Table 1 Top: Mean SRTs and standard deviation for the five listening conditions with co-located or spatially separated maskers.

From: Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users

Masker configuration

Bimodal clinical

Bimodal adapted

Bimodal match

BiEAS

low

BiEAS

high

Co-located

9.25 ± 0.74

5.49 ± 0.43

5.36 ± 0.34

4.89 ± 0.55

5.06 ± 0.42

Spatially separated

9.83 ± 0.58

5.75 ± 0.42

7.95 ± 0.39

5.28 ± 0.35

− 0.51 ± 0.94

ANOVA

dF, res

F

p

ηp2

Post-hoc pairwise comparisons

Condition

4, 44

63.2

 < 0.001*

0.85

BC >>> BM > BA, BL >>> BH

Spatial

1,44

1.5

0.250

0.12

 

Condition × spatial

4, 44

27.2

 < 0.001*

0.71

BM: Spatially separated >>> Co-located

BH: Co-located >>> Spatially separated

Co-located: BC >> BA, BM, BL, BH

Spatially separated: BC, BM >> BA, BL >>> BH

  1. Bottom: Results of RM ANOVA on SRT data. Significant effects are indicated by italics and asterisks. Significant differences for Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons are shown at right (> = p < 0.05; >>  = p < 0.01; >>>  = p <  0.001).
  2. SRT, speech recognition threshold; BC, bimodal clinical; BA, bimodal adapted; BM, bimodal match; BL, BiEAS low; BH, BiEAS high.
Back to article page