Table 1 Comparison of the catalytic reduction of MO, CV and K3[Fe(CN)6] by using Gl-Cs/CuO-NiO hydrogel in the presence of NaBH4 with other reported catalysts.
From: Metal nanocomposite supported on gelatin chitosan hydrogel as a catalyst for the removal of toxins
Pollutant | Catalyst | Time (s) | Rate constant (s−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MO | Gl-Cs/CuO-NiO hydrogel | 180 | 1.16 × 10−2 | This study |
MO | Ni/Cs@CMC/CuO-Co2O3 | 120 | 1.06 × 10−2 | |
MO | Cu/CSA | 600 | 2.7 × 10−2 | |
MO | Ag@rGO | 120 | 1.81 × 10−3 | |
MO | Ag-NiO2@PVA | 1200 | 1.0 × 10−2 | |
CV | Gl-Cs/CuO-NiO hydrogel | 28 | 3.36 × 10−1 | This study |
CV | g-CN decorated with AgNPs | 480 | 9.62 × 10−3 | |
CV | FeNPs | 600 | - | |
K3[Fe(CN)6] | Gl-Cs/CuO-NiO hydrogel | 30 | 3.4 × 10−2 | This study |
K3[Fe(CN)6] | SA/Na-CMC/GA | 40 | 3.8 × 10−2 | |
K3[Fe(CN)6] | SnLa2O5/CMC-Alg | 240 | 1.24 × 10−2 | |
K3[Fe(CN)6] | CA-CMC/Fe2O3-NiO | 30 | 4.82 × 10−2 |
