoration of historical buildings11,12,15,18,20,56,57, tarnish for metal artefacts22,41, oxide and paint layers and contamination for material preparation23,36,39,40,58.
Process control of the laser cleaning is an essential factor in finding the appropriate irradiation parameters and achieving an efficient layer removal. For historical buildings, visual inspection of the cleaned surface is usually sufficient, but for more demanding samples, a complex approach is necessarily composed of optical microscopy and an appropriate selection of material analysis techniques like Raman spectroscopy, optical reflection spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray analysis11,16,22,37,38,39,40,41,44,45,49,59,60. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy is a promising method to control the ablation during the cleaning process or analyze the surface before it17,31,32,33,52,58,61,62.
Contamination of optical windows of vapor cells (and other optical parts) is a well-known problem originating from these components' operational environment and conditions. The contamination has a negative effect on their optical performance since it can decrease the transmitted laser intensity, modify the wavefront of the laser pulses, and even facilitate laser-induced damage during the operation of the system by creating localized absorption. Most of such contamination consists of particulate material. Earlier studies dealing with the particle contamination of surfaces of optical elements and focusing on identifying the origin of contamination63 showed that contamination could originate from various sources, including particles from the surrounding environment and products of laser-induced damage of the optics itself or adjacent parts, and therefore can involve various types of materials64. Depending on the type of the contamination particle, its interaction with a laser pulse can be characterized by three main effects: particle removal, secondary contamination of the surface by fragments of the original contamination particle, and laser-induced damage of the host surface. The first type of interaction is, in fact, laser cleaning. This effect was used to remove particles from aluminium mirror surfaces with high efficiency by using a pulsed UV laser source65. However, there is no example in the literature for removing the rubidium-based layer from a glass substrate, especially not from the inner walls of a closed rubidium cell.
In this work, we present the laser cleaning procedure of a worn rubidium vapor cell together with the Raman analysis of the black discoloration. The cell was used to generate and characterize plasma in rubidium vapors by intense femtosecond laser pulses.
Experimental details
Sample and measurement points
The sample was a worn Rubidium cell from a laser-induced plasma generation experiment, which was no longer in use due to the poor transparency of the exit window (Fig. 1). For the plasma generation, the glass cell filled with rubidium vapor was placed in a vacuum chamber incorporating a temperature-controlled oven. The cell is a cylindrical glass tube of 2.5 cm outer diameter with optical quality quartz end windows. The temperature of the cell and, consequently, the density of the rubidium vapor were varied during the experiments. The plasma was generated by an ionizing Ti–sapphire laser (Legend, Coherent Inc.) operating at 800 nm wavelength and 1 kHz repetition rate, with a pulse duration of about 40 fs and maximum pulse energy of 4 mJ. The laser beam was aligned longitudinally along the glass cell inside the vacuum system, and the transmitted fraction of the laser light was blocked by an appropriate beam dump66.
The optical windows of the rubidium vapor cell are made of quartz. While these windows of a new cell are obviously clear, two types of opaque areas can be distinguished on the internal surface of the exit window of the examined worn cell (Fig. 2). The metallic and reddish color areas are of metallic rubidium deposits on the window, which are present in a continuous layer (on the right perimeter of the window, mark no. 3 in Fig. 2) and small droplets (left part, mark no. 5 in Fig. 2). It does not compromise in any form the functionality of the cell since, under operating conditions, the rubidium is in vapor phase and not present on the surface. Furthermore, in the central part of the window, an amorphous discolouration can be observed, which consists of a matte black region (mark no. 1 in Fig. 2) with a grey halo (mark no. 2 in Fig. 2). The exact composition of this layer is unknown. However, it is a plausible supposition that during the experiments, the laser pulses heated/ablated the quartz material and the emitted material interacted with rubidium forming some kind of rubidium silicates, especially if we consider the fact that the laser irradiation of the quartz window was the most intense at the area where this surface alteration occurred. Last but not least, a large intact quartz surface is present (mark no. 4 in Fig. 2), which offers an ideal location for reference measurements.
