Table 3 Classification analysis of the SOADL-MCAIC model with 30% of TSPH.
Class labels | \({\varvec{Accu}}_{{\varvec{y}}}\) | \({\varvec{Prec}}_{{\varvec{n}}}\) | \({\varvec{Reca}}_{{\varvec{l}}}\) | \({\varvec{F}}_{{{\varvec{score}}}}\) | \({\varvec{G}}_{{{\varvec{mean}}}}\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSPH (30%) | |||||
0 | 99.68 | 94.29 | 100.00 | 97.06 | 99.83 |
1 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
2 | 99.52 | 96.15 | 92.59 | 94.34 | 96.15 |
3 | 99.37 | 93.33 | 93.33 | 93.33 | 96.45 |
4 | 99.52 | 100.00 | 93.02 | 96.39 | 96.45 |
5 | 99.05 | 94.74 | 78.26 | 85.71 | 88.39 |
6 | 99.84 | 95.24 | 100.00 | 97.56 | 99.92 |
7 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
8 | 99.84 | 100.00 | 96.97 | 98.46 | 98.47 |
9 | 99.68 | 96.55 | 96.55 | 96.55 | 98.18 |
10 | 99.84 | 100.00 | 96.55 | 98.25 | 98.26 |
11 | 99.52 | 88.00 | 100.00 | 93.62 | 99.75 |
12 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
13 | 99.84 | 96.97 | 100.00 | 98.46 | 99.92 |
14 | 99.68 | 94.87 | 100.00 | 97.37 | 99.83 |
15 | 99.84 | 97.14 | 100.00 | 98.55 | 99.92 |
16 | 99.52 | 93.33 | 96.55 | 94.92 | 98.10 |
17 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
18 | 99.37 | 97.06 | 91.67 | 94.29 | 95.66 |
19 | 99.37 | 93.10 | 93.10 | 93.10 | 96.33 |
20 | 99.52 | 92.86 | 96.30 | 94.55 | 97.97 |
Average | 99.67 | 96.36 | 96.42 | 96.31 | 98.07 |
