Introduction

Synthesis of nanoparticles (NPs) through green synthesis is an environmentally friendly and sustainable approach compared to the conventional chemical synthesis method1,2. It involves the utilization of natural resources such as organic systems and ideal solvent systems to avoid the production of unwanted or harmful by-products3. Bacteria, fungi, algae, and plant extracts can be used as reducing agents in the green synthesis of metal nanoparticles3,4. The use of microorganisms and plants to synthesize nanoparticles is called biosynthesis5,6. The advantages of green synthesis of nanoparticles include lower cost, decreased pollution, and overall, improved environmental conditions7. The process of green synthesis of nanoparticles involves the bio-reduction of metal ions into their elemental form in the size range of nanoparticles8. Synthesis of nanomaterial through this approach is an environment-friendly method that proves to be just as efficient if not more compared to other conventional synthesis techniques9,10. Choosing which microorganisms to use in creating nanoparticles involves considering factors, like the type of metal ions utilized the preferred size and shape of the nanoparticles, and the intended purpose of these nanoparticles11,12. Because bacteria are able to produce nanoparticles of different sizes, shapes, and morphologies, they are commonly used in the synthesis of nanoparticles. The application of bacteria provides several benefits, such as easy handling of growing conditions, rapid multiplication, and profitability13,14.

Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles rank as the most prevalent metal oxide following iron. They are cost-effective, safe, and simple to produce. These nanoparticles find utility, in sectors, like rubber manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, petroleum extraction, textiles, biosensors, cosmetics, and more. Biosynthesized ZnO nanoparticles exhibit enhanced surface characteristics compared to those synthesized chemically making them ideal, for applications like reducing tension, between oil and water15,16. Tripathi et al. reported that zinc oxide nanoparticles can be formed through enzymes secreted by Bacillus licheniformis bacteria cells. In their studies, they used zinc acetate as a precursor salt. Zinc acetate and sodium bicarbonate react and form Zn(OH)2, which is thermally destroyed and forms ZnO nuclei. Then the enzymes produced by bacteria produce zinc oxide nanoparticles17. Selvarajaran et al. used the bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum and the zinc sulfate precursor salt to produce nanoparticles of zinc oxide. They succeeded in the biological production of nanoparticles with a size of 13 nm and a spherical shape. They stated that in addition to the enzyme produced by bacteria, electro-kinetic potential and pH play an important role in the production of nanoparticles18. Libin et al. investigated the biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Tinospora cordifolia stem extract. In their reports, they discussed the effect of green synthesis of nanoparticles in reducing environmental problems and introduced the production of nanoparticles from this method as very important and effective. The produced nanoparticles with an average size of 47 to 87 nm were identified in the FESEM test, and according to the EDS test, 60% of the produced nanoparticles were reported to be zinc. In their research, they also studied the significant effects of biologically synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles, in their anti-fungal and anti-bacterial properties19. Shanmugam et al. investigated the synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus fermentum) as the reducing and capping agent. AFM analysis revealed that the nanoparticles’ size was about 90–100 nm. In their study, the maximum concentration, 20 m Molar of ZnO NPs, showed the highest antimicrobial activity. These observations indicate that the synthesized ZnO NPs possess remarkable antimicrobial potency20. Green nanocomposites based on eucalyptus and walnut shells significantly enhance oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs by improving wettability and interfacial tension reduction under varying saline conditions, offering a stable, and efficient alternative for EOR applications21​. Oil and gas industries have found that nanoparticles are the most viable solution for Enhanced oil recovery due to their characteristics. Oil recovery rates have been improved through the use of various types of nanoparticles in the conducted studies. The utlized nanoparticles are oxides of metals, such as nickel oxide, Zinc oxide, Aluminium Oxide etc. Altering viscosity, density, interfacial tension and the wettability of the reservoir (generally from oil-wet to water-wet reservoir) are some of the nanoparticle oil recovery mechanisms22,23,24,25,26,27. Ahmadi et al., synthesized a novel ZnO–TiO2/ZSM-5 nanocomposite (ZTZ) for EOR in sandstone formations. The ZTZ outperformed the standalone ZSM-5 by improving stability, wettability, and IFT at reservoir conditions. ZTZ optimized capillary force alteration, which promoted oil detachment and accelerated production. At an ideal concentration, ZTZ achieved 9% higher oil recovery than ZSM-5 alone, establishing its efficiency as an EOR agent in sandstone reservoirs28. Leshari et al. compared the effect of several nanoparticles on the Enhanced oil recovery in reservoirs. They stated that zinc oxide nanoparticles can reduce the interfacial tension by 3 × 10− 5 N/cm and increase oil recovery by 8%. The analyzed oil sample was from the Tapis oil field in Malaysia29. Ahmadi et al. investigated the application of cerium-modified ZnO nanocomposites to enhance oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs. By modifying ZnO with cerium, the nanocomposites demonstrated increased pore volume, stability, improved IFT, and CA reduction. Optimal concentration testing (100 ppm) at reservoir conditions (60 °C and 1800 Psi) showed that ZnO-Ce nanocomposites significantly enhanced the recovery factor from 37.11% (for unmodified ZnO) to 71.40%30​. Another study investigated activated carbon–ZnO nanocomposites (AC/ZnO) for EOR in sandstone reservoirs. At 80 °C and 2500 Psi, various concentrations (30 to 180 ppm) were tested for wettability alteration, interfacial tension, and zeta potential, and 90 ppm was found to be optimal for both AC/ZnO and pure ZnO. AC/ZnO demonstrated superior performance, reducing the contact angle from 56.27° to 39.14° and increasing ZP from − 37.79 to − 42.06 mV. In oil recovery tests after 15 days, recovery factors were 38.38% for the base case, 51.79% for ZnO, and 66.68% for AC/ZnO, highlighting AC/ZnO’s effectiveness in improving oil recovery31. Soleimani et al. investigated the performance of zinc oxide nanoparticles in reducing the interfacial tension between water and oil,َaltering the wettability of the reservoir rock, and finally enhancing the oil recovery. At 0.3 wt% of ZnO nanoparticles, the results reveal a maximum surface tension of 35.57 mN/m. It was discovered that the nanofluid with the highest surface tension (0.3 wt%) had a higher recovery efficiency. The reduction of oil/water interfacial tension and alteration of wettability is the main cause for the highest recovery factor of 11.82% at 0.3 wt%32.