Laser cleaning
The laser cleaning tests of the colored surface were performed by a Quantel Brilliant Q-switched Nd:YAG laser operating at its fundamental wavelength (1064 nm). The pulse width was 3.2 ns (FWHM). Various pulse energies were used during the experiments, cautiously increasing the energy from 50 to 360 mJ (maximum output of the laser in question) by setting the time delay between the flash lamp and Q-switch. The laser beam profile was Gaussian with a beam diameter of 5 mm.
The laser radiation was passing through the intact window of the cell, focused by a biconvex converging lens of 295 mm focal length to a point 1 mm in front of the contaminated surface (at the inner side of the window) to minimize heat stress to the glass material and prevent the formation of micro-cracks threatening with the destruction of the sample (Fig. 3). The laser was operated in single pulse mode for the same reason.
The fluence can be calculated to 400 J/cm2 (1.25 × 1011 W/cm2), assuming ideal focusing conditions and considering the 50 mJ pulse energy, 5 mm beam diameter, 295 mm focal length with 1 mm defocusing. With 360 mJ (maximum pulse energy), the fluence is around 3 kJ/cm2 (9 × 1011 W/cm2). These values are generally enough to ignite weak microplasmas, thus triggering shockwaves to boost cleaning efficiency and possibly enable LIBS analysis.
The irradiated surface was placed perpendicular to the laser beam. Scanning the sample in 2D was performed by a manual stage, keeping the defocusing constant and discharging only one pulse at one point of the sample.
A Stellarnet Bluewave compact Czerny–Turner spectrographs were coupled to the laser to perform LIBS analysis for enhanced control of the cleaning process if the laser irradiation generated microplasma (Fig. 3).
Raman analysis
Raman spectroscopic measurements were performed on a Horiba Jobin Yvon portable Micro-Raman spectrometer with 532 nm excitation. The excitation laser beam was focused onto different areas of the internal surface of the optical window from the outside by using a Nikon 50× objective lens (NA = 0.75). The Raman spectra were recorded in the 200–1000 cm−1 region with 6 cm−1 resolution.
The self-consistent density functional theory (DFT) field method using the hybrid B3LYP functional consisting of a linear combination of the pure corrected exchange functional by Becke67 and the three-parameter gradient-corrected correlation functional by Lee et al.68 was applied for geometry optimizations of these clusters and Raman spectra calculations using the Gaussian-09 program package69. The Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) double zeta (DZ) valence basis set (LANL2DZ) was used for all atoms in the cluster models70. The vibrational contribution of saturating hydrogen atoms in the calculated Raman spectra of Rb2Si2O8H6, Si3O9H6 and Rb2Si3O10H6 clusters were eliminated as described elsewhere71,72. The Lorentz-shape function with the intensity proportional to the calculated Raman activity and with full width at half-height (FWHH) of 10 cm−1 was used to simulate the Raman spectra of clusters.
Results and discussion
Removal of the residues
The minimum laser pulse energy was applied, targeting the black surface at point 1 in Fig. 2. It was enough to restitute the window's transparency in a spot of 0.6 mm diameter (Fig. 4).
Observing no damage to the window, the fluence was gradually increased from the minimum value to the maximum (roughly 3 kJ/cm2, as discussed above). During the laser irradiation, the coloration of the window disappeared, which became transparent anew. The cleaned and the intact surfaces showed no difference at optical microscope inspection. During the process, no microplasma generation was observed.
Considering that the window is practically fully transparent to the laser radiation after the ablation of the surface contamination, the absorbed energy density is probably much less. It explains why no plasma was formed by experimental parameters usually suitable for LIBS measurements.
