Table 2 Comparison of the proposed harvester E-HE with other published work.
References | Dimension of the unit cell | Substrate used | Frequency (GHz) | Measured energy harvesting efficiency η (%) | Cost | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.32 λ0 | FR4 | 3.06,3.9, and 5.97 | 94.4 and 84 | High | Simple | |
0.13 λ0 | F4B | 2.5 | 90 | Medium | Simple | |
0.08 λ0 | Rogers RT/duroid 6006 | 2.45 and 6 | 90 and 85 | Medium | Medium | |
0.123 λ0 | Rogers TMM10 | 2.45 | 96.5 | Medium | Simple | |
0.22 λ0 | Rogers RO4350B | 5.54 | 91 | Medium | Simple | |
0.13 λ0 | Rogers 3210 | 2.4, and 5.8 | 58 and 51 | Medium | Medium | |
0.3 λ0 | Rogers RO4350 | 5.8 | 93.1 | High | Complex | |
0.56 λ0 | RT/duroid 5880 Rogers | 2.4 | 70 | High | Simple | |
0.32 λ0 | None | 5.8 | 88 | Medium | Complex | |
0.6 λ0 | Rogers RO4003C | 2.45 | 61 | Medium | Simple | |
0.15 λ0 | Rogers 4003C | 2.66, 5.40, 6.298 | None | Medium | Medium | |
0.16 λ0 | PTFE | 2.45 | 97.3 | High | Medium | |
0.13 λ0 | Rogers RO3010 | 5.33 | 86 | Low | Complex | |
0.11 λ0 | Rogers RO4003C | 5.5 and 7.2 | None | Low | Medium | |
This work | 0.12 λ0 | Rogers RT 5880 | 3.7, 6.3, 9.9, and 14.2 | 95.3, 96.5, 95, and 95.2 | Low | Simple |
