Table 1 Summary of the literature review.

From: Reliability assessment of friction stir welds in AA100 aluminium alloy using ANN and ANFIS predictive models

Theme

References

Relevance of research questions

Contributions/insights

Identified gaps

FSW process

Singh et al.1; Gebreamlak et al.2; Kaygusuz et al.3; Mishra and Ma5; Khalafe et al.13; Sezhian et al.6; Kwon et al.8

Provides a fundamental understanding of FSW required for RQ1 and RQ3

FSW is a solid-state joining process that has several advantages, including high bond strength and minimal defects

Improves mechanical properties in alloys such as AA 1100

A lack of real-time models for industrial applications

There is little data on long-term reliability and challenges in welding dissimilar materials

Parametric study in FSW

Gite et al.7; Kwon et al.8; Chauhan and Kumar9; Prakash et al.10; Albunduqee and Al-Bugharbee11; Rani et al.12; Hasnol14; Khalafe et al.13,

Directly related to RQ1 by optimising FSW parameters for reliability in AA 1100 alloy plates

Identifying key parameters (rotational speed, welding speed, tool geometry)

Optimising parameters produces high-quality, defect-free joints

Few studies on dissimilar materials and parameter interactions to reduce defects

There is a need for refined tool designs and advanced optimisation

Parametric optimisation techniques

Osarumwense and Rose15; Ghetiya et al.16; He et al.17 Azadegan et al.18; Chi and Hsu19; Prabhakar et al.20; Isa et al.21; Alok et al.23; Toorajipour et al.25

Relevant to RQs 1 and 3 for determining optimal welding parameters and evaluating reliability using methods such as Weibull analysis

Optimisation techniques such as Taguchi, RSM, and bio-inspired algorithms improve FSW results

Soft computing techniques improve decision-making

Optimisation for materials with different properties is still in its early stages

Advanced bio-inspired algorithms are required for dynamic control, as is integration with AI

Soft computing and AI in FSW

Okuyucu and Arcaklioglu27; Boulahem et al.28; Lomolino et al.33; Elanchezhian et al.34; Gokulachandran and Mohandas36; Rizvi et al.37; Pitchipoo et al.38; Ilangovan et al.35; Cederqvist and Öberg39

Addresses RQ2 by comparing ANN to other AI models and RQ3 through AI-based reliability evaluations

AI models such as ANN predict weld quality and optimise parameters

Soft computing methods outperform traditional models for predicting weld results

The AI models for real-time control have not been fully implemented

More research is needed into AI-based long-term reliability and integration with real-time feedback systems