In the current study zinc oxide was employed to synthesize nanoparticles using Enterobacter cloacae (PTCC: 1798) microorganism as a novel approach. For this purpose, this microorganism was extracted from the formation water of an oil field in the southwest of Iran. Plus, characterization tests such as; FTIR, FESEM, XRD, EDS, and DLS were carried out in order to identify and validate the characteristics of the synthesized nanoparticles. In the next step, the effectiveness of the base fluids, namely deionized water, seawater, and twice diluted seawater was explored and the role of ions was assessed. Then, the stability of nanofluids was tested by zeta potential and UV-vis spectrophotometer to optimize the concentration of nanofluids in several ranges (100, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppm). After that, the efficiency of the prepared nanofluids in absorption and rock wettability alteration was evaluated by interfacial tension and contact angle tests. Eventually, the oil recovery factor analysis was investigated through displacement tests inside a transparent 2-D micromodel as a microscopic scale to understand mechanisms by flow patterns.

Materials and methods

Microorganism and its growth conditions

In selecting the type of bacteria, the most crucial characteristic that should be considered is its ability to produce nanoparticles and the investigation of its performance in enhanced oil recovery. As such, Enterobacter cloacae microorganism with the PTCC: 1798 was selected for this research. This microorganism was isolated from the formation water of an oil field in the southwest of Iran. Figure 1 shows the microscopic image of the isolated bacteria. The specific growth medium for the desired microorganism is comprised of peptone (Merck. CAS number: 91079–38 − 8), meat extract (Merck. CAS Number: 68990–09 − 0), and MnSO4 H2O salt (Merck. CAS number: 10034–96 − 5). In the growth medium, the bacteria were inseminated and then they were put in a shaker incubator (Wise, 20 R; Korea) at a temperature of 37 °C and the rotational speed of 135 rpm for 8 h.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Microscopic image of the isolated bacteria.

