Table 2 The evaluation results of nine evaluation metrics for example fused image.

From: A new generative method for multi-focus image fusion of underwater micro bubbles

Methods

EN \(\uparrow\)

MI \(\uparrow\)

NMI \(\uparrow\)

PSNR\(\uparrow\)

AG \(\uparrow\)

\(Q^{AB/F}\) \(\uparrow\)

SD\(\uparrow\)

EI\(\uparrow\)

SSIM \(\uparrow\)

LP14

2.3432

1.4576

4.6200

85.8374

0.2760

0.5580

5.6606

1.4180

0.9317

CVT38

2.4101

1.5210

4.5994

85.9928

0.2589

0.4643

5.3800

1.3359

0.9377

DT-CWT39

2.4109

1.5502

4.6094

85.9805

0.2704

0.51.1

5.3797

1.3408

0.9386

GF40

2.8099

1.6891

4.2903

86.2876

0.3213

0.6313

5.5037

1.5879

0.9451

IMF40

2.8504

1.8573

4.2958

85.3845

0.3223

0.5571

5.8951

1.6064

0.9402

MWG41

2.8405

2.0561

4.3303

85.1855

0.3114

0.6328

6.0263

1.5293

0.9368

CNN42

2.4178

1.6969

4.6447

85.3974

0.2653

0.5813

5.2894

1.3730

0.9368

Deep fuse43

2.3443

1.4981

11.1232

69.1082

0.2274

0.3186

3.2699

1.2060

0.1541

MUFusion44

2.5962

1.5792

4.4346

86.0436

0.1828

0.2859

5.6025

1.1259

0.9335

SESF45

2.6406

1.4422

4.3243

85.0725

0.3712

0.5700

5.9045

1.7695

0.9300

SwinFusion46

1.0249

0.6052

6.0470

85.3044

0.1386

0.2850

5.0804

0.5869

0.8140

ZMFF47

0.2853

1.4790

4.6581

84.9849

0.1769

0.3655

6.1039

1.0966

0.9172

FusionDiff11

2.4866

1.0305

3.9864

82.7706

0.2742

0.4484

6.2695

1.4707

0.8995

RCFusion

2.5625

1.6412

4.4319

84.9812

0.2021

0.3760

6.5761

1.2187

0.9315

  1. The highest and second highest scores are highlighted in bold and italic, respectively.