Table 4 Effect of index case CAC status on Mtb infection in household contacts.
Mtb infection endpoint | CAC- Exposure | CAC + Exposure | p-value* | OR (95% CI)* | aOR (95% CI)* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Na | (n, %)b | Nc | (n, %)d | ||||
Any ESAT6/CFP10 response | |||||||
QFT-Plus (IFN-γ) | 195 | 107 (54.9%) | 25 | 22 (88.0%) | 0.013 | 11.50 (1.68, 78.7) | 29.35 (1.83, 471.40)† |
IL-2 | 184 | 99 (53.8%) | 26 | 22 (84.6%) | 0.022 | 6.98 (1.33, 36.75) | 12.64 (1.87, 85.40)†† |
TNF | 134 | 49 (36.6%) | 17 | 6 (35.3%) | 0.944 | 0.96 (0.30, 3.09) | – |
Composite measure** | 201 | 133 (66.2%) | 26 | 23 (88.5%) | 0.041 | 5.37 (1.07, 27.0) | 11.2 (1.55, 80.21)†††† |
Any 2 ESAT6/CFP10 response including QFT-Plus (IFN-γ) | |||||||
QFT-Plus (IFN-γ) or IL-2 | 201 | 116 (57.7%) | 26 | 22 (84.6%) | 0.038 | 5.70 (1.10, 29.56) | 14.91 (1.63, 136.28)††† |
QFT-Plus (IFN-γ) or TNF | 200 | 126 (63.0%) | 26 | 23 (88.5%) | 0.025 | 6.48 (1.27, 33.11) | 13.6 (1.89, 98.63)†††† |