Utilized fluids

The oil for research is supplied from one of the reservoirs (southwest of Iran), with a viscosity of 540 centipoise and an API of 22. Furthermore, the SARA test results of crude oil have been tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1 Results of SARA analysis.

Deionized water was used in the synthesis phase of nanoparticles. Deionized water and Persian Gulf seawater (Cl: 23000, SO42−: 3350, HCO3−: 166, Mg2+: 2996, Ca2−: 267, Na+: 11750, K+: 499, Fe2+: 0.42, Sr2+: 3.4, TDS: 40270 ppm) were used in the interfacial tension, contact angle, and flooding tests in the micromodel.

Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and its identification tests

After the cultivation of the Enterobacter cloacae microorganism with the PTCC: 1798 and their complete growth inside the incubator, the solution is centrifuged, and the solid components are separated and washed four times using deionized water. After that, it is added to 100 cc of deionized water and placed on a magnetic stirrer. Then, 20 cc of zinc acetate precursor salt (Merck. CAS Number: 5970-45-6) solution with 0.5 molar concentration is placed in the incubator for 24 h. After 24 h, the solution is placed in a centrifuge for 10 min (8000 rpm) at 4 °C and washed multiple times with deionized water and ethanol. After the following steps, the substance is placed in an oven (100 °C) for drying purposes. And finally, it is placed in a furnace/oven for 6 h at 400 °C with a 5 °C/min heat rate. Figure 2 shows the schematic of the biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic of biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles.

To verify the successful synthesis of the nanoparticles, various analytical methods were applied. X-ray diffraction (MPD XPert, Netherlands) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (PerkinElmer-Frontier, USA) were used to assess the nanoparticles’ composition. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FEI NOVA NanoSEM 450, USA) characterized the size and morphology of the ZnO NPs, while dynamic light scattering (Nanotrac Wave-Microtrac, USA) measured particle size distribution in solution. Additionally, Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (VEGA3, TESCAN, France) provided elemental and chemical analysis. Finally, the zeta potential test (Nanotrac Wave-Microtrac, USA) was carried out to stability assessment.

Measurement of interfacial tension

In this research, in order to measure the interfacial tension between oil and fluids, the Tensiometer device (KRUSS K11, Germany) and the ring method have been used. For this purpose, the ring was positioned just below the interface between the two immiscible liquids, then the ring slowly lifted through the interface using the tensiometer. As the ring moved upward, the lower-phase liquid adhered to it, creating a meniscus. Lifting until the force required to reach a maximum value was achieved, just before the liquid film broke. This peak force was recorded, and the tensiometer calculated the IFT, using a correction factor to account for the ring’s dimensions. For accuracy, the measurement was repeated three times, and the mean value was reported.

Porous media

In order to apply reservoir conditions to the tests, a glass micromodel designed after a dolomite rock sample was used as the porous media. The schematics of the utilized micromodel are shown in Fig. 3. Table 2 shows the specifications of the micromodel.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic of the dolomite micromodel.

Table 2 Specification of the micromodel.

The method for preparing and flooding the micromodel is as follows. Firstly, the micromodel is washed with water, toluene, and methanol. Afterward, it is dried using a vacuum pump and is soaked in a 0.5 molar sodium hydroxide solution for one hour so that it becomes oil-wet. Thereafter, the micromodel is washed with distilled water and dried in an oven at 200 C for 15 min, after which the micromodel is soaked in a 2% volume solution of Trimethylchlorosilane for 5 min. After washing the micromodel with methanol to remove the excess silane, it is placed in an oven at 100 °C for an hour and vacuumed again. During the flooding operation, oil is injected into the micromodel at a rate of 0.07 ml/h. The solutions are injected into the porous media up to one pore volume. To calculate the recovery factor, the micromodel is photographed at one-minute intervals, and the amount of oil recovery is determined by analyzing these images.

Preparing thin sections of carbonate rocks for wettability experiments

Thin sections from carbonate rocks are prepared from the rock samples, with a thickness of 2 mm and a diameter of 1.5 in. To remove organic and inorganic materials from the rock surfaces.