Composition of the contamination
Raman spectroscopic measurements were performed on the black central and grey outer part of the contamination, the rubidium layer and the clean glass (marked with X signs in Fig. 2) to determine the origin of the contamination in the central part of the optical window. Several Raman spectra were recorded in each area that was found to be characteristic of all four spots. These spectra are compared in Fig. 5. The spectrum of the clear glass consists of broad peaks with a high-intensity asymmetric band in the 200–600 cm−1 region. The Raman peaks observable in this spectrum are characteristic of fused silica. They can be attributed to the vibrations of oxygen atoms within the silica tetrahedra (at 440 cm−1), breathing vibrations of oxygen atoms in 4-membered rings (at 490 cm−1) and 3-membered rings (610 cm−1), respectively, various bending and stretching motions (at 793 cm−1) and stretching involving SiO4 tetrahedral units and/or Si–O–Si bonds (1067 cm−1 and 1200 cm−1)73,74. The spectrum recorded in the area of the rubidium film is very similar to the previous one, indicating that the metal covering the quartz window in these places does not incorporate into the glass matrix.
On the other hand, the Raman spectrum of the contamination is remarkably different (grey and black spots in Fig. 6). A strong and narrow peak dominates the curves of both the grey and black regions at 278 cm−1. Additional new bands of smaller intensity can also be detected at 350, 460, 556, 910 and 1045 cm−1. From these new peaks, the 350, 910 and 1045 cm−1 ones are present in the spectrum of the black spot only. The characteristic Raman features of the fused silica can also be observed, serving as a background for the new peaks. However, the shape of some bands differs from that observed in the clean spot spectrum, indicating the glass's structural transformation in the contamination area.
The contaminant was formed under high-energy pulsed laser radiation in a closed cell filled with rubidium vapor. Therefore, it can be assumed that the grey and black discolored residues consist of the material inside the cell, namely quartz and/or rubidium—moreover, the easy contamination removal by a cca. 3 kJ/cm2 nanosecond pulsed laser indicates that it is a particulate material aggregated on the inner surface of the quartz window (and not the result of the incorporation of the metal into the glass), and the new Raman peaks arise from this structure.
The effect of alkali cations on Raman spectra and the structure of SiO2 glasses were investigated earlier75. The differences in the silicate networks of (M2O)x(SiO2)100-x glasses (M = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs and x = 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30) were established and characteristic vibrational modes in the Raman spectra of alkali-silicate glasses were also reported. In general, it was found that the bands in the 900–1200 cm−1 spectral region result from highly localized Si-nonbridging oxygen stretching modes, allowing to determine the alkali distributions around SiO4 tetrahedra.
The Raman intensity of the low frequency spectral bands at 500 and 600 cm−1 in the Raman spectra of rubidium-silicate glasses are found to increase with increasing of Rb content. First band was assigned to highly delocalized vibrational mode of both bridging and non-bridging oxygens in the silicate network, while the second band can originate from a vibrational mode localized on a defect structure75. The highly localized vibrational mode at 950 cm−l in the Raman spectra of rubidium disilicate glass result from Si–O stretching in SiO4 tetrahedral units containing two non-bridging oxygens. The spectral features at 1100 and 1150 cm−1 in the Raman spectra of rubidium-silicate glasses indicate the presence of two distinct structural environments in which an SiO4 tetrahedron contains one non-bridging oxygen75.
The features observed in the Raman spectrum of the contaminant can also be compared with the Raman spectra of the xRb2O(1 − x)GeO2 rubidium germanate system74, since the structure of silicate (quartz) glasses is similar to that of germanates (both are composed of tetrahedral—silicate and germanate, respectively). There, three peaks were reported at 250, 370 and 512 cm−1, the intensity of which increases with Rb2O content. They were attributed to the Raman active bending modes of Q2, and Q1 tetrahedra of the germanate, which become localized as the number of non-bridging oxygen atoms increases and the germanate tetrahedron starts acquiring molecular-like character. The appearance of these new peaks was also accompanied by a redistribution of Raman intensities in the 720–870 cm−1 region, where a broad band can be attributed to Ge–O− vibrations of different Q0–Q3 germanate tetrahedrons. The shift of the Raman bands towards lower wavenumbers in this region was attributed to the decrease of Q3 and Q2 type tetrahedrons and the increase of the Q1 and Q0 species with rubidium content74. All these structural transformations were attributed to the incorporation of the rubidium oxide into the glass network.
