Table 2 Logistic regression analysis on the association between DII and myopia.

From: Association between dietary inflammatory index and adolescent myopia based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

 

Model 1

Model 2−1

Model 2–2

Model 3

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

DII

1.03 (1.00, 1.06)

0.040

1.02 (0.99, 1.05)

0.120

1.03 (1.00, 1.06)

0.020

1.02 (0.99, 1.05)

0.170

Quartile 1

Reference

-

Reference

-

Reference

-

Reference

-

Quartile 2

1.09 (0.96, 1.25)

0.160

1.08 (0.94, 1.23)

0.247

1.09 (0.96, 1.23)

0.160

1.07 (0.93, 1.22)

0.300

Quartile 3

1.12 (0.98, 1.28)

0.070

1.09 (0.95, 1.25)

0.180

1.12 (0.98, 1.28)

0.070

1.08 (0.95, 1.24)

0.220

Quartile 4

1.13 (1.00, 1.29)

0.040

1.12 (0.97, 1.27)

0.118

1.15 (1.01, 1.32)

0.020

1.10 (0.96, 1.26)

0.150

P for trend

-

0.040

-

0.120

-

0.020

-

0.150

  1. Model 1, no covariates were adjusted. Model 2 was a minimally adjusted model in which age and gender were first introduced (Model 2−1), and then age, gender, PIR, education level (Model 2–2). Model 3, age, PIR, education levels, gender, race and BMI were adjusted. BMI, body mass index; DII, dietary inflammatory index; PIR, poverty income ratio; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Back to article page