Table 1 Indicator selection and description.

From: Follow-up supportive policies and risk perception influence livelihood adaptation of anti-poverty relocated households in ethnic mountains of southwest China

Latent variable

Measurement indicator

Definition and description

Mean

Standard deviation

Follow-up supportive policy (FP)

Employment opportunities

Accessibility to employment opportunities in surrounding areas: 1 = none, 2 = seldom, 3 = less, 4 = some, 5 = a lot (FP1)

2.376

1.140

Training programs

Frequency of training: 1 = 0 times, 2 = 1 time, 3 = 2 times, 4 = 3 times, 5 = more than 3 times (FP2)

2.262

1.150

Public services

Percentage of satisfied infrastructure and public services (FP3)

0.897

0.096

Entitlements protection

The assistance provided by the relocated cadres to the families: 1 = none, 2 = seldom, 3 = less, 4 = some, 5 = a lot (FP4)

4.049

1.078

Comprehensive governance

Satisfaction with the relocation policy: 1 = extremely dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = normal, 4 = satisfied, 5 = completely satisfied (FP5)

4.667

0.566

Risk perception (RP)

Policy risk

A decrease in governmental subsidies after the transition period: 1 = none, 2 = seldom, 3 = general, 4 = large, 5 = severe (RP1)

1.397

0.982

Natural risk

Landlessness after relocation: 1 = none, 2 = seldom, 3 = general, 4 = large, 5 = severe (RP2)

2.408

1.638

Social risk

Inability to enjoy equivalent benefits as local residents: 1 = none, 2 = seldom, 3 = general, 4 = large, 5 = severe (RP3)

1.103

0.538

Living risk

Sharp increase in the cost of living: 1 = none, 2 = seldom, 3 = general, 4 = large, 5 = severe (RP4)

2.841

1.513

Production risk

The absence of reliable sources of revenue: 1 = none, 2 = seldom, 3 = general, 4 = large, 5 = severe (RP5)

2.298

1.543

Cultural risk

Traditional national culture under attack: 1 = none, 2 = seldom, 3 = general, 4 = large, 5 = severe (RP6)

1.597

0.803

Learning capacity (LC)

Education level

Average years of education for family members (LC1)

4.374

2.397

Information channel

Channels for accessing information (LC2)

1.616

0.894

Policy awareness

Understanding of relocation policy: 1 = not clear, 2 = not familiar, 3 = general, 4 = familiar, 5 = know well (LC3)

3.197

1.325

Vocational skill

Whether there is a skilled workforce: 0 = no, 1 = yes (LC4)

0.099

0.298

Buffering capacity (BC)

Cultivated land

Actual cultivated land per capita (BC1)

1.038

2.144

Forest land

Forest land per capita (BC2)

1.116

2.359

Livestock numbers

Livestock numbers = Cattle*1 + Horses*0.8 + Sheep*0.6 + Pigs*0.4 + Chickens*0.2 (BC3)

1.855

6.443

Consumer durables

Percentage of consumer durables (BC4)

0.546

0.161

Family deposit

Current savings of the family to living needs: 1 = unable to meet demand, 2 = basically meet demand, 3 = demand satisfied and partially remaining (BC5)

1.854

0.524

Labor force

Labor force ratio:1 = Less than 0.25, 2 = 0.24–0.35, 3 = 0.35–0.5, 4 = 0.5–0.6, 5 = more than 0.6 (BC6)

2.704

1.359

Self-organization capacity (SC)

Influential Ties

Relatives or friends working as village (township) cadres or civil servants: 0 = No; 1 = Yes (SC1)

0.200

0.200

Group engagement

Participation in group activities: 1 = never, 2 = seldom, 3 = occasionally, 4 = often, 5 = always (SC2)

4.326

1.009

Neighborhood interactions

Frequency of contact with neighbors: 1 = never, 2 = seldom, 3 = occasionally, 4 = often, 5 = always (SC3)

3.824

1.151

Neighborhood trust

Neighborhood relations: 1 = tense, 2 = partial contradictions, 3 = general, 4 = good, 5 = Very well (SC4)

4.824

0.467

Social networks

proportion of communication expenses spent (SC5)

0.125

0.082

Adaptive strategy (AS)

Strategy choice

Strategy choice:1 = assistance, 2 = contraction, 3 = retention,

4 = expansion, 5 = adjustment (AS1)

3.994

1.178

Adaptation outcome (AO)

Livelihood quality (LQ)

Income per capita(Yuan) (LQ1)

8625.750

6942.160

Simpson Livelihood Diversification Index (LQ2)

0.135

0.180

Livelihood Perception (LP)

Adaptive evaluation:1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied (LP1)

4.504

0.594

Future confidence: 1 = worse, 2 = Same, 3 = better (LP2)

2.835

0.583

Identity recognition: 1 = strangers, 2 = not clear, 3 = local (LP3)

2.884

0.444

  1. To eliminate differences in scales among various measurement indicators, this study applies range normalization to the raw data.