Features similar to those described for xRb2O(1 − x)GeO2 can be observed in the Raman spectra recorded in different areas of the quartz window of the worn vapor cell. A comparison of the Raman spectrum of the contamination with that of the clear glass in our vapor cell shows the appearance of the 278, 350 and 545 cm−1 bands, accompanied by changes in the 900–1100 cm−1 region belonging to different Q0–Q3 species of the silicate tetrahedra. Although the peak positions are different from those observed in rubidium–germanate (mainly because of the presence of heavier Ge in the latter instead of Si, shifting the Raman peaks to lower wavenumbers), the similar changes in the Raman spectra imply the incorporation of rubidium into the silicate structure causing the increase of the amount of non-bridging oxygen and formation of molecular-like Q2 and Q1 tetrahedra. So the black contaminant is a silicate glass containing rubidium, presumably in oxide form.
In order to verify this interpretation of the Raman features, the molecular modeling of different gas-phase silicon-oxide, rubidium-silicon, rubidium-oxide and rubidium-silicon-oxide clusters was performed (Fig. 7).
Figure 8 show the comparison of experimental Raman spectra of rubidium cell measured in the regions of clean SiO2 glass (curve 1) and contaminated black spot (curve 2) together with the simulated Raman spectra of different clusters (curves 3–8). The experimental Raman spectra of tridymite polymorph of silica is also shown for comparison (curve 9). As can be seen, the vibrations of Rb4Si4 and Rb2O9 clusters can contribute to the low frequency region of experimental Raman spectra of black spot. Two Raman active modes at 208 and 362 cm−1 were calculated for Rb4Si4 cluster. The main characteristic Raman mode of rubidium suboxide (Rb2O9 cluster) is located at 239 cm−1 (Fig. 8, curves 3 and 4). Therefore, the two bands in the experimental Raman spectra at 278 and 360 cm−1 can be related with the presence of structures based on Rb–Si and Rb–O clusters. However, the Rb4Si4 and Rb2O9 clusters have no high frequency vibrational modes observed in the experimental Raman spectra.
Experimental Raman spectra of rubidium cell measured in the regions of clean SiO2 glass (1) and contaminated black spot (2) together with the simulated Raman spectra of Rb4Si4 (3), Rb2O9 (4), SiO4 anion (5), Rb2Si2O8H6 (6), Si3O9H6 (7), Rb2Si3O10H6 (8) clusters calculated at B3LYP/LANL2DZ level of theory. The experimental Raman spectra of tridymite polymorph of silica (9) is also shown for comparison76.
The high frequency Raman modes can be related with the entire transformations of silica network surface induced by Rb ions. Therefore, the additional cluster models were used to verify this idea. First, the isolated SiO4 anion was used and the Raman active modes of this cluster were calculated at 310, 436 and 582 cm−1 (Fig. 8, curve 5). Then, the two SiO4 tetrahedra each with one non-bridging oxygen were used to model the Rb incorporation in the glass structure (cluster Rb2Si2O8H6). As can be seen, the calculated Raman modes of this cluster at 696 and 1036 cm−1 are in good accordance with the experimental bands at 705 and 1045 cm−1 observed in the Raman spectra of black spot (Fig. 8, curves 2 and 6). In addition, the model built from three corner sharing SiO4 tetrahedra were used to study the influence of Rb atoms on the structure and vibrational properties of simplest 6-membered ring. The calculated Raman modes of Si3O9H6 cluster at 524/556 and 906 cm−1 agree well with the experimental bands at 556 and 910 cm−1 observed in the Raman spectra of black spot (Fig. 8, curves 2 and 7). The presence of non-bridging oxygens (O− charged defects) in the ring model can lead to the incorporation of Rb cation (cluster Rb2Si3O10H6). The main Raman active modes of this cluster calculated at 532 and 1010 cm−1 are in good agreement with the experimental bands at 556 and 1045 cm−1 (Fig. 8, curves 2 and 8). Therefore, it is possible to conclude that high frequency Raman modes at 910 and 1045 cm−1 in the Raman spectra of black spot can originate from Rb incorporation and subsequent network transformation (defect SiO2 and Rb–SiO2 ring formation) occurred in the near surface layers of SiO2 glass. Furthermore, the low frequency bands at 205, 301, 350 cm−1 observed in the Raman spectra of tridymite polymorph of SiO276 (Fig. 8, curve 9) can be an additional support of the transformation of SiO2 network surface at presence of rubidium cation.
