Table 5 Subgroup analysis of treatment outcomes based on lesion size after propensity score matching.

From: Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and modified endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors

 

Lesion size < 5 mm

(n = 74)

 

Lesion size ≥ 5 mm

(n = 144)

 

No. of lesions

m-EMR

(n = 36)

ESD

(n = 38)

P value

m-EMR

(n = 73)

ESD

(n = 71)

P value

Treatment outcomes

Procedure time, median (range), min

6 (3–14)

21.5 (9–73)

< 0.001*

6 (2–17)

27 (7–120)

< 0.001*

En bloc resection

36 (100%)

38 (100%)

1.00

73 (100%)

71 (100%)

1.00

Resection margin

Negative

35 (97.2%)

33 (86.8%)

0.189

63 (86.3%)

57 (80.3%)

0.529

Indeterminate

1 (2.8%)

2 (5.3%)

 

4 (5.5%)

4 (5.6%)

 

Positive

0 (0%)

3 (7.9%)

 

6 (8.2%)

10 (14.1%)

 

Adverse events

Postprocedure bleeding

3 (8.3%)

3 (7.9%)

1.00

3 (4.1%)

0 (0%)

0.245

Perforation

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1.00

1 (1.4%)

1 (1.4%)

1.00

  1. m-EMR, modified endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.