Table 4 Diagnostic performance of UDFF and Clinical prediction models.
Diagnostic performance | Steatosis grade | Cutoff | AUROC (95% CI) | Sens (%) | Spec (%) | vs. UDFF P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDFF | ≥ 2 | 20.5 | 0.82(0.72–0.92) | 86 | 68 | - |
≥ 3 | 23.5 | 0.75(0.64–0.86) | 81 | 65 | - | |
FLI | ≥ 2 | 31.9 | 0.67(0.55–0.79) | 65 | 64 | 0.03 |
≥ 3 | 55.6 | 0.61(0.49–0.74) | 45 | 80 | 0.04 | |
HSI | ≥ 2 | 52.2 | 0.72(0.60–0.84) | 75 | 68 | 0.23 |
≥ 3 | 53.9 | 0.62(0.49–0.74) | 65 | 65 | 0.11 | |
ZJU index | ≥ 2 | 49.5 | 0.71(0.58–0.83) | 93 | 46 | 0.16 |
≥ 3 | 50.0 | 0.58(0.46–0.70) | 94 | 32 | 0.03 | |
LAP | ≥ 2 | 84.4 | 0.56(0.42–0.69) | 74 | 46 | < 0.01 |
≥ 3 | 128.8 | 0.55(0.42–0.68) | 42 | 74 | 0.02 |