The thin sections were washed with toluene, methanol, and formation water for 10, 3, and 2 days respectively. In the next step, the thin sections are placed in containers with the desired oil sample for 30 days at 75° C in an oven to become oil-wet and ready for the experiments.

Wettability alteration test

Wettability refers to the tendency of a liquid to contact a solid surface coated with another fluid (gas or liquid), which is mainly due to the existing intermolecular forces. The angle that a liquid droplet creates with a solid surface is called the contact angle, which is crucial in determining wettability. In this study, the sessile drop method was used to measure the contact angle. The schematic of the contact angle measurement device is shown in Fig. 4. Glass slides used in the micro-model construction were cut into smaller dimensions and grooves were made on them using a drill to resemble the porous media. In the next step, the glass slides were made oil-wet using the method mentioned in previous sections. To conduct the experiments, the glass slides were placed in the desired solutions for 4 h, and the contact angle of the oil was measured in each state. Each measurement was repeated three times, and their average was reported to minimize errors.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Schematic of the Wettability alteration test’s device.

To measure the contact angle with the rock, the desired samples are prepared from the core using the method described above and made oil-wet before measuring the contact angle. Of course, before becoming oil-wet, the samples are made water-wet by being placed in formation water, and the contact angle is measured on these samples as the initial wettability of the rock (θi). After becoming oil-wet, the thin sections’ contact angles are measured, and considered as the original wettability of the rock (θo). In the final step, after placing the rock samples in the desired nanofluid solutions, the contact angle is once again measured and considered as the final wettability of the rock (θf). Thereby, the wettability index is calculated using the following formula.

$$\:{WA}_{Index}=\frac{{\theta\:}_{o}-{\theta\:}_{f}}{{\theta\:}_{o}-{\theta\:}_{i}}$$
(1)

As the wettability index approaches one, it indicates a greater change in wettability, and as it approaches zero, it indicates no change in wettability.

Result and discussion

Identification of the biological nanoparticle

The results of the FTIR test for the produced nanoparticle from the precursor salt of zinc acetate are demonstrated in Fig. 5. The peaks at 1651 and 3304 correspond to the stretching and bending vibrations of the OH group and can be indicative of the physical absorption of water on the surface of the nanoparticle. Furthermore, the peak at 2353 corresponds to the stretching bond of C = O and the peak at 1312 corresponds to the bending bond C–H which is abundant in precursor salt of zinc acetate. Lastly, the peak at 953 corresponds to Zn–OH, and the main peak at 463 corresponds to the Zn–O bond33,34.

Fig. 5
figure 5

FTIR spectrum for synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticle.

The XRD test results of the solid powder produced from the precursor salt of zinc acetate are illustrated in Fig. 6. As is shown, the peaks at the (2θ), 31, 36, 56, and 68 positions are indicative of zinc material presence35,36. The initial large peak indicates the amorphous nature of the product, which is due to the production of the intracellular nanoparticles underlying the bacterial biomass. As such, DLS, FESEM, and EDS tests are performed to identify the size of the produced biological Nano-particles and to analyze their elemental and imaging properties.

Fig. 6
figure 6

XRD pattern for synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticle.

Figure 7a shows the DLS test results, applied to accurately measure the size of the nano-particles. This test is one of the most crucial tests for identifying the size distribution of nano-particles, revealing the hydrodynamic size of the particles. As is observed, most of the zinc oxide particles synthesized by the precursor salt of zinc acetate on the peak of 48 nm (the highest density in the range of 30 to 70 nm), and the polydispersity index, a parameter representing the size distribution of particles, is 0.342. The closer the value of the polydispersity index is to one, the size distribution of the particles is in a wider range. The produced zinc oxide nanoparticles are smaller than the pore size in the micromodel. Therefore, these particles will not block the flow path during the micromodel injection test. The elemental analysis results using EDS for the biological Nano-particle produced by the precursor salt of zinc and the percentages for each element are illustrated in Fig. 7b. The scarcity of the carbon elements, as portrayed in Fig. 7b, indicates that the precursor has thoroughly reacted with the solution obtained from the target bacteria, providing the conditions to produce Zinc oxide. The presence of a small amount of carbon is normal since the main substrate of the solution is organic and includes carbon-hydrogen and carbon-oxygen bonds. The weight percentages of zinc, oxygen, and carbon elements in the product are 51.52%, 36.04%, and 12.44%, respectively.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticle, (a) DLS analysis. (b) EDS spectra.

