Table 5 The potential distribution area of the Fritillaria przewalskii species in the 2050s and 2090s.

From: Investigating the distributional response of the rare and endangered plant Fritillaria przewalskii to climate change based on optimized MaxEnt model

Species

Model

Period

Area of each suitable region (× 104 Km2)

Unsuitable region

Unchanged region

Expansion region

Contraction region

Fritillaria przewalskii

BCC-CSM2-MR

Current vs. SSP1-2.6–2050 s

896.66

32.76

7.32

4.61

Current vs. SSP2-4.5–2050 s

897.43

31.83

6.55

5.54

Current vs. SSP3-7.0–2050 s

897.58

32.76

6.40

4.61

Current vs. SSP5-8.5–2050 s

897.98

33.78

4.07

5.48

Current vs. SSP1-2.6–2090 s

898.85

32.61

5.13

4.76

Current vs. SSP2-4.5–2090 s

899.91

31.89

6.00

3.60

Current vs. SSP3-7.0–2090 s

896.75

32.10

7.23

5.27

Current vs. SSP5-8.5–2090 s

899.61

29.87

4.37

7.50

BCC-CSM1.1

Current vs. RCP2.6–2050 s

882.46

48.46

5.19

4.53

Current vs. RCP4.5–2050 s

884.02

47.77

2.84

6.62

Current vs. RCP6.0–2050 s

881.67

49.86

4.40

5.94

Current vs. RCP8.5–2050 s

883.05

47.82

3.80

6.57

Current vs. RCP2.6–2090 s

883.05

47.82

3.81

6.58

Current vs. RCP4.5–2090 s

883.50

44.37

3.36

10.02

Current vs. RCP6.0–2090 s

883.71

47.90

3.15

6.49

Current vs. RCP8.5–2090 s

883.50

45.89

3.37

8.50

MIROC

Current vs. RCP2.6–2050 s

882.80

47.60

5.19

4.53

Current vs. RCP4.5–2050 s

883.38

47.61

3.48

6.79

Current vs. RCP6.0–2050 s

881.67

49.86

4.06

6.79

Current vs. RCP8.5–2050 s

884.06

45.68

2.79

8.71

Current vs. RCP2.6–2090 s

881.21

47.83

5.64

6.56

Current vs. RCP4.5–2090 s

883.58

46.50

3.28

7.90

Current vs. RCP6.0–2090 s

883.18

45.02

3.68

9.37

Current vs. RCP8.5–2090 s

883.97

47.32

2.89

7.08