Table 3 Primary outcome with different models for two parts.

From: Prognostic value of dynamic KDIGO staging in acute kidney injury after acute heart failure: a doubly robust analysis

 

Non-AKI V.S

Mild-AKI

Normal-or-mild-AKI V.S.

Moderate-to-severe-AKI

Result

P-value

Result

P-value

28-day mortality

 Log-rank test [HR (95% CI)]

1.21 (0.91, 1.63)

0.20

2.17 (1.87, 2.52)

 < 0.001

 Multivariate Logistic model adjusted with Boruta selected covariates [OR (95% CI)]

0.97 (0.69, 1.38)

0.87

2.02 (1.64, 2.49)

 < 0.001

 Multivariate Logistic model adjusted with unbalanced covariates [OR (95% CI)]

1.01 (0.79, 1.29)

0.95

2.00 (1.74, 2.30)

 < 0.001

 Survey-weighted GLM model adjusted with Boruta selected covariates using IPTW [OR (95% CI)]

1.01 (0.71, 1.44)

0.96

2.00 (1.62, 2.47)

 < 0.001

 Survey-weighted GLM model adjusted with unbalanced covariates using IPTW [OR (95% CI)]

1.04 (0.74, 1.47)

0.81

1.83 (1.50, 2.23)

 < 0.001

180-day mortality

 Log-rank test [HR (95% CI)]

1.15 (0.95, 1.38)

0.15

1.56 (1.40, 1.73)

 < 0.001

 Multivariate Cox model adjusted with Boruta selected covariates [HR (95% CI)]

1.01 (0.83, 1.22)

0.95

1.08 (1.05, 1.11)

 < 0.001

 Multivariate Cox model adjusted with unbalanced covariates [HR (95% CI)]

1.05 (0.86, 1.27)

0.64

1.08 (1.05, 1.11)

 < 0.001

 Survey-weighted Cox model adjusted with Boruta selected covariates using IPTW [HR (95% CI)]

1.03 (0.84, 1.26)

0.79

1.08 (1.04, 1.11)

 < 0.001

 Survey-weighted Cox model adjusted with unbalanced covariates using IPTW [HR (95% CI)]

1.04 (0.85, 1.28)

0.68

1.07 (1.04, 1.11)

 < 0.001

1-Year mortality

 Log-rank test [HR (95% CI)]

1.07 (0.91, 1.26)

0.39

1.37 (1.24, 1.51)

 < 0.001

 Multivariate Cox model adjusted with Boruta selected covariates [HR (95% CI)]

0.97 (0.82, 1.15)

0.73

1.05 (1.02, 1.07)

 < 0.001

 Multivariate Cox model adjusted with unbalanced covariates [HR (95% CI)]

1.01 (0.86, 1.20)

0.86

1.04 (1.02, 1.07)

 < 0.001

 Survey-weighted Cox model adjusted with Boruta selected covariates using IPTW [HR (95% CI)]

1.00 (0.84, 1.18)

0.96

1.04 (1.02, 1.07)

 < 0.01

 Survey-weighted Cox model adjusted with unbalanced covariates using IPTW [HR (95% CI)]

1.01 (0.85, 1.20)

0.88

1.04 (1.01, 1.06)

 < 0.01

  1. Statistical analyses of different models with p-value < 0.05 were displayed in bold.
  2. OR, Odds Ratio; HR, Hazard Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; IPTW, Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
Back to article page