Fig. 4

(a) Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test results for the uniformity of mass. ns (p > 0.05), ns—not significant, * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001). (b) Dunn’s multiple comparisons test results for the thickness measurement. ns (p > 0.05), ns—not significant, * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001). (c) Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test results for the folding endurance. ns (p > 0.05), ns—not significant, * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001). (d) Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test results for thickness-normalized tensile strength. ns (p > 0.05), ns—not significant, * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001). (e) Dunn’s multiple comparisons test results for adhesivity. ns (p > 0.05), ns—not significant, * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001). (f) Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test results for pH. ns (p > 0.05), ns—not significant, * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001). (g) Dunn’s multiple comparisons test results for the disintegration time through the pharmacopeial method. ns (p > 0.05), ns—not significant, * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001). (h) Dunn’s multiple comparisons test results for the disintegration time through the slide frame method. ns (p > 0.05), ns—not significant, * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001). (i) UV‒Vis spectrophotometry method linearity (1) and the statistical evaluation between the two CBD-ODFs via the t-test with Welch’s correction (2). ns (p > 0.05), ns—not significant, * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01); *** (p < 0.001); **** (p < 0.0001).