Conclusion
It has been demonstrated that laser cleaning is an efficient tool for removing the contamination of the Rubidium vapor cells. The transparency of the optical window contaminated on the internal surface inside the closed cell was successfully restored with a single shot of a frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser without inflicting any damage to the window itself. The Raman analysis of the contaminant displayed peaks, which had not been described in the literature before. Comparison of the Raman spectra of the sample with reference spectra together with calculated Raman spectra of model structures showed that the material of the discoloration consisted of Rubidium silicates formed upon irradiation of the rubidium vapor with high-intensity femtosecond laser pulses.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Godone, A., Levi, F., Calosso, C. E. & Micalizio, S. High-performing vapor-cell frequency standards. Riv. del Nuovo Cim. 38(3), 133–171. https://doi.org/10.1393/ncr/i2015-10110-4 (2015).
Camparo, J. The rubidium atomic clock and basic research. Phys. Today 60(11), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2812121 (2007).
Riley, W. J. A history of the rubidium frequency standard. UFFC-S Hist., 1–34. Accessed 8 Sept 2022. http://www.wriley.com/AHistoryoftheRubidiumFrequencyStandard.pdf (2019).
Budker, D. & Romalis, M. Optical magnetometry. Nat. Phys. 3(4), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys566 (2007).
Korneev, N. & Torres, Y. M. Pattern-based optical memory with low power switching in rubidium vapor. Opt. Commun. 291, 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2012.10.075 (2013).
Vdović, S., Skenderović, H. & Pichler, G. Pulse reshaping in nearly resonant interaction of femtosecond pulses with dense rubidium vapor. Opt. Commun. 371, 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.03.077 (2016).
Rosenzweig, J., Barov, N., Murokh, A., Colby, E. & Colestock, P. Towards a plasma wake-field acceleration-based linear collider. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 410(3), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00186-7 (1998).
Papp, I. et al. Laser wake field collider. Phys. Lett. Sect. A Gen. At. Solid State Phys. 396, 127245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127245 (2021).
Schroeder, C. B., Benedetti, C., Esarey, E. & Leemans, W. P. Laser-plasma-based linear collider using hollow plasma channels. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 829, 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.03.001 (2016).
Joulaei, A. et al. Laser pulse propagation in a meter scale rubidium vapor/plasma cell in AWAKE experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 829, 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.02.076 (2016).
Rivas, T., Pozo, S., Fiorucci, M. P., López, A. J. & Ramil, A. Nd:YVO4 laser removal of graffiti from granite. Influence of paint and rock properties on cleaning efficacy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 263, 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2012.09.110 (2012).
Siano, S. et al. Laser cleaning in conservation of stone, metal, and painted artifacts: State of the art and new insights on the use of the Nd:YAG lasers. Appl. Phys. A 106(2), 419–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-011-6690-8 (2012).
Pozo-Antonio, J. S., Rivas, T., López, A. J., Fiorucci, M. P. & Ramil, A. Effectiveness of granite cleaning procedures in cultural heritage: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 571, 1017–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2016.07.090 (2016).
Asmus, J. F., Murphy, C. G. & Munk, W. H. Studies on the interaction of laser radiation with art artifacts. Dev. Laser Technol. II 0041, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.953831 (1974).
Penide, J. et al. Removal of graffiti from quarry stone by high power diode laser. Opt. Lasers Eng. 51(4), 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTLASENG.2012.12.002 (2013).
Wakefield, R. D., Brechet, E. & McStay, D. Effect of laser cleaning on Scottish granite. Lasers Tools Manuf. II 2993, 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.270035 (1997).
Senesi, G. S., Carrara, I., Nicolodelli, G., Milori, D. M. B. P. & De Pascale, O. Laser cleaning and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy applied in removing and characterizing black crusts from limestones of Castello Svevo, Bari, Italy: A case study. Microchem. J. 124, 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICROC.2015.09.011 (2016).
