Table 4 Subgroup analysis of treatment outcomes based on operator level after propensity score matching.

From: Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors

 

Expert

(n = 154)

 

Trainee

(n = 64)

 

No. of lesions

m-EMR

(n = 76)

ESD

(n = 78)

P value

m-EMR

(n = 33)

ESD

(n = 31)

P value

Treatment outcomes

Procedural time, median (range), min

5.5 (3–17)

22 (7–97)

< 0.001*

6 (2–13)

40 (20–120)

< 0.001*

En bloc resection

76 (100%)

78 (100%)

1.00

33 (100%)

31 (100%)

1.00

Resection margin

Negative

69 (90.8%)

70 (89.7%)

0.684

29 (87.9%)

20 (64.5%)

0.017*

Indeterminate

2 (2.6%)

4 (5.1%)

 

3 (9.1%)

2 (6.5%)

 

Positive

5 (6.6%)

4 (5.1%)

 

1 (3.0%)

9 (29.0%)

 

Adverse events

Postprocedure bleeding

2 (2.6%)

2 (2.6%)

1.00

4 (12.1%)

1 (3.2%)

0.356

Perforation

1 (1.3%)

0 (0%)

0.494

0 (0%)

1 (0%)

0.484

  1. m-EMR, modified endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.
  2. *P < .05.