The FESEM test is implemented to examine the morphology of the particles present on the surface under investigation. Due to their small size, nanoparticles appear as a mass on the surface, and consequently, particle size obtained from FESEM is usually not accurate, and the displayed sizes are often exaggerated. Figure 8 shows FESEM images of biological zinc oxide nanoparticles produced by the acetate of zinc precursor salt. These images indicate the formation of nanoparticles in the range of 32–58 nm. Therefore, the size distribution of the synthesized nanoparticles in the FESEM test is in accordance with the results obtained from the DLS test and confirms this issue.

Fig. 8
figure 8

FESEM image for synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticle.

Investigation of the biological zinc oxide nanoparticle’s stability

A high degree of stability for nano-fluids is required to inject them into the porous media without losing their properties. In this section, the stability of solutions containing biological zinc oxide nano-particles with concentrations of 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppm have been investigated. As shown in Fig. 9, produced zinc oxide nano-particles from the zinc acetate precursor salt have relatively good stability, and their precipitation occurs after 24 h at a concentration of 2000 ppm. However, at 100, 500, and 1000 ppm, the solution stability is maintained after 24 h, and no precipitation is observed. The instability of nano-fluids can lead to the accumulation of nanoparticles in the porous media and blockage of the existing flow paths, ultimately reducing the amount of oil recovery. Figure 13a quantitatively examines the stability of zinc oxide nanoparticles produced from the zinc acetate precursor salt. As shown in the graph, it is clear that the amount of light absorption remains almost constant at 100, 500, and 1000 ppm after 24 h, and no significant changes are observed. This indicates the stability of the nanofluid at these concentrations of biological zinc oxide nanoparticles. Plus, the zeta potential (ZP) experiment also demonstrated this result. The nanofluid indicated − 36 mV ZP during the experiment (Fig. 10). This range of results illustrates that the prepared nanofluid has good stability, displaying no sedimentation of the nanoparticles and suggesting the prepared nanofluid is a good candidate for EOR applications in the long term37. However, the amount of light absorption decreases at 2000 ppm after 12 h, indicating instability and precipitation of the nanofluid.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Stability of synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticle in water (a) After 12 h, (b) After 24 h.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Zeta potential of synthesized ZnO nanoparticle.

Investigation of the effect of ions concentration in the base fluid on the stability of biological zinc oxide nanoparticles

One of the most critical parameters affecting the stability of nanofluids is the amount and concentration of salt ions in the base fluid. To investigate this parameter, Nanofluids at 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppm of biological zinc oxide nanoparticle concentrations were prepared in seawater and twice diluted seawater, and their stability was qualitatively and quantitatively examined. As illustrated in Fig. 11, the stability of nanoparticles over time at various intervals (12 and 24 h) was observed. This time evaluation is essential for understanding the flocculation and sedimentation. The observed stability across both time points at all concentrations, followed by sedimentation at higher concentrations (1000 and 2000 ppm), recommends an operation of time-dependent destabilization. This effect can be attributed to van der Waals attractions, which act at short distances and tend to draw particles together38. As the nanoparticle concentration upgraded, particles got closer to each other, thereby raising the attractive forces that overcome their interactions. A net attractive force that causes clump and sedimentation is the reason for balance shifts in concentrations above 1000 ppm.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Stability of synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticle in seawater (a) After 12 h, (b) After 24 h.

Additionally, Fig. 12 shows the stability of biological zinc oxide nanoparticles in seawater that is diluted twice. As is observed, the nanofluid is stable in all of the mentioned concentrations after 12 h, and no precipitations are observed.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Stability of synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticle in twice diluted seawater (a) After 12 h, (b) After 24 h.

