Table 4 Baseline regression results.

From: The impact of digital education on household allocation of risky financial assets in China

 

Ownership of risky financial assets

Types of risky financial assets

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Digital education (principal component analysis)

0.417***

 

0.256***

 

(29.98)

 

(34.80)

 

Digital education (summed)

 

0.445***

 

0.274***

 

(32.17)

 

(36.66)

Gender

− 0.066***

− 0.064***

− 0.044***

− 0.043***

(− 3.13)

(− 3.01)

(− 3.78)

(− 3.68)

Age

− 0.041***

− 0.040***

− 0.019***

− 0.019***

(− 50.26)

(− 49.94)

(− 43.81)

(− 43.33)

Marital status

− 0.155***

− 0.154***

− 0.052***

− 0.052***

(− 5.75)

(− 5.73)

(− 3.13)

(− 3.09)

Health condition

0.074***

0.073***

0.036***

0.035***

(8.12)

(7.98)

(6.37)

(6.25)

Years of education

0.034***

0.033***

0.016***

0.016***

(14.70)

(14.36)

(14.37)

(14.17)

Family size

− 0.004

− 0.004

0.005

0.006

(− 0.66)

(− 0.61)

(1.33)

(1.56)

Total family income

0.129***

0.126***

0.086***

0.083***

(17.90)

(17.58)

(17.25)

(16.93)

Total family assets

0.277***

0.269***

0.233***

0.228***

(34.16)

(33.23)

(43.75)

(42.96)

Total family debt

0.016***

0.016***

0.001

0.001

(8.43)

(8.47)

(0.93)

(0.98)

Engagement in business

− 0.656***

− 0.645***

− 0.429***

− 0.422***

(− 18.42)

(− 18.12)

(− 22.38)

(− 22.07)

Ownership of housing

0.620***

0.617***

0.057***

0.055***

(18.01)

(17.86)

(4.75)

(4.63)

Proportion of education expenditure in public finance

3.854***

4.028***

1.466*

1.543*

(3.00)

(3.12)

(1.80)

(1.90)

Proportion of science and technology expenditure in public finance

5.245**

5.508**

3.117**

3.260**

(2.43)

(2.55)

(2.43)

(2.55)

Regional GDP

− 0.146***

− 0.154***

− 0.061**

− 0.064***

(− 3.30)

(− 3.48)

(− 2.57)

(− 2.70)

Province fixed effects

Y

Y

Y

Y

Cons

− 1.518***

− 2.509***

− 2.948***

− 3.579***

(− 4.29)

(− 7.07)

(− 15.72)

(− 19.10)

N

33,436

33,436

33,436

33,436

R2

0.3741

0.3771

0.1446

0.1457

  1. *, **, *** represent significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.