Table 2 Scenario based evaluation of ADDT.
Scenario | Clinical setting | Challenge | Baseline method | (ADDT + ensemble perceptron) | Improvement/observation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1: real-time ICU monitoring | Intensive Care Unit with fluctuating vitals (HR, BP, SpO₂) | Sensor dropout due to noise/interference | Rule-based alerts with threshold-only decision | Identifies substitute clinical data using disparity detection and maintains continuity via perceptron fusion | Reduces false alerts by 35%, improves sequence consistency by ~ 28% |
S2: remote patient monitoring | At-home care for elderly patients with wearable ECG & oxygen sensors | Data gaps due to poor connectivity or motion artifacts | Traditional interpolation or missing-value imputation | Disparity detection flags unreliable data; ensemble adapts using highest-confidence clinical matches | Increases prediction accuracy by ~ 21%, lowers anomaly detection time by ~ 18% |
S3: chronic disease monitoring | Diabetic patient with wearable glucose and pressure sensors + periodic clinical reports | Time-misaligned sensor-clinical inputs | Linear regression or static ML models | Periodic correlation adjusts weights with clinical trends; adaptive precision-based update | Achieves 12–16% better glucose level classification; improved adaptability to patient variation |