After 24 h, samples with concentrations of 1000 and 2000 ppm exhibit partial precipitation due to the increasing particle-particle interactions over time. Consequently, van der Waals forces play a more prominent role in this setting. As particles draw closer to each other over time, these attractive forces can overpower the weakened electrostatic repulsion, resulting in a net attraction that boosts aggregation.

Figure 13b, c show a quantitative examination of the stability of zinc oxide nanoparticles at different concentrations in twice diluted seawater and seawater. In the UV-Vis spectrophotometer, UV light passes through the nanofluid dispersion, and the light intensity decreases exponentially as the nanofluid concentration increases. In better words, as the concentration of nanoparticles decreases, the nanofluid becomes more transparent, leading to an increase in light transmission intensity and a corresponding decrease in absorption.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Quantitatively examine the stability of synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticle in, (a) water, (b) twice diluted seawater, (c) seawater.

Interfacial tension test

One of the most crucial and influential parameters in the enhanced oil recovery process is the value of the interfacial tension between the injected fluid and the reservoir oil. The interfacial tension between the oil and the zinc oxide nanoparticle was measured at 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppm concentrations. As discussed earlier, the utilized base fluids were distilled water, seawater, and twice diluted seawater. Table 3 demonstrates the exact values of various fluids with oil in different concentrations of biological zinc oxide. The values in the table demonstrate that the biological nanoparticle causes a reduction of IFT. The main contributing factor to this is the higher surface charge leading to a higher surface activity which enables the formation of more bonds in the surface of water and oil. Consequently, when the biological nanoparticle is located in the oil-water interface, the contact surface is reduced considerably, leading to the reduction of the IFT.

Table 3 Interfacial tension test results.

The solubility of organic materials, such as asphaltene and resin are considerably higher In solutions with low salinity in comparison with solutions with high salinity. Consequently, in low salinity solutions, organic components with pseudo-surfactant attributes, actually act as a surfactant between the surfaces of water and the oil. As such they act accordingly and lower the interfacial tension more efficiently compared to high-salinity water dubbed as the salting in phenomenon. As the salinity and ion count increases in the water, the mobility of the salt ions towards the water phase increases. Consequently, the salt-water bonds will break on the surface. The presence of more ions in the water will eventually prevent asphaltene and resin from moving toward the water phase, leading to the surface concentrations of asphaltene and resin reaching negative values. Consequently, the interfacial tensions increase with salinity, dubbed the salting out phenomenon. Also, in isothermal conditions, the molecular movement in high-salinity water, is significantly lower compared to low-salinity water. Consequently, the oil-water interface has a thicker film, which within itself increases the interfacial tension.

Wettability alteration test

Wettability alterations (from oil-wet to water-wet) in reservoirs are one of the most important mechanisms for EOR. The surface of carbonate rock has a positive charge. However, when in contact with oil, heavy acidic components of the oil such as carboxylic acids with a negative charge are adsorbed on the surface of the carbonate rock with a positive charge, resulting in the surface becoming oil-wet. As various fluids such as seawater come into contact with carbonate rock, they change the wettability of the carbonate rocks to water-wet due to the presence of potential determining ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42−). In other words, when such fluids come into contact with the carbonate rock surface, the SO42− ion with a negative charge is adsorbed onto the carbonate rock surface (with a positive charge), weakening or eliminating the electric field of the carbonate rock surface, which in turn weakens the holding force of heavy polar compounds of oil on the rock surface (carboxylic acids with a negative charge). Similarly, cations such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ cause the separation of negatively charged carboxylic acid groups of crude oil from the rock surface by forming bonds with them when they come into contact with the reservoir rock. To conduct wettability tests, thin sections of carbonate rock were prepared and made oil-wet. Before the wettability test, the θi factor was measured and found to be 28º for the carbonate rock. After the test, the θo factor was measured and found to be 155º. In the next step, the thin sections were placed in nanofluids containing 500 and 1000 ppm of zinc oxide nanoparticles for a duration of three days. Finally, the θf factor was measured for each separate state, and the results are presented in Table 4. The contact angle of the oil droplet on the surface of distilled water was 140º, while on the surface of the twice-diluted seawater, it was 114º, and on the surface of seawater, it was 125º. The greater reduction in the twice-diluted seawater can be attributed to the presence of effective ions at their optimal surface concentration.

