Table 1 Comparison of basic characteristics between study group and control group 1 patients.

From: Retrospective comparative study on efficacy and safety of different surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse

Group

POP-Q staging

Study group (n = 33)

Control group 1 (n = 49)

t/U

P

Age

67.52 ± 5.97

66.20 ± 6.09

0.96

0.34

Metroptosis 1 degree

0 (0.00%)

6 (12.24%)

1449.0

0.00

Metroptosis 2 degree

0 (0.00%)

27 (55.10%)

Metroptosis 3 degree

21 (63.64%)

16 (32.65%)

Metroptosis 4 degree

12 (36.36%)

0 (0.00%)

Descensus vaginae anterior 1 degree

0 (0.00%)

2 (4.08%)

1267.5

0.00

Descensus vaginae anterior 2 degree

3 (9.09%)

16 (32.65%)

Descensus vaginae anterior 3 degree

15 (45.45%)

31 (63.27%)

Descensus vaginae anterior 4 degree

15 (45.45%)

0 (0.00%)

Descent vaginae posterior 1 degree

3 (9.09%)

20 (40.82%)

1356.0

0.00

Descent vaginae posterior 2 degree

15 (45.45%)

22 (40.90%)

Descent vaginae posterior 3 degree

6 (18.18%)

0 (0.00%)

Descent vaginae posterior 4 degree

9 (27.27%)

0 (0.00%)

SUI

5 (15.15%)

7 (14.29%)

 

0.85