Table 7 The comparison results for swarm evolution algorithm, R-tabu, SG-tabu, ILP, SA, RRHC, and GRASP.

From: An efficient swarm evolution algorithm with probability learning for the black and white coloring problem

Instance

b

Swarm-E-1

Swarm-E-2

R-tabu

SG-tabu

ILP

SA

RRHC

GRASP

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

20

123

123

123

123

123

109

121

123

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

21

121

120

121

120

120

121

115

120

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

25

116

116

116

116

116

116

113

116

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

28

113

111

113

113

111

111

108

111

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

70

71

71

71

71

63

70

71

71

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

99

44

44

44

44

36

9

32

44

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

100

41

41

41

41

35

10

29

41

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

120

21

22

21

22

21

2

2

22

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

125

18

18

18

16

18

1

0

16

C15 \({ \boxtimes }\) C11

141

8

8

8

6

8

1

0

6

C21 \({ \boxtimes }\) C20

80

300

298

300

300

296

272

275

300

C21 \({ \boxtimes }\) C20

100

280

274

276

276

276

240

266

276

K9ā–”K6

10

16

16

16

16

16

16

16

16

K15ā–”K10

10

80

77

80

80

79

80

79

80

K15ā–”K10

40

32

35

35

35

35

32

8

30

K15ā–”K10

70

10

15

15

12

15

12

0

12

G200,0.1

10

115

111

121

121

115

81

121

121

G200,0.1

40

38

21

39

40

29

32

37

37

G500,0.1

20

157

116

150

151

110

146

147

149

G500,0.1

40

77

33

71

72

44

56

62

68

SR150,50,60

50

60

60

60

60

60

5

1

60

SR150,60,50

60

1

50

50

50

8

0

0

50

SR150,40,40

40

40

40

40

40

10

3

0

40

SR200,30,60

30

60

60

60

60

60

2

0

60

SR230,15,200

15

28

200

200

200

27

31

199

200

SR450,50,200

50

50

200

52

200

52

51

0

200