Table 7 The comparison results for swarm evolution algorithm, R-tabu, SG-tabu, ILP, SA, RRHC, and GRASP.
Instance | b | Swarm-E-1 | Swarm-E-2 | R-tabu | SG-tabu | ILP | SA | RRHC | GRASP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 20 | 123 | 123 | 123 | 123 | 123 | 109 | 121 | 123 |
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 21 | 121 | 120 | 121 | 120 | 120 | 121 | 115 | 120 |
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 25 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 113 | 116 |
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 28 | 113 | 111 | 113 | 113 | 111 | 111 | 108 | 111 |
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 70 | 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 | 63 | 70 | 71 | 71 |
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 99 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 36 | 9 | 32 | 44 |
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 100 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 35 | 10 | 29 | 41 |
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 120 | 21 | 22 | 21 | 22 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 22 |
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 125 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 16 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 16 |
C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11 | 141 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
C21 \({ \boxtimes }\) C20 | 80 | 300 | 298 | 300 | 300 | 296 | 272 | 275 | 300 |
C21 \({ \boxtimes }\) C20 | 100 | 280 | 274 | 276 | 276 | 276 | 240 | 266 | 276 |
K9ā”K6 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
K15ā”K10 | 10 | 80 | 77 | 80 | 80 | 79 | 80 | 79 | 80 |
K15ā”K10 | 40 | 32 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 32 | 8 | 30 |
K15ā”K10 | 70 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 12 | 15 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
G200,0.1 | 10 | 115 | 111 | 121 | 121 | 115 | 81 | 121 | 121 |
G200,0.1 | 40 | 38 | 21 | 39 | 40 | 29 | 32 | 37 | 37 |
G500,0.1 | 20 | 157 | 116 | 150 | 151 | 110 | 146 | 147 | 149 |
G500,0.1 | 40 | 77 | 33 | 71 | 72 | 44 | 56 | 62 | 68 |
SR150,50,60 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 5 | 1 | 60 |
SR150,60,50 | 60 | 1 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
SR150,40,40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 40 |
SR200,30,60 | 30 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 2 | 0 | 60 |
SR230,15,200 | 15 | 28 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 27 | 31 | 199 | 200 |
SR450,50,200 | 50 | 50 | 200 | 52 | 200 | 52 | 51 | 0 | 200 |