Sabatini, G., Giamello, M., Pini, R., Siano, S. & Salimbeni, R. Laser cleaning methodologies for stone façades and monuments: Laboratory analyses on lithotypes of Siena architecture. J. Cult. Herit. 1(2), S9 (2000).
Pozo-Antonio, J. S., Ramil, A., Rivas, T., López, A. J. & Fiorucci, M. P. Effectiveness of chemical, mechanical and laser cleaning methods of sulphated black crusts developed on granite. Constr. Build. Mater. 112, 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.02.195 (2016).
Pouli, P., Oujja, M. & Castillejo, M. Practical issues in laser cleaning of stone and painted artefacts: Optimisation procedures and side effects. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 106(2), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00339-011-6696-2 (2012).
Pelosi, C. et al. An integrated approach to the conservation of a wooden sculpture representing Saint Joseph by the workshop of Ignaz Günther (1727–1775): Analysis, laser cleaning and 3D documentation. J. Cult. Herit. 17, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CULHER.2015.07.004 (2016).
Palomar, T. et al. Evaluation of laser cleaning for the restoration of tarnished silver artifacts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 387, 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2016.06.017 (2016).
Lee, J.-M. & Watkins, K. Laser removal of oxides and particles from copper surfaces for microelectronic fabrication. Opt. Express 7(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.7.000068 (2000).
Lee, S. H., Park, J. G., Lee, J. M., Cho, S. H. & Cho, H. K. Si wafer surface cleaning using laser-induced shock wave: A new dry cleaning methodology. Surf. Coat. Technol. 169–170, 178–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00038-0 (2003).
Turner, M. W., Schmidt, M. J. J. & Li, L. Preliminary study into the effects of YAG laser processing of titanium 6Al-4V alloy for potential aerospace component cleaning application. Appl. Surf. Sci. 247(1–4), 623–630 (2005).
Turner, M. W., Crouse, P. L., Li, L. & Smith, A. J. E. Investigation into CO 2 laser cleaning of titanium alloys for gas-turbine component manufacture. Appl. Surf. Sci. 252(13), 4798–4802 (2006).
Veĭko, V. P. et al. Laser decontamination of metallic surfaces. J. Opt. Technol. 74(8), 536. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOT.74.000536 (2007).
Graf, J. et al. Matrix laser cleaning: A new technique for the removal of nanometer sized particles from semiconductors. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 88(2), 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00339-007-4017-6 (2007).
Roberts, D. E. & Modise, T. S. Laser removal of loose uranium compound contamination from metal surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253(12), 5258–5267 (2007).
Cooper, M. I., Emmony, D. C. & Larson, J. Characterization of laser cleaning of limestone. Opt. Laser Technol. 27(1), 69–73 (1995).
Gobernado-Mitre, I., Prieto, A. C., Zafiropulos, V., Spetsidou, Y. & Fotakis, C. On-line monitoring of laser cleaning of limestone by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and laser-induced fluorescence. Appl. Spectrosc. 51(8), 1125–1129. https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702971941944 (1997).
Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P., Anglos, D., Kilikoglou, V. & Zafiropulos, V. Compositional characterization of encrustation on marble with laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta B At. Spectrosc. 56(6), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0584-8547(01)00226-9 (2001).
Maravelaki, P. V., Zafiropulos, V., Kilikoglou, V., Kalaitzaki, M. & Fotakis, C. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy as a diagnostic technique for the laser cleaning of marble. Spectrochim. Acta B At. Spectrosc. 52(1), 41–53 (1997).
Klein, S. et al. Discoloration of marble during laser cleaning by Nd:YAG laser wavelengths. Appl. Surf. Sci. 171(3–4), 242–251 (2001).
Curran, C., Lee, J. M. & Watkins, K. G. Ultraviolet laser removal of small metallic particles from silicon wafers. Opt. Lasers Eng. 38(6), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-8166(02)00022-2 (2002).
Chen, G. X., Kwee, T. J., Tan, K. P., Choo, Y. S. & Hong, M. H. Laser cleaning of steel for paint removal. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 101(2), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00339-010-5811-0 (2010).