Table 4 Contact angles of biological zinc oxide nanofluids on thin sections of carbonate rock (error bars were not added as they are small in size).

In the presence of nanoparticles, the hydrogen bond between water and the surface of the zinc oxide nanoparticle increases the surface energy, resulting in an increased surface tension between the liquid and solid, a decreased contact angle, and a more hydrophilic surface. Furthermore, an increase in the concentration of the nanoparticle fluid leads to an increase in the number of hydrogen bonds, creating more opportunities for adsorption onto the surface, and further decreasing the contact angle. Figure 14 shows the wettability index for nanoparticle-containing nanofluids and commercial zinc oxide at different concentrations and base fluids. Figure 15 shows the contact angle in carbonate rock in different states.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Wettability index of the biological zinc oxide nanofluids on thin sections of carbonate rock.

Fig. 15
figure 15

The results of wetting the thin sections in (a) oil, (b) Sea water, (c) Twice diluted seawater, (d) Deionized water & ZnO (500 ppm), (e) Sea water & ZnO (1000 ppm), (d) Twice diluted seawater & ZnO (1000 ppm).

Investigating the injection of fluids that contain biological ZnO nanoparticles into the micromodel

Deionized water as a base fluid

Initially, deionized water was injected into the micromodel to investigate its effect on enhancing oil recovery. As shown in Fig. 16a, the mobility ratio of injected fluid is unfavorable, and for this reason, due to the fingering phenomenon, water tends to pass through the most permeable and shortest possible path and reach the outlet of the micromodel. The low recovery of oil from water injection is a result of this phenomenon. The amount of oil recovered in this case is 20%. It is important to note that to ensure the reliability of the results, all the tests were repeated twice, and according to the small size of the error bar, the results of all the micromodel flooding tests have been reported as their mean. Figure 16b illustrates the injection of deionized water fluid that contains zinc oxide biological nanoparticles with a concentration of 500 ppm. According to the figure, the amount of oil recovered in this case is 36%, 16% higher compared to the injection of deionized water without bio-nanoparticles. This increase is due to the effect of the nanoparticles and the reduction of interfacial tension between water and oil, as well as the lower mobility ratio of the injected fluid. Next, in order to investigate the effect of nanoparticle concentration on increasing oil recovery, a base fluid containing nanoparticles with a concentration of 1000 ppm was injected into the micromodel that was saturated with oil. The recovery rate for oil in this case has increased, as demonstrated in Fig. 16c, compared to the previous two injections. This case has a 43% recovery rate for oil. By injecting Nanofluid at a concentration of 1000 ppm, the efficiency of the porous bed sweeper is increased and the injected fluid is in contact with a larger volume of oil. This increase in the oil recovery rate is reasonable when considering the interfacial tension and wettability index in this and previous states.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Oil displacement during deionized water injection with biological zinc oxide NPs, (a) 0 ppm, (b) 500 ppm, (c) 1000 ppm.

Sea water as a base fluid

One of the parameters affecting the performance of biological nanoparticles is the type of base fluid. The presence of different ions in the fluid can result in different performances in oil recovery from reservoirs. Due to the presence of effective ions in seawater injection, it has a higher oil recovery rate compared to deionized water injection and establishes the electrostatic bond between ions and fatty acids with a negative charge in the oil. Figure 17a shows that the recovery rate of oil in this case is 26%, which has increased by 6% compared to deionized water. Figure 17b, c respectively show the injection of fluid containing biological nanoparticles with concentrations of 500 and 1000 ppm along with seawater base fluid, the oil recovery rate is 41% and 49%, respectively. The interfacial tension between the injection fluid and oil is reduced by the presence of biological nanoparticles. Furthermore, the 8% increase in the recovery is attributed to the higher wettability index at 1000 ppm compared to 500 ppm. Figure 17c indicates that the injection fluid front has moved completely uniformly and the fingering phenomenon has been greatly reduced compared to all the mentioned cases.

