Table 6 Cybersecurity detection of EIDCDR-XAIADL method under the CICIDS 2017 dataset.
Class Labels | \(\:\varvec{A}\varvec{c}\varvec{c}{\varvec{u}}_{\varvec{y}}\) | \(\:\varvec{P}\varvec{r}\varvec{e}{\varvec{c}}_{\varvec{n}}\) | \(\:\varvec{R}\varvec{e}\varvec{c}{\varvec{a}}_{\varvec{l}}\) | \(\:{\varvec{F}}_{\varvec{s}\varvec{c}\varvec{o}\varvec{r}\varvec{e}}\) | \(\:\varvec{M}\varvec{C}\varvec{C}\) | Kappa Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Epoch − 500 | ||||||
 Normal | 98.84 | 98.83 | 98.84 | 98.83 | 97.67 | 97.88 |
 Anomaly | 98.83 | 98.84 | 98.83 | 98.83 | 97.67 | 97.54 |
 Average | 98.83 | 98.83 | 98.83 | 98.83 | 97.67 | 97.71 |
Epoch − 1000 | ||||||
 Normal | 98.70 | 99.05 | 98.70 | 98.88 | 97.76 | 97.90 |
 Anomaly | 99.06 | 98.71 | 99.06 | 98.88 | 97.76 | 97.67 |
 Average | 98.88 | 98.88 | 98.88 | 98.88 | 97.76 | 97.79 |
Epoch − 1500 | ||||||
 Normal | 99.00 | 98.94 | 99.00 | 98.97 | 97.94 | 97.95 |
 Anomaly | 98.94 | 99.00 | 98.94 | 98.97 | 97.94 | 97.99 |
 Average | 98.97 | 98.97 | 98.97 | 98.97 | 97.94 | 97.97 |
Epoch − 2000 | ||||||
 Normal | 99.21 | 98.80 | 99.21 | 99.01 | 98.01 | 98.18 |
 Anomaly | 98.80 | 99.21 | 98.80 | 99.00 | 98.01 | 97.97 |
 Average | 99.00 | 99.00 | 99.00 | 99.00 | 98.01 | 98.08 |
Epoch − 2500 | ||||||
 Normal | 99.17 | 98.97 | 99.17 | 99.07 | 98.13 | 98.34 |
 Anomaly | 98.96 | 99.17 | 98.96 | 99.07 | 98.13 | 98.00 |
 Average | 99.07 | 99.07 | 99.07 | 99.07 | 98.13 | 98.17 |
Epoch − 3000 | ||||||
 Normal | 99.14 | 99.11 | 99.14 | 99.12 | 98.25 | 98.20 |
 Anomaly | 99.11 | 99.14 | 99.11 | 99.12 | 98.25 | 98.42 |
 Average | 99.12 | 99.12 | 99.12 | 99.12 | 98.25 | 98.31 |