Guan, Y. C. et al. Laser surface cleaning of carbonaceous deposits on diesel engine piston. Appl. Surf. Sci. 270, 526–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2013.01.075 (2013).
Tang, Q. H., Zhou, D., Wang, Y. L. & Liu, G. F. Laser cleaning of sulfide scale on compressor impeller blade. Appl. Surf. Sci. 355, 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2015.07.128 (2015).
Kearns, A. et al. Laser removal of oxides from a copper substrate using Q-switched Nd:YAG radiation at 1064 nm, 532 nm and 266 nm. Appl. Surf. Sci. 127–129, 773–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00741-1 (1998).
Buccolieri, G., Nassisi, V., Buccolieri, A., Vona, F. & Castellano, A. Laser cleaning of a bronze bell. Appl. Surf. Sci. 272, 55–58 (2013).
Radojković, B., Ristić, S., Polić, S., Jančić-Heinemann, R. & Radovanović, D. Preliminary investigation on the use of the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser to clean corrosion products on museum embroidered textiles with metallic yarns. J. Cult. Herit. 23, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CULHER.2016.07.001 (2017).
Ersoy, T., Tunay, T., Uǧuryol, M., Mavili, G. & Akturk, S. Femtosecond laser cleaning of historical paper with sizing. J. Cult. Herit. 15(3), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CULHER.2013.07.002 (2014).
Siano, S., Pini, R. & Salimbeni, R. Coated bronze cleaning by Nd:YAG lasers. Laser Tech. Syst. Art Conserv. 4402, 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.445673 (2001).
Ye, Y. et al. Laser plasma shockwave cleaning of SiO2 particles on gold film. Opt. Lasers Eng. 49(4), 536–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTLASENG.2010.12.006 (2011).
Cottam, C. A. & Emmony, D. C. TEA–CO2 laser surface processing of corroded metals. Corros. Sci. 41(8), 1529–1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(98)00202-9 (1999).
Striova, J. et al. Optical devices provide unprecedented insights into the laser cleaning of calcium oxalate layers. Microchem. J. 124, 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICROC.2015.09.005 (2016).
Márton, Z. et al. Holographic testing of possible mechanical effects of laser cleaning on the structure of model fresco samples. NDT E Int. 63, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NDTEINT.2014.01.007 (2014).
Ochocińska, K., Kamińska, A. & Śliwiński, G. Experimental investigations of stained paper documents cleaned by the Nd:YAG laser pulses. J. Cult. Herit. 4, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01197-4 (2003).
Kolar, J. et al. Laser cleaning of paper using Nd:YAG laser running at 532 nm. J. Cult. Herit. 4, 185–187 (2003).
Uccello, A., Maffini, A., Dellasega, D. & Passoni, M. Laser cleaning of pulsed laser deposited rhodium films for fusion diagnostic mirrors. Fusion Eng. Des. 88(6–8), 1347–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUSENGDES.2013.01.036 (2013).
Kumar, A. et al. Laser shock cleaning of radioactive particulates from glass surface. Opt. Lasers Eng. 57, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTLASENG.2014.01.013 (2014).
Römich, H., Dickmann, K., Mottner, P., Hildenhagen, J. & Müller, E. Laser cleaning of stained glass windows—Final results of a research project. J. Cult. Herit. 4, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01187-1 (2003).
Ueda, M., Makino, R., Ichiro Kagawa, K. & Ichi Nishiyama, B. Laser cleaning of glass. Opt. Lasers Eng. 15(4), 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-8166(91)90065-2 (1991).
Kim, J. H., Suh, Y. J. & Kim, S. S. Enhanced cleaning of photoresist film on a transparent substrate by backward irradiation of a Nd:YAG laser. Appl. Surf. Sci. 253(4), 1843–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2006.03.024 (2006).
Ye, Y., Yuan, X., Xiang, X., Cheng, X. & Miao, X. Laser cleaning of particle and grease contaminations on the surface of optics. Optik (Stuttg.) 123(12), 1056–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJLEO.2011.07.030 (2012).
