Table 1 Comparison of different models in the literature with the proposed model.
Ref | Year | Objective | Scheduling method | Stages | Uncertainty | Power management | Priority charging | Performance indices |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | Maximises benefit to prosumers | Stackelberg | Three | × | ✓ | × | SSR SCR NCE | |
2024 | Reduce electricity cost | Chi-square and normal distribution | Single | EV behaviour | ✓ | × | SSR SCR NCE | |
2023 | Minimizing operational cost | MILP | Single | × | × | ✓ | Fairness | |
2021 | Maximizing profit | PSO | Single | EV behaviour | ✓ | ✓ | Fairness | |
2022 | Minimizing operational costs | MILP | Single | PV, wind | ✓ | × | – | |
2022 | Maximizing profit | GA | Three | EV behaviour | ✓ | × | – | |
2022 | Maximizing profit | MILP | Two | EV behaviour | × | × | – | |
2022 | Minimizing consumption costs and maximizing parking benefits | Kernal smoothing | Three | EV behaviour | × | × | SCR | |
2017 | Minimize the charging cost for the parking lot operator | LP | Single | PV, wind | × | × | SSR | |
2023 | Minimize the electricity cost | Rule-based | Two | PV, wind, loads | ✓ | × | SSR SCR NCE | |
Proposed work | Maximize profit | LP rule-based | Three | PV, wind, loads and EV behaviour | ✓ | ✓ | SSR SCR NCE Fairness |
