Table 4 Distribution cost comparison.
From: Electric vehicle path optimization research based on charging and switching methods under V2G
COST | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Scenario 4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R-2–30 | R-2–60 | R-2–30 | R-2–60 | R-2–30 | R-2–60 | R-2–30 | R-2–60 | |
GC | 400 | 800 | 400 | 800 | 400 | 800 | 400 | 800 |
YC | 689.82 | 1322.14 | 817.80 | 1805.61 | 682.08 | 1255.63 | 792.91 | 1756.3 |
NC | 86.53 | 210.54 | 122.31 | 355.02 | 85.57 | 196.07 | 129.17 | 327.22 |
CC | 0 | 0 | 212.94 | 604.33 | 0 | 0 | 192.34 | 575.74 |
HC | 200 | 500 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 500 | 0 | 0 |
VC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − 61.2 | − 130.35 | − 18 | − 46 |
DC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.05 | 33.11 |
TC | 1376.35 | 2832.68 | 1553.05 | 3564.85 | 1306.46 | 2621.35 | 1508.47 | 3446.37 |