Fig. 17
figure 17

Oil displacement during seawater injection with biological zinc oxide NPs, (a) 0 ppm, (b) 500, (c) 1000 ppm.

Diluted seawater as a base fluid

The performance of the diluted seawater fluid in enhanced oil recovery is shown in Fig. 18a. As illustrated in the figure, it outperforms the deionized water and the seawater as a base fluid. The oil recovery rate is 30%, and this increase of 10% and 4% is caused by the presence of positively charged ions such as calcium and magnesium at their optimum level. Also, the positive charge and the high ionic activity can lead to ions entering the stern layer and by forming a complex with negatively charged oil acid groups, which then causes these groups to accumulate on the contact surface, reducing the interfacial tension and improving oil recovery.

Fig. 18
figure 18

Oil displacement during diluted seawater injection with biological zinc oxide NPs, (a) 0 ppm, (b) 500 ppm, (c) 1000 ppm.

Figure 18b, c show the injection of bio-nanoparticles with concentrations of 500 and 1000 ppm along with the diluted seawater base fluid. The percentage of oil recovery in these cases is 50 and 56, respectively. The injection fluid front has moved uniformly, as demonstrated in Fig. 18c, and the efficiency of the porous bed sweep has greatly improved compared to injection in all the cases mentioned. Moreover, the effect of the change in wettability is one of the influential factors in this case, which has the highest wettability index relative to all cases. As such, it can separate the remaining oil from the porous bed wall and increase oil recovery by changing wettability to water-wet. Also, in fluids with low salinity, lowering the concentration of inactive salt, NaCl, has a positive effect on Enhanced oil recovery.

Conclusion

In this study, Enterobacter cloacae (PTCC: 1798) has been utilized in the biological synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Furthermore, the performance of the synthesized nanoparticle in enhanced oil recovery has been investigated. Several analytical methods FTIR, FSEM, XRD, DLS, and EDS, were used to analyze the produced ZnO NPs. According to the FTIR test, the 953 peak corresponds to the Zn–OH bond, and the main peak in the results at 463, corresponds to the Zn–O bond. The FESEM analysis confirmed the amorphous form and estimated NPs size in the range of 32 to 58 nm. In investigating the effect of synthesized nanoparticles in interfacial tension and stability tests, three base fluids (distilled water, seawater, and diluted seawater) and 5 levels of nanoparticle concentration (0, 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 ppm) were considered. The Full assessment of the IFT results concludes that with the increase of nanoparticle concentration up to 2000 ppm, the interfacial tension between oil and nanofluid decreases due to the placement of nanoparticles in the interface between the two fluids. Furthermore, the stability test results point out the fact that the concentrations of 500 and 1000 ppm of the produced biological nanoparticles are the most suitable options to investigate the wettability alteration and injection in the porous medium. According to the wettability test, zinc oxide biological nanoparticles can reduce the contact angle between oil and the porous medium from 155 degrees to 45 degrees, indicating the change of wettability of the porous medium from oil-wet to water-wet. The largest contact angle reduction is caused by the nanofluid with a concentration of 1000 ppm with the diluted seawater as base fluid, reducing the angle between the oil droplet and the porous medium by 116 degrees (down to 39 degrees). In this case, the wettability index is 0.91. In the investigation of the synthesized biological nanoparticles’ effect on EOR, nanofluids with different base fluids (water, seawater, diluted seawater) were injected into the porous medium saturated with oil, in which the nanofluids with a concentration of 1000 ppm yielded the best results in terms of enhanced recovery. The highest oil recovery coefficient was 56% for the injection of nanofluid with a concentration of 1000ppm with the diluted seawater base fluid. In the injection of nanofluids with the base fluid of water and seawater with the same concentration of zinc oxide biological nanoparticles, the oil recovery rate was 43% and 49%, respectively. The main mechanism of increasing oil recovery was reducing the interfacial tension between oil and injected nanofluid, as well as changing the wettability of the porous medium from oil-wet to water-wet.