Table 2 Item-level descriptive statistics, inter-item correlations, factor loadings, and item correlations with T1 enactment intentions (n = 5,014).
From: Development and validation of the Perceived Effectiveness of Nutrition Messages Scale
Please indicate the extent to which you agree/disagree that this healthy diet message… | Mean (SD) | Skew | Kurt | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Loadings(1) | Loadings(2) | r |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1–effect perceptions | ||||||||||||
1. …Makes me stop and think about my diet | 3.62 (0.95) | −0.68 | 0.17 | – | .51*** | .62*** | .54*** | .29*** | .42*** | .76 | .05 | .32*** |
2. …Is personally relevant | 3.77 (0.95) | −0.82 | 0.54 | – | .57*** | .43*** | .39*** | .54*** | .46 | .37 | .38*** | |
3. …Motivates me to improve my diet | 3.70 (0.95) | −0.69 | 0.24 | – | .51*** | .35*** | .50*** | .67 | .20 | .42*** | ||
4. …Makes me feel concerned about my diet | 3.30 (1.08) | −0.24 | −0.71 | – | .16*** | .28*** | .76 | −.13 | .19*** | |||
Factor 2–message perceptions | ||||||||||||
5. …Is easy to understand | 4.23 (0.69) | −1.05 | 2.75 | – | .55*** | −.04 | .69 | .29*** | ||||
6. …Is believable | 4.05 (0.80) | −0.98 | 1.54 | – | .09 | .78 | .41*** | |||||
