Table 12 Comparison ranking with existing method.
From: Development of a triangular Fermatean fuzzy EDAS model for remote patient monitoring applications
Proposed method | Ranking |
|---|---|
EDAS method | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5}\) |
TFFSWWA operator | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5}\) |
Other method | |
TOPSIS method10 | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5}\) |
GRA method79 | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5}\) |
CoCoSo method80 | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5}\) |
ELECTRE method81 | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3}\) |
WASPAS method82 | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3}\) |
Other operator | |
FFDWA operator30 | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5}\) |
FFYWA operator63 | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5}\) |
FFAAWA operator67 | \({\tilde{\chi }}_{4} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{2} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{3} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{1} > {\tilde{\chi }}_{5}\) |