Bartoli, L., Pouli, P., Fotakis, C., Siano, S. & Salimbeni, R. Characterization of stone cleaning by Nd:YAG lasers with different pulse duration. Laser Chem. 2006, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2006/81750 (2006).
Siano, S. et al. Laser cleaning of stone by different laser pulse duration and wavelength. Laser Phys. 18(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1054660x08010064 (2008).
Staicu, A. et al. Minimal invasive control of paintings cleaning by LIBS. Opt. Laser Technol. 77, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTLASTEC.2015.09.010 (2016).
Kumar, A. et al. Laser cleaning of tungsten ribbon. Appl. Surf. Sci. 308, 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2014.04.138 (2014).
Di Francia, E. et al. Novel procedure for studying laser-surface material interactions during scanning laser ablation cleaning processes on Cu-based alloys. Appl. Surf. Sci. 544(2020), 148820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148820 (2021).
Senesi, G. S., Manzini, D. & De Pascale, O. Application of a laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy handheld instrument to the diagnostic analysis of stone monuments. Appl. Geochem. 96, 87–91 (2018).
Klein, S., Hildenhagen, J., Dickmann, K., Stratoudaki, T. & Zafiropulos, V. LIBS-spectroscopy for monitoring and control of the laser cleaning process of stone and medieval glass. J. Cult. Herit. 1(2), S287–S292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(00)00173-4 (2000).
Bude, J. et al. Particle damage sources for fused silica optics and their mitigation on high energy laser systems. Opt. Express 25(10), 11414–11435. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.011414 (2017).
Kafka, K. R. P. & Demos, S. G. Interaction of short laser pulses with model contamination microparticles on a high reflector. Opt. Lett. 44(7), 1844–1847. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.001844 (2019).
Mann, K., Wolff-Rottke, B. & Müller, F. Cleaning of optical surfaces by excimer laser radiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 96–98, 463–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(95)00459-9 (1996).
Djotyan, G. P. et al. Real-time interferometric diagnostics of rubidium plasma. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 884, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2017.12.004 (2018).
Becke, A. D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 38(6), 3098–3100. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 (1988).
Lee, C., Yang, W. & Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 37(2), 785–789. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 (1988).
Frisch, D. J. F. M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.02 (Gaussian Inc., 2009).
Hay, P. J. & Wadt, W. R. Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for K to Au including the outermost core orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 82(1), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448975 (1985).
Holomb, R., Mitsa, V., Johanssonand, P. & Veres, M. Boson peak in low-frequency Raman spectra of AsxS 100–x glasses: Nanocluster contribution. Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. 7(3–4), 885–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200982829 (2010).
Kondrat, O. et al. Ab initio calculations and the effect of atomic substitution in the Raman spectra of As(Sb, Bi)2S3 films. Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. 7(3–4), 893–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200982831 (2010).
Gádoros, P. et al. Comparative analysis of lithiated silica glasses by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 553, 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120472 (2021).
Kamitsos, E. I., Yiannopoulos, Y. D., Karakassides, M. A., Chryssikos, G. D. & Jain, H. Raman and infrared structural investigation of xRb2O·(1–x)GeO2 glasses. J. Phys. Chem. 100(28), 11755–11765. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp960434+ (1996).
Matson, D. W., Sharma, S. K. & Philpotts, J. A. The structure of high-silica alkali-silicate glasses. A Raman spectroscopic investigation. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 58, 323–352 (1983).
Accessed 8 Sept 2022. https://rruff.info/Tridymite/R090042.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund of Hungary under Grant TKP2021-NVA-02.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Budapest University of Technology and Economics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.G. did the laser cleaning and its evaluation, A.C. conceptualized the study, A.N and M.V. measured the Raman spectra and evaluated the data, R.H. did the DFT simulation and data analysis, L.K. gave technical advice for the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gádoros, P., Czitrovszky, A., Nagy, A. et al. Laser cleaning and Raman analysis of the contamination on the optical window of a rubidium vapor cell. Sci Rep 12, 15530 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19645-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19645-z










