Table 5 Relationship between LDL-C/HDL-C ratio and AF in different sensitivity analyses.

Exposure	Model I (OR, 95%CI, P)	Model II (OR, 95%CI, P)	Model III (OR, 95%CI, P)	Model IV (OR, 95%CI, P)
LDL-C/HDL-C ratio	0.392 (0.251, 0.613) 0.00004	0.252 (0.144, 0.442) < 0.00001	0.407 (0.256, 0.647) 0.00015	0.424 (0.271, 0.661) 0.00015
LDL-C/HDL-C ratio (quartile)
Q1	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Q2	0.803 (0.563, 1.147) 0.22809	0.746 (0.498, 1.117) 0.15427	0.812 (0.562, 1.173) 0.26624	0.768 (0.533, 1.108) 0.15776
Q3	0.641 (0.437, 0.940) 0.02285	0.540 (0.346, 0.841) 0.00642	0.624 (0.418, 0.932) 0.02115	0.689 (0.471, 1.007) 0.05429
Q4	0.425 (0.279, 0.646) 0.00006	0.303 (0.178, 0.516) 0.00001	0.444 (0.287, 0.686) 0.00025	0.449 (0.296, 0.682) 0.00017
P for trend	0.00003	< 0.00001	0.00009	0.00015

Model I was sensitivity analysis in participants without the patients with the history of PAD. We adjusted age, gender, WC, education, history of alcohol intake, smoking, DM, hypertension, MI, DBP, SBP, CRP, proteinuria, TG, eGFR.
Model II was sensitivity analysis in participants without the patients with the history of hypertension. We adjusted age, gender, WC, education, history of alcohol intake, smoking, DM, MI, PAD, DBP, SBP, CRP, proteinuria, TG, eGFR.
Model III was sensitivity analysis in participants without the patients with the history of DM. We adjusted age, gender, WC, education, history of alcohol intake, smoking, hypertension, MI, PAD, DBP, SBP, CRP, proteinuria, TG, eGFR.
Model IV was sensitivity analysis in participants without the patients with the history of MI. We adjusted age, gender, WC, education, history of alcohol intake, smoking, DM, hypertension, PAD, DBP, SBP, CRP, proteinuria, TG, eGFR.
OR odds ratios; CI confidence, Ref reference; LDL-C/HDL-C ratio low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.

Quick links

Search